Posted on 10/31/2017 5:00:01 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
It would be laughable if it weren’t so infuriating . . . Every time there is an Islamic terror attack, someone in the liberal media will claim that it is not really Islamic.
And so Chris Matthews’ MSNBC show rolled out Malcolm Nance, it’s “terrorism analyst,” this evening to comment on the murderous attack in NYC today. And sure enough:
“What you’re seeing is not Islam, whatsoever . . . None of that is Islamic. It’s anti-Islamic.”
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblogger.com ...
Clearly a “so called” “Expert”.
He must practice his Arabic with John Brennan.
They’re going to kill us all.
Until we force the government to change their ways, this is our future.
They don’t care what the truth is. The agenda subordinates everything. That’s why colleges ban opposing viewpoints.
This is nothing new. For decades Liberals have claimed that anything that would make Communism look bad is not really Communism. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and many others were not really instituting Communism. Therefore, to Liberals, Communism has never failed and has killed nobody. Now they are they have replaced “Communism” with “Islam”.
The video snapped by an onlooker showed he had a big muzzie beard. And he rented that truck in Jersey City - a hotbed of jihadi activity ignored by our government.
Got “Terrorism Analyst” title from the back of a matchbook
And I guess now we are finding it IS ISLAM? At point did he give up his analytical skills and become a political mouthpiece?
Because they both worship Satan
“He’s so dense, light bends around him.”
MSNBC....getting it wrong at every opportunity
I’m going to agree with him...to a degree.
I think the Dems orchestrated this “lone wolf” attack to avert attention from uranium and Russia.
I suspect there are at least four types of Muslims that invade the West. There are the Jihadist, that want to terrorize the Kafirs and kill them in the name of Islam. There are those that come to the West and want to out-breed the native populations to create Islamic states through numbers in the West. There are those that approve both of the previous tactics as part of an over all strategy, and then there are those who simple want to better themselves and are not particularly interested in, but not adverse to, long-term Islamic goals. I have no idea what percent of the Muslim community is in each group.
Because they want to destroy our great nation in its present form, is the answer. They really do not like the Islamic fundamentalist anymore than we do. However, they are their temporary allies in the destruction of our great Republic.
It is much like WWII. We allied with the evil Soviet Union to destroy another evil which was NAZI Germany.
The real hell of it is, if the Islamists actually win, those liberals will be the first ones shot.
Question?
In a group of 100 potential immigrants 51% believe in Sharia Law. That is actually a real number of those from the Middle East. In some nations it is much higher.
We do not know which ones do believe or do not believe. Should we admit anyone of them if we do not know with certainty those whom are a danger?
ps
I worked in the Middle East for several years. I have worked with damn good people that would be an asset to our great nation. However, if they can not be properly vetted they should not be allowed to immigrate to our nation. Sadly this will deny entrance to some good people. This is because of very bad people that live in those nations that wish us great harm.
The last I heard we did not have terror attacks from the Poles, the Hungarians, the Czechs, not even the Amish, etc.
I was hoping he would be white!
Yes, the gay club shooting in Orlando was a picked target. Any place (or person) that isn’t allowed in a Muslim country will be targeted here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.