Posted on 10/21/2017 8:04:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
President Donald J. Trump announced via Twitter Saturday morning that he will release the long anticipated classified files surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 21, 2017
There are currently more than 3,000 classified documents in the National Archives regarding JFK’s death and the investigation into his killer, Lee Harvey Oswald.
25 years ago, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 which ordered the acting commander-in-chief to release all JFK files by October 26, 2017, barring any threat to national intelligence or security.
Phil Shenon is a Kennedy expert and has written a book on the Warren Commission, the committee tasked with Kennedy’s assassination investigation. Shenon told the Washington Post that “it’s great news that the president is focused on this and that he’s trying to demonstrate transparency. But the question remains whether he will open the library in full — every word in every document, as the law requires.”
Shenon goes on to note that such a move would infuriate “people at the CIA and elsewhere who are determined to keep at least some of the information secret, especially in documents created in the 1990s.”
Reports earlier this week claimed that Roger Stone, long time Trump ally, was lobbying the President to release the documents. Stone, an infowars.com contributor told the publication on Thursday that President Trump was all ears on releasing the highly intriguing documents.
“He was all ears,” Stone said. “The president believes in transparency… he believes in the public’s right to know.”
“I am optimistic that the president is going to do the right thing.”
Stone goes on to claim that the documents will show that Lee Harvey Oswald was trained by the CIA and acted on their commands.
“Now, a very good White House source – not the president – told me that CIA Director Mike Pompeo has been lobbying the president to furiously not to release these documents.”
“Why? Because I believe they show Oswald was trained, nurtured and put into place by the CIA.”
“It sheds very bad light on the Deep State, the very same characters trying to take down our president right now.”
Many have often speculated that Oswald was part of a larger group and did not act alone, as has been the official story since 1963, the year of Kennedy’s death. However, these theories are ust pure speculation.
As Jeff Crouere said earlier on Townhall.com, the only way for complete trust and transparency is for full release of the documents.
“The President needs to strike an important blow for openness and transparency in government and allow the American people the opportunity to learn the complete story about the Kennedy assassination. Hopefully, nothing will interfere with the online disclosure of all of the JFK documents.
President Trump is being encouraged by members of both parties to fully release the files. A powerful supporter of full disclosure is U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, who said “Americans deserve a full picture of what happened on that fateful day.” Finally, after 54 years, it is time for the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
Fantasy is not fact,.....all the facts point to the feds & then mob working together....
I didn’t post a theory. I posted the truth. I have done enough research over the years to know what the truth is. Bush Sr. and his team KILLED JFK.
LBJs mistress was interviewed after the death of her son. LBJs son. It an eye opening interview. She names names. Alot of hands in the pot LBJ and yes BUSH sr.
“[CIA employees] had every reason to be suspicious of this untutored outsider who. . . had spent a lot of time in partisan politics. . .But this Agency gave me their trust from day one.”
– George H.W. Bush, remarks at CIA HQs, 1999
One thing is for sure: The Booshes have no problem sucking up the the Clintons AND the Obamas.
You would be mistaken. The Warren Commission didn't request the documents be sealed. It was instead a pre-existing governmental rule.
"That one hour movie of Lee Harvey Oswald spouting about his "Fair Play for Cuba" organization"
There was no movie. There was a radio program Oswald was asked to be on after he got arrested. There's nothing coincidental about it.
BTW, the person that shot the films of Oswald at the radio station and in the streets of New Orleans, used to be a Freeper. I knew him. He never wanted to reveal that, but I tell you now because he died a while back.
Roger Stone...an infowars.com contributor...Relying on Infowars... reminds me of the first time I noticed that the McDonalds has no dumpster. Think about it. ;^) Disinfowars pushes flat Earth nonsense, Nibiru nonsense, and, well, just to show how bad it is, it's banned as an article source here. Thanks Kaslin.
The Lincoln assassination investigation by Congress was similarly sealed. During and for a while after the Civil War, all the approaches to DC were under heavy armed guard. At one of the bridges leading out of the city, the officer in command rode up and told the soldiers on duty that at some point after dark, there could be a rider, and if legit, he’d give such and such a password. They said they understood, and the officer rode off. Some hours later, a horseman galloped up, was challenged, gave the correct password, and rode across, then on into the night. The rider was John Wilkes Booth. Odd that he had the right password, eh? :^) And there was no CIA in those days.
"Obviously, Donald TRUMP Was Behind the Kennedy Assassination, in his Pathologically Self-Obsessed Drive for Power!"
“I’ve watched Presidents die.” — I love how the X-Files handled the whole Grassy Knoll nonsense, putting the Cigarette Smoking Man *inside* a culvert on the hillside. There was otherwise no way to make it work, since cops thought the shots came from there and swarmed up, found nothing, no smell of discharged firearm, no casing, no one running from the scene, nothing.
I have some experience with the world of government agents and he acts, sounds and writes like somebody playing a part for one of our "three letter" agencies.
The term of art is "burning" an agent when they use one in some activity that gets him or her killed or captured. I think that Oswald was burned.
I don't really think that there's anything there in the remaining JFK papers: that was before computers and much magnetic media. All you had to do was find the papers and burn them to erase history.
Probably...
Party ownership of the print media
made it easy to manipulate public opinion,
and the film and radio carried the process further.
|
....... The Ministry of Truth, Winston's place of work, contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below. The Ministry of Truth concerned itself with Lies. Party ownership of the print media made it easy to manipulate public opinion, and the film and radio carried the process further. The primary job of the Ministry of Truth was to supply the citizens of Oceania with newspapers, films, textbooks, telescreen programmes, plays, novels - with every conceivable kind of information, instruction, or entertainment, from a statue to a slogan, from a lyric poem to a biological treatise, and from a child's spelling-book to a Newspeak dictionary. Winston worked in the RECORDS DEPARTMENT (a single branch of the Ministry of Truth) editing and writing for The Times. He dictated into a machine called a speakwrite. Winston would receive articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or, in Newspeak, rectify. If, for example, the Ministry of Plenty forecast a surplus, and in reality the result was grossly less, Winston's job was to change previous versions so the old version would agree with the new one. This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs - to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. When his day's work started, Winston pulled the speakwrite towards him, blew the dust from its mouthpiece, and put on his spectacles. He dialed 'back numbers' on the telescreen and called for the appropriate issues of The Times, which slid out of the pneumatic tube after only a few minutes' delay. The messages he had received referred to articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to rectify. In the walls of the cubicle there were three orifices. To the right of the speakwrite, a small pneumatic tube for written messages; to the left, a larger one for newspapers; and on the side wall, within easy reach of Winston's arm, a large oblong slit protected by a wire grating. This last was for the disposal of waste paper. Similar slits existed in thousands or tens of thousands throughout the building, not only in every room but at short intervals in every corridor. For some reason they were nicknamed memory holes. When one knew that any document was due for destruction, or even when one saw a scrap of waste paper lying about, it was an automatic action to lift the flap of the nearest memory hole and drop it in, whereupon it would be whirled away on a current of warm air to the enormous furnaces which were hidden somewhere in the recesses of the building. As soon as Winston had dealt with each of the messages, he clipped his speakwritten corrections to the appropriate copy of The Times and pushed them into the pneumatic tube. Then, with a movement which was as nearly as possible unconscious, he crumpled up the original message and any notes that he himself had made, and dropped them into the memory hole to be devoured by the flames. What happened in the unseen labyrinth to which the tubes led, he did not know in detail, but he did know in general terms. As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead. In the cubicle next to him the little woman with sandy hair toiled day in day out, simply at tracking down and deleting from the Press the names of people who had been vaporized and were therefore considered never to have existed. And this hall, with its fifty workers or thereabouts, was only one-sub-section, a single cell, as it were, in the huge complexity of the Records Department. Beyond, above, below, were other swarms of workers engaged in an unimaginable multitude of jobs. There were huge printing-shops and their sub editors, their typography experts, and their elaborately equipped studios for the faking of photographs. There was the tele-programmes section with its engineers, its producers and its teams of actors specially chosen for their skill in imitating voices; clerks whose job was simply to draw up lists of books and periodicals which were due for recall; vast repositories where the corrected documents were stored; and the hidden furnaces where the original copies were destroyed. And somewhere or other, quite anonymous, there were the directing brains who co-ordinated the whole effort and laid down the lines of policy which made it necessary that this fragment of the past should be preserved, that one falsified, and the other rubbed out of existence. |
Did your FRiend also shoot the footage of Cruz with FPFC & SDSU protesters in Canada? (Assuming it’s French Canada and not France) The signage was all in French.
No, it was a radio program. It was not filmed. There is an audio recording. I only said there was some film of Oswald at the station and in the street. It's a few minutes.
"I have some experience with the world of government agents and he acts, sounds and writes like somebody playing a part for one of our "three letter" agencies."
That's what you are projecting on to it. He acts like what he was. A wannabe nobody.
I have seen the film and it runs almost an hour. You have most likely seen a short segment of it.
You obviously haven’t read Oswald’s statement about his time in the Soviet Union. It’s in the Warren Report.
Read it and I think you’ll be surprised: other than a couple of misspellings, Oswald seems intelligent and articulate and not at all sympathetic to the Soviets.
Maybe age and experience?
How could anything look worse than all those idiots appearing daily somewhere trying to defend the magic bullet theory? The truth may be known but it won't come from the Warren Commission Report.
Closer to the truth than the Warren Commission Report.
OK start with the Roswell files and see how far you get. What could possibly need to be classified about a weather balloon after 60 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
