Who told you that? “Fry yhe Sclencr Guy!
I predict that by the year 2100, Daniel Rothman and the ICC will both have had a Great Dying of their own. RIP SOB. Now pay me, because I know I’m right.
Isn’t it cute?
After the East Anglia emails came out, no one said “global warming” anymore.
Got changed to “climate change”.
Now they’re back!
We’re all gonna die, just 100 years from now. From...wait for it...global warming!
Shhhh...do ya think they’ll remember when we couldn’t say that?!
In a similar thread I commented: So, what caused the previous 5 extinction events?
Granted, dinosaur farts might account for one, but that still leaves 4 others.
Hmmmn. Yeah, right.
But the “global warming” - IF it continues at all through to the 2100 - is NOW responsible for longer growing seasons, more aavailable acreage as more areas have more heat, MORE growth of EVERY plant on the planet by 12% to 27% due SOLELY to man’s recent release of additional to the atmosphere from its near-intolerable levels of 280 ppm 250 years ago!
We ARE NOW feeding some 6.5 billion people with the benefits of fossil fuels: Tractors, trucks, harvesters, combines, plows, seeders, threshers, mowers, sterile packing and preservative methods, chemical fertilizers and biocides and pesticides and food transportation and clean water, processed sewage and water treatment, irrigation pumps and pipes and sprinklers ....
JUST the food treatment and shipping and preservative ALONE feeds billions in every supermarket worldwide. Electricity, lights, power, heat, refrigeration, sterilization, .....
This is somethiing that I don’t care about, for i will be dust by then!
None of these aholes will be alive to see...well, nothing unusual.
5.56mm
Science uses the scientific method.
Climate “science” uses computer models.
Computer models do not use the scientific method.
Computer models are not science.
Predicting the future with computer models is akin to reading chicken entrails for the same purpose, except that chicken entrails have a better track record.
I’m not going to worry about it.
This is great news. No one else has given us nearly this long!
I’ll check back then.
Watermelons have been proven wrong on so many 10/20/50 year predictions that now they go out 100 years so no one alive today will see how wrong they were.
.
I predict that in the year 2301 Bartlett pears will come with purple polka dots.
.
Professor Daniel Rothman .... note that he doesn’t have a job where results are graded!!!!!!
It is the mainstream media that has made the environment more acidic.
I saw a show on the Science Channel just a few days ago, that not only predicted, but stated as a matter of fact, that in 10,000 years the Earth would be hotter than Venus!
I was already wondering, though, when the opening comparison of Earth and Venus as “twins” omitted any mention of the disparity in solar distance - AFAIK never mentioned in the program.
Uh huh! But what is his position on Man-made Global Warming? One catastrophe at a time!
There are significant flaws in his math (yes, I’ve read it, and am qualified to judge his work). More important though, he has just guaranteed lifetime funding for his research. Mission accomplished.
I thought the world was supposed to end today? Did I miss it?