Posted on 09/18/2017 11:40:24 AM PDT by rdl6989
Hillary Clinton said she wouldnt rule out challenging the legitimacy of the 2016 presidential election if Russian interference turned out to be deeper than previously thought.
No, I wouldn't rule it out, she said in an interview with NPR published Monday.
The defeated Democratic nominee stressed, however, that she does not believe there is a means to officially challenge the elections outcome.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Great term.
The night she lost was one of the most magical nights of my life. I relish her wanting to lose bigtime again, and again, and again. She is truly a walking Groundhog’s Day!
That is just mesmerizingly hilarious. LOL
The same b*tch who went after Trump BEFORE the election saying how we must respect the election results, REFUSES to respect the election results because she LOST
She has been questioning the legitimacy of the election ever since she lost.
She snapped. Needs help. Should stop chewing checkers.
If things stick to the "Color Revolution" plan (and that plan is being followed so far), Mueller will drop hints about a "bombshell" he's discovered starting at the end of October then spill the beans to the democrat mass media on the first or second of November.
Should that be the way things unfold, there will be blood and lots of it in DC as well as in other major cities. That's Hillary's wet dream, rioting nationwide similar to but worse than the riots of the sixties.
JMHo
Didn’t she say a week before the election that its “a danger to our democracy” if the loser of a Presidential election refuses to accept the outcome?
She would not have given us Gorsuch.
Her actions remind me of some of those crazy stalker chicks on Investigation Discovery when they’re rejected by their husbands or boyfriends. Single-minded, insanely focused, and truly dangerous. But Hillary is stalking US! It takes a special kind of lunacy to be able to stalk an entire nation and pull it off.
Can we have her arrested for harassment?
I wouldn't have given us Gorsuch either, I would have picked a Scalia type pro-life conservative instead of a guy who says abortion and gay marriage are "super settled law" and attends an ultra-leftist "social justice" church where he listens to sermons all day about tree-hugging and rights for "Dreamers"
Hillary is going berserk over the election. She is winner, along with her Hollywood disciples, of “The World’s Sorest Loser.” I would not be surprised if she come down with a nervous breakdown. She still cannot handle it.
Two different things entirely. The AG does not in any way need a special prosecutor to investigate anything. The AG and the FBI can investigate and ultimately prosecute Hillary till the cows come home. Bottom line, the justice department and the FBI answer directly to the president.
I found the same clips.
Whatever happened to "To say that you won't respect the results of the election.... That is a direct threat to our democracy. The peaceful transfer of power is one of the things that makes America, America. It is not a joke. Look, some people are sore losers, because , you know, they just gotta keep going."
Hillary Clinton 2016
"Hillary Clinton calls Trump a 'threat to democracy' during NC rally"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDO4SO88X8
And at a different rally, she says essentially the same thing.
"That is a direct threat to our democracy. "
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.