Posted on 09/05/2017 1:36:41 PM PDT by Pinkbell
This liberal site says they will be updating and adding Republicans as they come out with statements.
These are the Never Trump Republicans, but it's good to know. These people have no preconditions and are willing to do amnesty with no immigration reform. If no immigration reform is done, we will have this situation again - and will anyway because there are those here right now that don't qualify for DACA brought by their parents. Without reform, the can will be kicked down the road and there will be another amnesty. People will keep coming over illegally, which is I presume what they want.
How about protecting Americans ???
As someone else wrote on FR earlier today, these are undocumented Democrats. Time to primary each one of them.
If Houston's flooding was a problem of "no zoning" and "unrestricted expansion" then what is a city or nation with unrestricted borders/immigration? More flooding.
U. S. Citizens, sorry for those of you who would like to have a job. We’re putting your dreams on hold. There are more important dreamers around these days.
Still refer to them as “nightmares” and not just dreamers.
Durbin and Hatch introduced the DREAM Act in 2001...
Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors
2003 – DREAM Act (S.1545), stuck in committee review
2003 – DREAM Act of 2005 (S.2075), stuck in committee review
2005 – American Dream Act (H.R.5131), stuck in committee review
2006 – Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (S.2611) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2006, passed Senate
2007 – American Dream Act (H.R.1275), stuck in committee review
2007 – Security Through Regularized Immigration and a Vibrant Economy (STRIVE) Act of 2007 (H.R.1645) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2007, stuck in committee review
2007 – DREAM Act of 2007 (S.774), stuck in committee review
2007 – DREAM Act of 2007 (S.2205), failed to pass Senate
2007 – To Provide for Comprehensive Immigration Reform and For Other Purposes(S.1639) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2007, failed to pass Senate
2009 – DREAM Act of 2009 (S.729), stuck in committee review
2009 – American Dream Act (H.R.1751), stuck in committee review
2010 – DREAM Act of 2010 (S.3827), failed to pass Senate
2010 – CIR Act of 2010 (S.3932) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2010, stuck in committee review
2010 – DREAM Act of 2010 (S.3962), failed to pass Senate
2010 – DREAM Act of 2010 (S.3992), failed to pass Senate
2010 – DREAM Act of 2010 (H.R.6497), stuck in committee review
2011 – DREAM Act of 2011 (H.R.1842), stuck in committee review
2011 – DREAM Act of 2011 (S.952), stuck in committee review
2011 – Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2011 (S.1258) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2011, stuck in committee review
2013 – Border, Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act (S.744) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2013, passed Senate, stuck in House
2013 – Border, Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act (H.R.15) incorporated provisions of the DREAM Act of 2013, stuck in committee review
While Congress debates issues regarding comprehensive immigration reform, the Department of Homeland Security has implemented the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program, effective August 15, 2012, in hopes of providing some form of temporary relief to the DREAMers in the U.S. You can read more about the DACA Program here.
The DACA Program mirrors many of the requirements first proposed by Senators in the DREAM Act of 2001. As legislation around this issue evolves, LawLogix will continue to provide more information to our readers.
– See more at: http://lawlogix.mighty-site.com/what-is-dream-act-and-who-are-dreamers#sthash.6RZH0vuS.dpuf
just call them what they are illegal aliens
How did NY not make that list?
Agreed!
Deport them all.
That’s nine we MUST MUST MUST replace!!! Asap!!
He's in the district right next to the one I live in. His office is actually closer to where I live than my own Representatives is.
Time to pay Mr. Kinzinger (soon to be the FORMER Congressman) a visit with a few friends named Moose and Rocco.
The only question is how many senators it takes to override a presidential veto. The answer is 67.
I suspect 2/3 in the house would be even harder to get.
We, as conservatives, need to support every challenger to a RINO even if not in our state. A few of those who need to go in 2018 (Dec for Strange):
Strange
Flake
Heller
Corker
Hatch
“Why doesn’t Think Progress try to improve conditions in Mexico and further south?”
This has always been the elephant in the room. We should be exporting the best elements of capitalism, especially in our own hemisphere, but instead we prop up and rub elbows with scoundrels, cheats, and socialists, while their people suffer. These are the fruits of the left.
“Why doesn’t Think Progress try to improve conditions in Mexico and further south?”
My guess is that some of the billions of dollars drug cartels rake in want to see Mexico and points south in a static, corrupted state so that it’s easier to do business down there.
If Mexico starts to improve and becomes more like Canada, that means that laws would have to be enforced, corrupt politicians would have to be outed, and other terrible things that would raise the cost of corrupting their government to United States prices :-) .
They can dream in Mexico.
Since all republicans in the house are up for re-election,it will be impossible to get a majority in the house and DACA will die......UNLESS,they give Trump all his funding for the wall or huge tax cuts..He will get a huge concession out of this...
And not one Liberal will vote for any of them, regardless.
Morons
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.