Posted on 09/02/2017 10:53:21 AM PDT by ForYourChildren
"More children from the fit; less from the unfit—that is the chief issue of birth control." [1]
–Margaret Sanger, Birth Control Review
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, has an ignoble legacy as a racist who addressed the Ku Klux Klan and initiated a Negro Project to reduce the population of poor, uneducated African Americans whom she considered unfit to reproduce themselves. This Margaret Sanger—the real Margaret Sanger—is completely whitewashed in Parenthood propaganda, which deceitfully portrays Sanger as a champion of reproductive “choice.”
Even more incriminating than Sanger’s racism, however, is her close association with Nazism. Sanger was part of a community of American progressives who championed two remedies to get rid of “unfit” populations. The first was forced sterilization, which was Sanger’s preferred solution.
Sanger wanted to make it look like the sterilizations were voluntary. In a 1932 article, Sanger called for women to be segregated from the larger community onto “farms and homesteads” where they would be “taught to work under competent instructors” and prevented from reproducing “for the period of their entire lives.” If the women didn’t want to live this way, they could get out of it by consenting to be sterilized. [2]
The other progressive solution was “euthanasia,” which basically involved killing off the sick, the aged, and the physically and mentally disabled. One of Sanger’s colleagues, the California progressive Paul Popenoe, called for “lethal chambers” so that large numbers of “unfit” people could be systematically lined up and killed. [3]
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
So, H->! is really Hitler?
Does CNN know?
Sanger bump
There will be no real effort to "back pro-life candidates," because, as Weaver notes: "Ideas have consequences." The "idea" of socialism lies at the core of the Democrat Party's cultish and oppressive Progressive ideology; and, for socialism to work, then, population must be restrained. See below:
Please note especially the first paragraph highlighted and quoted below from the Liberty Fund Library "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), Chapter 1, final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay, "The Impracticability of Socialism":Note the writer's emphasis that the "scheme of Socialism" requires what he calls "the power of restraining the increase in population"--long the essential and primary focus of the Democrat Party in the U. S.:
"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.
I.44
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classes—the class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
I.45
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal life—imperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive strides—broadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so.
I.46
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove." EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON
"One Quarter of Black Population Missing from Abortion Genocide Says Dr. Alveda King"
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/one-quarter-of-black-population-missing-from-abortion-genocide-says-dr-alve
"Dr. Alveda King, the niece of legendary human rights campaigner, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., told a meeting of Priests for Life,..
“The great irony,” she said, “is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of.”
I don’t think she went to heaven when she died.
What a twisted soul.
.... 
Thirty minutes and really worth it.
BTTT
LATER
It appears there be only ONE way to purge our nation of liberal progressives.
Once in a conversation about abortion with a liberal friend he said he supports sbortion because it getxs rid od kids on welfare, poor children.
Almost 20 million killed,millions done away with in birth control and sterilization...I truly think dems were so successful in getting rid of their voters,they brought in Mexicans and hispanics to replace them.....All the dems need is 13 states with enough Mexicans to vote dem and 270 electoral votes..At that point blacks won’t be needed and will be done away with ..Hispanics want to be paid for their votes...Getting in front of the line for all the handouts will be their payoff.
Most people today have no idea on just how vile the Eugenics movement was....
Found a book over on Amazon - *A Man Out of Place*. SciFi or alternative history sort of thing - but one of the underlying memes was something the guy called ‘The Worm’ went on about how schools pushed what was obviously a eugenics mindset and soon it was considered the new normal.
Hed some other scifi kinds stuff, but the notion of this (eugenics) thought process being baked into a society was pretty damn chilling.
Liberals and progressives were pushing this in 1915 with book called.THE BLACK STORK.....Recently,AL GORE stated publicly that AFRICANS fertility needed to be managed...In 1921,Lothrop Stoddard wrote that blacks were so retarded they needed whites or Asians to tell them what to do...Who is Lothrop Stoddard...An Ex Ku Klux Klan leader who was on planned parenthood board of directors helping Margaret Sanger get rid of blacks,Jews and the poor....
Yes, "fake news" is nothing new. :)
You can sure ‘see the liberal’ and ‘coldness’ in Margaret Sanger in that video. The video shows more of her than I have seen before. Exactly what I expected too. Very evil soul in that face. Watching and listening to her I would easily expect this is the kind of person I expect would have MANY children’s bodies buried in her own back yard!
I had the same reaction. Thank the Lord her little “pal” did not win the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.