Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Aging Populations?

United Nations Press Release ^ | July 04, 2017 | United Nations

[ptsal]

Link location for download: https://archive.is/o/xUQas/www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html

Why is the United States funding the UN?

[Neidermeyer]

The answer is to give young people hope for the future , make being a mother a valued part of society again and reducing government intrusion that effectively makes us all serfs. Happy people procreate.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

First they tell us we must abort our babies because shut up.

Then they tell us we must bring in millions of Moolsim jihadis because we aren’t having enough babies.

See how that works?

[Lurkinanloomin]

Our freedoms and society stand in the way of their New World Order.

[ClearCase_guy]

+1

[PGR88]

This is a total fallacy

populations of nations have risen and fallen throughout history, for any number of reasons - war, disease, economics, culture, religion. Why do people accept that a nation’s population must always rise, or it is doomed.

This is ONLY due to the fact of modern finance and our corrupt government and monetary system. we live in a ponzi scheme, where massive government debt, to fund the nanny state, its cronies and social-engineering projects, must have an ever-large population to support the massive debt and consumption needed.

[mrsmel]

For non-First World countries, the UN’s own guidelines would consider this colonization and genocide.

[The Sons of Liberty]

Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Aging Populations?

Instead of letting raghead terrorists, gang members and other trash into OUR Country, let the population decline. In thiry or forty years we won't need many workers - robots will be doing it.

[BitWielder1]

Make western society welcoming for couples to have children again.

[ptsal]

Notice the off-the-radar date for the press release.

July 04, 2017

[fruser1]

Get rid of socialism and you’ll end your population problem.

When 10% of the population (poor) has more kids because they get more money for it from the government, and 80% (middle class) has fewer because it’s too expensive, you get a net population decline.

[GOPJ]

The answer is to give young people hope for the future , make being a mother a valued part of society again and reducing government intrusion that effectively makes us all serfs. Happy people procreate.

You're right. Besides our country had fewer people in the 50's and it was a pleasant place to live... children playing all over the place. Liberal elites don't 'get' the people of the United States are MORE than just cheap labor to produce wealth for them...

[Army Air Corps]

Ping.

[Army Air Corps]

Ping.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Good God.

[central_va]

There is no excuse or any reason to “replace” a population with a flood of immigrants. Ever.

[I want the USA back]

This was obvious, but it’s interesting that a part of the UN openly admits that’s the plan - get rid of the old, dying Whites and replace them (after taking all their money) with new, fertile savages.
What will it be like in 100 years? Will the country be prosperous or poverty-stricken? Easy answer: the people who built this country up will be relegated to the background, and the new arrivals will be in charge. So poverty-stricken.

[stanne]

Declining populations? They mean abortion and birth control. Funded and promoted by UN

[EagleUSA]

The socialistic sickness of the United Nations. What a pathetic, corrupt organization. And the USA keeps giving money to these sickos.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

No.

And people began to have fewer children after you began to flood their country with your "replacements" as far as Europe and the US goes.

Japan is finding it's balance after a major culture shock.

I notice that no one seems to worry about China and India's Declining and Aging populations. I wonder why that is.