Posted on 07/07/2017 12:47:27 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to anyone on the Clinton campaign. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.
The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clintons campaign she wouldnt let FBI agents go too far in probing the former secretary of state.
Lynchs lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff ever communicated with Amanda Renteria, who headed Clintons political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify.
The committee also wants to know if Lynch or any of her aides were in contact with former DNC chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz regarding the Clinton e-mail investigation, according to a three-page list of questions that Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein recently sent to Lynch at her New York apartment.
Senate investigators have combed through a transcript of Lynchs testimony before the House Judiciary Committee in July 2016. In retrospect, several of her statements strain credulity. But one in particular stands out, and could present legal problems for Lynch.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Loretta needs to avoid moths to avoid any more holes.
Lynch assured the political director of Clintons campaign she wouldnt let FBI agents go too far in probing the former secretary of state.
*************************************************************
This is not new. I read of this months ago.I am very, very glad this is getting more coverage.
Finally. We need more of this. A lot more.
I agree about wanting to see justice. I’m not holding my breath either, but I think there is a decent chance we might see justice served and criminals in prison, but I expect it will be a slow process.
I am hoping and praying that the reason for the seeming slow-roll of so many of these cases is that prosecutors are carefully building bullet-proof cases. It takes time to gather and vet all the evidence. It also takes time to give the perps opportunity to incriminate themselves. When liars keep talking, they eventually out themselves.
Hmmm, I wonder if this is the “fake” document that Comey fell for?
Whole passel of obammy people are dirty and belong in prison or the business end of a rope.
Like the feeble attempts at investigating Hillary, someone will tell congress to bring the Lynch investigation to a screeching halt. This whole mess is a house of cards. If Lynch is brought down then the Clinton’s would be exposed and that folks is never going to happen. Even Trump is not going after the criminals, why is that?
Bill was probably just trying to hit on her.
She's built like a black Hillary complete with lard butt and giant cankles.
Agreed
Why no grand jury, why no SP?
Too many cankles to process at one time. The only thing I feel sorry for is Loretta Lynch’s shoes. Those cankles on her look like Miss Piggy’s tree stumps.
Lynch will take the fifth, pubbies will will moan and cry “foiled again” and the committee can get back to the Russia witch hunt.
Good question and I would love to hear the answer.
You would think even some of the democrats would be sick of the Clinton crime cartel and want to be rid of them.
Bill looks like walking death - he’s not going to last forever. And THE PEOPLE would probably have more faith in democrat party if they actually policed their own.
What? A lot more talking and posturing by the congress critters?
We need grand jury indictments, criminal convictions and demonRATs going to jail ... by the bus load.
——recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clintons campaign she wouldnt let FBI agents go too far in probing the former secretary of state.——
It would appear that there was a leak in the Clinton dam
You know, I have been posting that for months. I wanted to see Holder, Lynch, Hillary, the bunch, weeping in the docket. Now I am thinking, maybe I was being juvenile. Do we really want them as targets of sympathy? Do we really want CNN to disappear? I am starting to think it is in our best interest to let the BSM continue with their “hair on fire” BS. Let those precious lo info voters continue to see Trump as the underdog. Let these prosecutions of the Deep Staters percolate along quietly, not reported, not generating sympathy, just quietly grinding in the wheels of justice...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.