Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump setting up Generals as Fall Guy (?)
LA Slimes ^ | June 29, 2017 | Bacevich

Posted on 06/29/2017 12:49:07 AM PDT by vooch

The Defense secretary’s response was both forthright and evasive. “We are not winning in Afghanistan right now,” he conceded, while promising that “we will correct this as soon as possible.” Mattis then unleashed a cloud of blather, promising “a change in our approach” so as “to do things differently” and devise “a more regional strategy” involving “across-the-board whole of government” collaboration. He offered no specifics.

The fact is that every couple of years since 2001, policymakers in Washington and commanders in the field (including McChrystal) have trotted out plans “to do things differently” in Afghanistan. Those plans have come in a multitude of colors and a variety of sizes. None have come anywhere close to “winning.”

Trump surely knows this. We cannot say for certain why the president has chosen to distance himself from this war that he inherited. But one possibility is this: Having learned through painful experience to recognize a losing proposition, he has no intention of being left holding the bag for this one.

The savvy Mattis must suspect that he is the designated fall guy. If not, he will discover it next year or the year after when Trump relieves himself of responsibility for a still unwon war and looks to pin the blame on someone else.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gwot; military; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: vooch
Just what is there to win?

They only have two things, opium, and islam!

A wise man once spoke "Beware the govt military industrial complex." He overlooked the "medical" branch in that statement.

21 posted on 06/29/2017 3:40:26 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (TETELESTI Read em and weep Lucy! Yer times almost up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Nobody ever sailed off the edge of the earth and came back to tell about it, that is until Columbus did. We know that there never was an edge to sail off of, but everybody was convinced of it so it was.

So many “nations” went into the area known as Afghanistan for their own leaders or rulers selfish reasons to conquer it. The populace, especially outside of Kabul are mostly ignorant but ignorance does not also mean they are stupid. The slaves brought to this country were ignorant but not stupid. It is that misconception the “less ignorant” world needs to grapple with and not see it as to win in that country.

Until their vast natural resources are exploited for the good of all in the country, they will do whatever is easiest to eek out a meager living to feed their families the best they know how. Know how, and are shown how. But first, peace must be won, not us. Japan was a warrior country until through the grace of God we came up with the atomic bomb first. What would have been an unimaginable human loss of life if we were to have invaded them, even when they knew they were whipped, would have been many millions killed. It is a bad image to say that because those who most likely would have been sacrificed in an invasion of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have been even worse in a conventional assault. That is not to mention all those who would have come from the entire island nation to help in their defense.

The only thing that would quell their defense worked out to be the realization there was none left. We are now facing the same realization in that general area. first, instead of coddling their “gods” in a foolish effort to “win their hearts”, we must first win their respect. We also know the only way to win their respect is to crush their “gods” with unimaginable force to show there is no refuge for the zealots no matter where they go to hide among the populace. Think Dresden, Berlin and many other places the German war machine tried to hide and we would not create no go zones in our effort to eradicate them.

Yes, we can “win” but the problem exists of our own making by allowing them, the Taliban and now ISIS, to define where the rfuge is that we will not go after them. The reality is War is Hell and until we bring their Hell upon them, then yes we or anybody else will not win.


22 posted on 06/29/2017 3:44:35 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vooch

We are in Afghanistan because the Obama Administration was protecting the growth and transport of opium.

Half the world’s opium is grown in Afghanistan, and the amount increases every year.

And who has been there for the last 16 years? We have.

And now we have an “opioid” crisis at home, where heroin is cheap and plentiful.

All this after a 46 year War on Drugs which began in 1971.

And you better believe the Swamp Denizens in DC are adequately paid from drug money to turn a blind eye to all this.

A pox on all their houses.


23 posted on 06/29/2017 3:47:13 AM PDT by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch
The fact is that every couple of years since 2001, policymakers in Washington and commanders in the field (including McChrystal) have trotted out plans “to do things differently” in Afghanistan.

Those plans only have ever called for different tactics, not a new strategy. And generally they have been hindered by political correctness. IMHO, changes in tactics are futile as long as our strategy remains the same; that is, building a central national government with an army that can control the place. More robust tactics might do better on the battlefield, but won't win in the end with that strategy. The truth is the vast majority of Afghans don't want a national government. They don't want any power over their tribe. The best we can hope for is to ally with some tribes against the others, like we did when we first went in and supported the Northern Alliance. I'm afraid Trump's generals will just change tactics again.

24 posted on 06/29/2017 3:48:17 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

They are such Obama like fall guys that Trump put himself on the line for Flynn...

Meanwhile the media campaigns for Obama as a fake news central instead of letting the Obamas put their foot in mouth in their own fakery. The press could merely be partisan and moderate the Bs of Obama, but no, they go much further than partisan, they act as Obama’s fall guy.


25 posted on 06/29/2017 3:52:40 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch
Trump empowers folks to do what they do best. This guy felt safe speaking the truth w/o worry of retribution. In Obama's Admin, the guy would either be used to show why we needed to abandon the area or be fired forthwith if that wasn't the Admin's current meme.

The premise of the article is crap designed to get the concern trolls all worked up. You know, the ones who see something that might be a "cause for concern" but who don't seem to ever do the FReepathon thing.

26 posted on 06/29/2017 3:56:09 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

I don’t pay attention to anything the media says.


27 posted on 06/29/2017 4:11:29 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals are in a state of constant cognitive dissonance, which explains their mental instability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
I'm no fan of Barack Obama, but I think you're characterization of his role in the Afghanistan mess is really overstated.

We're in Afghanistan today because there are two @ssholes named George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama who will go down as two of the worst presidents in the history of this country.

It's really that simple.

No offense to anyone who wears a uniform of the U.S. military, but I think you really have to ask yourself whether that is something you can even justify objectively from any moral or rational standpoint.

28 posted on 06/29/2017 4:11:31 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Responsibility is such a foreign concept to liberals. Everyone is responsible for their own lanes and their own actions. Trump doesn’t need fall-guys — democrats need falls guys/gals/gays because they inherently break laws just as sure as they breath.


29 posted on 06/29/2017 4:14:48 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

I think the generals Trump has hired are traditional uniparty, military-industrial-complex neocons. McMaster is probably worse than Mattis. They are trying to drag him into all out war in the Middle East, with Russia and North Korea, etc.

And in leaks such as what fueled this report, from at least Mattis sympathizers if not Mattis himself, they are trying to set Trump up as the fall guy either way—whether they succeed in dragging him into or war they don’t.


30 posted on 06/29/2017 4:16:35 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

There is nothing or no one in Afghanistan worth the money & lives we continue to waste there. The people & government of the country are totally corrupt - beyond help. If we need to keep on killing the terrorists there, bombs & missiles will suffice.


31 posted on 06/29/2017 4:26:28 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
"I see no hard thinking to determine what the goal of our presence in Afghanistan is."

Nathan, you are exactly right. In order to win in Afghanistan, we have to first determine what "winning" is. In other words, we need to have an overall goal and then develop a strategy and measure our progress towards the goal against that.

This article is just so much blather. If I have to hear another military "expert" tell us that Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires, I'm going to throw up. I'm sure Bacevich would have been at the bottom of the Himalyas telling Sir Edmund Hillary and crew how no one ever climbed it so it can't be done. One of the major obstacles to any goal in Afghanistan is resolving the unholy alliance between IS in Pakistan and the Taliban. Trump just met with the India prime minister, I wonder if Afghanistan was talked about. They may be part of a comprehensive solution.

In short, I believe we can "win" in Afghanistan. We have to have definable goals and develop strategies and policies in order to attain the goal. I believe the overall goal is the defeat of the Taliban and Al Qada and developing some type of stabile government that can ensure no future organization such as Al Qada can stand back up.
32 posted on 06/29/2017 4:30:37 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

It’s the new Russia.

They’re trying to say the same e thing with Tillerson over Qatar.


33 posted on 06/29/2017 4:32:20 AM PDT by Bogey78O (So far so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Obama eviscerate the military and did incredibly harm firing the BEST general officers. Much of what’s left are Obama’s quislings.


34 posted on 06/29/2017 4:37:23 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Yep.

Sometimes you have a go to “inside” guy who is the ax man. He gets the failing projects, and his arrival tells the team it is over.

I was that guy for a bit. I called it ‘project triage’. You save what you can and let the rest die.


35 posted on 06/29/2017 4:51:52 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Big difference:

Obama did not want to win.

Trump wants to win.


36 posted on 06/29/2017 4:52:32 AM PDT by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

To “win” in Afghanistan you must KILL EVERY LIVING THING...
WINNING


37 posted on 06/29/2017 4:54:43 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Some 24D on the poppy fields would also slow things down.

But that has been expressly forbidden.


38 posted on 06/29/2017 4:55:53 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: vooch

All for General Mattis. But what are we still doing in Afghanistan? What is our end game? What is the current strategy to achieve that? If we just intend to have a permanent base there composed mainly of jihadi hunters, fine. But any notion of a stable fairly modern government and nation is fantasy I think.


39 posted on 06/29/2017 5:09:46 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Bacevich is a very smart man.

He commanded an Armored Cavalry Regiment.

He knows from experience about command and luck.

He had some bad luck and it put an end to his Army career.

That was a damn shame because he might have done great things as a general.

He also lost a Son to our wars in that part of the world.

He’s a brilliant man and his opinion should be considered.

But his opinion should be considered in light of what happened to him.


40 posted on 06/29/2017 5:15:22 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson