Skip to comments.
EPA moves to kill Waters of the U.S. rule
The Washington Times ^
| June 27, 2017
| Ben Wolfgang
Posted on 06/27/2017 12:30:48 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: JohnyBoy
Well, that and the appointment of Goresuch to the SCOTUS...
21
posted on
06/27/2017 12:48:06 PM PDT
by
piytar
(http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
To: Rinnwald
22
posted on
06/27/2017 12:49:28 PM PDT
by
GraceG
("It's better to have all the Right Enemies, that it is to have all the Wrong Friends.")
To: jazusamo
The way obozo and the rest of his gestapo wrote that rule, your damn bathtub was under control of the US gummint!
So glad the grownups are back in charge!
23
posted on
06/27/2017 12:49:47 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
To: jazusamo; Donald J Trump
Wow ... actually rescinding regulations is rare. This is part of why I voted for Trump; we need much more of it.
24
posted on
06/27/2017 12:53:12 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
To: Drew68
25
posted on
06/27/2017 12:53:30 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
This is a very nice piece of winning! Now when the rain collects in a little puddle on your property, you will no longer be in danger of your property being declared a protected waterway to be controlled and managed by the federal government.
26
posted on
06/27/2017 12:59:12 PM PDT
by
lonevoice
(diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
To: jazusamo
If SCOTUS stayed it why can’t Trump tell EPA to just drop it? (Or, is nothing ever easy in government?)
27
posted on
06/27/2017 1:01:06 PM PDT
by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: GraceG
Is this the same stupid regulation they used to hit that rancher in Wyoming who built a duck pond on his property?I'm not sure if it was this rule or the Clean Waters Act.
28
posted on
06/27/2017 1:03:42 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
Sweet MAGA, the winning!!!!! Brace yourself, Nellie!!
To: jazusamo
msm and hollywood keep focusing on Russia and obstruction nonsense while Trump gets a million things accomplished and it’s not reported :)
That’s a good thing because it would be warped terribly by the MSMorons
30
posted on
06/27/2017 1:06:23 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The Left should know that if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
To: jazusamo
How do regulations ever *get* on the books?
When allowed outside of the legislative process and law, regulations seem free to come and go, last for years, then be removed, only to return again in one form or another.
What is a permanent answer?
31
posted on
06/27/2017 1:09:08 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
To: jazusamo
I’m okay with them revoking the U.N. River Navigator program started under Clinton as well. Federal control of these waterways always seems intrusive to me.
Granted the expansion of the concept under Obama was outrageous.
32
posted on
06/27/2017 1:18:21 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
To: jazusamo
This is all great winning, but we need something that prevents the next swing in administrations from putting this all back again. There needs to be legislation (law) that puts limits on what the executive can do willy-nilly.
33
posted on
06/27/2017 1:21:23 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
To: LostPassword
How will I be able to properly care for the puddle that shows up in my back yard when we have rain? In many areas of the country, the water belongs to the government, not you. But at least now with this rule obliterated, you'll be able to fill in the puddle hole. At least we have a partial win!
34
posted on
06/27/2017 1:21:29 PM PDT
by
roadcat
To: jazusamo
Good; but talk of “winning” is premature until the rule chane is codified into law so the Democrats can’t reverse it.
To: jazusamo
Another piece of the Liberal Messiah’s legacy bites the dust.
36
posted on
06/27/2017 1:26:13 PM PDT
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: jazusamo
Lawsuits to be filed in 3, 2, 1...
37
posted on
06/27/2017 1:31:11 PM PDT
by
subterfuge
(Build the damn wall...)
Pass a law defining navigable waters as that which is is used for interstate commerce by vessels of 100 tons or greater. NOT in-state waters as that is a state’s responsibility.
To: jazusamo
Nothing fishy about this. Just more water down our backs as we submerge ourselves in the oasis of MORE WINNING!!!
:)
39
posted on
06/27/2017 1:45:57 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
To: 43north
Why does the EPA want to kill maxine waters?
Same reasons everyone else does!
40
posted on
06/27/2017 2:03:37 PM PDT
by
mistfree
(It's a very uncreative man who can't think of more than one way to spell a word.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
