Posted on 06/26/2017 10:15:13 PM PDT by guido911
Pretty good stuff.
That’s exactly what pisses the Dems off. All this collusion and betraying the US of A, and the Russians turn around screw them over for their troubles. Next time they’ll collude with China. They deliver.
Some great material in here.
President Trump needs to tweet this.
Actually, tweet the link to this FR thread and call attention to FR and the video itself.
btt
Thanks man. Not like me to post something like that.
Ever.
Too mushy.
But once won’t kill me :)
I love the smell of 3 CNN resignations in the morning. :)
So basically:
~No proof of Russia collusion.
~There are a lot of leaks (which he says are good), but no proof that Trump colluded which he believes (as do I) that certainly would have leaked by now.
~He says people talk about the media and ethics which is essentially bull.
~He says they have to fill air time on cable, make money, and get good ratings - which this story does.
~Their liberal viewers want to hear the Russia story, so that is what they are giving them.
~After the Paris Accord, Jeff Zucker ordered them to stop covering it after a day and a half and get back to Russia.
~He says they go harder after Trump than Obama (duh!) because their liberal viewers would be mad if they had gone after Obama and like them going after Trump.
~He says Trump is right to call it a witch hunt because they don’t have proof and would have by now.
All of this is so damning for CNN. I read tonight on Twitter that Project Veritas has more top CNN people saying the Russia story is B.S. I hope so.
I feel somewhat sorry for this guy, and I shouldn’t. He knowingly was involved in tarnishing the President with a fake narrative, but he admitted to it and seemed to feel a small degree of guilt over it (although not enough to speak out). He’ll lose his job, and CNN will try to say he is one guy who went rogue and doesn’t represent the views of their network, that their network is serious, blah, blah, blah. If they get more, however, it becomes harder to spin away.
Also, CNN just got caught in the fake news story about Russia, and three people lost their jobs over it.
Breitbart exposed it:
All Russia stories must now be reviewed by Top Execs at CNN:
Three people resigned:
They got caught before that saying that Comey was going to testify and say that he hadn’t told Trump that Trump wasn’t under investigation. False! They had to retract that. They also pimped out the NYT story that even Comey called false.
I think the most interesting part was actually that someone counted, and CNN has mentioned Russia nearly 16,000 times during Trump’s tenure as President! Wowza! Props to whoever kept count!
CNN doesn’t get it. If they would just admit their bias and be open about who they are, it would be totally different. Instead, they feign objectivity and express outrage if anyone dares question them. It’s obvious they choose what to cover, how to cover it, the angle to cover it from, how much time to give it, and the proper level of outrage we should give something. What they cover is overwhelmingly anti-Trump and benefits the Democrats. If this is pointed out, they merely act as though (and their viewers are convinced this is true by the way) that the reason this occurs is that Republicans are just scandal ridden or bad people and the Democrats are much more pure. This is why we see nothing on the NSA/FBI spying scandal exposed by Circa and minimal if any coverage on Lynch under investigation, Bernie under FBI investigation, and Hillary under investigation by the Senate Judiciary Committee. This is why they are still calling Trump a liar with respect to Obama wire tapping when there was a lot of truth to what he said. Maybe it wasn’t Trump Tower directly, but it was his associates and possibly himself unmasked.
Let’s not even forget the times they were caught lying to protect Hillary during the campaign or the times they were caught colluding with the Democrats and Hillary’s campaign. I wrote a substantial article here:
http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/11/cnn-lies-multiple-times-to-help-hillary.html
A Twitter user has been chronicling all of the lies of CNN here. Incredible work in 3 volumes!
https://twitter.com/i/moments/876646515325980673
https://twitter.com/i/moments/876655943517384709
https://twitter.com/i/moments/876891388725645312
Zucker is out there calling CNN “The Most Trusted Name In News”. Nope. They could be, but they are not. They are the media, PR arm of the DNC.
Don’t think so, Jeff:
http://pagesix.com/2017/06/19/jeff-zucker-viewers-trust-cnn-more-than-ever/
To the rest of you: you're not looking far enough down the road.
This gives Trump the political cover to fire Mueller's lying Clinton-lackey ass without any repercussions.
Oh, and three will get you five, Trump will have Sessions or someone vacuum up all of the "so-called" evidence, and work product, behind Mueller's planned hit hob.
Even money on whether he then traces it directly back to McCain, and/or McConnell and/or Ryan (let alone the Dems)...
To the rest of you: you’re not looking far enough down the road.
This gives Trump the political cover to fire Mueller’s lying Clinton-lackey ass without any repercussions.
Screw that. This is an open-and-shut case of libel (actual malice).
Wouldn't you like to see CNN put into court-ordered receivership? Say, under Rush Limbaugh as an "unbiased" holder with media experience?
In a word....oh, yeah.
I don't think it's a knockout blow, but it's a pretty heavy piece of straw on the camel's back.
CNN has been on the defensive for a couple months, and that is not a good place to be. When you feel a need to tell the public you are most trusted, it means you are not (most trusted).
Voter Fraud is my number one issue looking forward to 2018 and 2020. How the Russian Election story, and its eventual unmasking, can help eliminate voter fraud is, to me, the big story here. Any other Wins are also good, but if we don’t stop voter fraud our country is dead.
I think the MSM runs the Democrat Party and can do or say anything they want. They run the USA and not the Federal Government which is just the executive branch for the MSM. 95%+ of the deep state bureaucrats are Democrats and by default under the control of the MSM.
I think the MSM runs the Democrat Party and can do or say anything they want. They run the USA and not the Federal Government which is just the executive branch for the MSM. 95%+ of the deep state bureaucrats are Democrats and by default under the control of the MSM.
<><> Title 18 U.S.C. §1341, Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government for funding (may involve several felonies and could include forgery);
<><> 18 U.S.C.§1027 False statements and concealment of facts in relation to funding documents required by ERISA enacted 1974 and other possible offenses including civil and/or criminal RICO violations.
<><> 18 U.S.C. §§1961-68 (RICO Act)18 U.S.C. §1001 (making false Statements to Agents of the US Government regarding federal funding),
<><> 18 U.S.C. §241(Conspiracies Against Civil Rights). Violation of Civil Rights under Color of law and conspiracy. Conspiring with others to violate conservative students 4th amendment rights.
<><> Possibly full investigations centering on RICO conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. §1962(c) could be warranted because (1) the persons (2) were employed by or associated with an enterprise (3) that engaged in or affected interstate commerce and that (4) the persons operated or managed the enterprise (5) through a pattern (6) of racketeering activity, and (7) the taxpayers were injured by reason of the pattern of racketeering activity.
<><> Alleged Offenses could include Violation of Rights which prohibits in relevant part, two or more persons (from conspiring) to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District
<><> Title 18 U.S.C. §2 41 Conspiracy Against Constitutional mandates in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of having so exercised the same . . . See, 18 U.S.C. §241.
=========================================
Taxpayers demand the following agencies commence investigations of liberal campus activities at once:
<><> FBI Wire Fraud Division
<><> IRS-Fraud Unit
<><> Department of Justices Office of the Inspector General,
<><> Department of Commerces Office of Inspector General.
<><> DOJs Criminal Division Public Integrity Section
<><> DOJ Criminal DivisionOrganized Crime and Gang Section.
============================================
ACTION NOW-Contact your Representative and Senators Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
TALKING POINTS: contact the FCC to examine the status of CNN's ability to broadcast and determine CNN's discriminatory activity against conservatives, conservative presidents and conservative viewers.
Not even like eating a slightly too large hot fudge sundae?
I view it as a sort of independent divisions of the same company. All have the same end-goal, each responsible for a different product. The press, the politicians, the bureacrats, the schools, the entertainment industry, the courts, business interests, and even the churches are in on it.
There is a synergy there. The MSM and politicians reinforce what the schools teach.
"Which branch is taking the lead" varies depending on where the talents lie. Right now the politician division is weak, and the IC is using the MSM to drive the action.
>>The squealing will begin about recording private conversations, yet Mike Wallace made a Career of it.
The LA Times shielded candidate Barack Obama when they had (and still have? does it even still exist?) footage of Obama toasting an Islamic terrorist supporter at some Palestinian event (I think) in California. Latte Times claims they wouldn’t release it since it was a private dinner. If a candidate was at a Klan rally or NAZI dinner would it be kept out of print?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.