Lock her up, lock her up.
Awan you to turn yourself in, Debbie, and agree to testify against Hillary.
She also sought to find out how much House authorities might know about her internet usage, asking “Are members monitored?”
One would hope so.
L
“I’m really very stupid and arrogant, but I blame the voters who elected me”
Shouldn’t she be in Protective Custody for being such an admitted National Security Threat and Possible Traitor?? I hear Cuba is nice rightnow
Is there a law against criminal stupidity?
Isn’t that along the line of the bank teller embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars and blaming the Head Teller & Bank Manager because they left him alone on occasion.
Like the ‘man’ said
LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISEASE
These idiots are getting bolder by the day.
In Virginia, One Lib candidate for Governor race is admitting to being a Progressive, voted for BOSCARE and is running an ad with BO in it praising him for being a good ‘player’ BUT my ‘old eyes’ suspect a little photo shop in that clip...something doesn’t look right BUT THEN AGAIN, BO is in it so it comes out as suspicious to me...
The other one admits to being a doctor and says DT is a narcissistic maniac while telling what a good dem he is.
One of them mentions he was instrumental in banning smoking in restaurants
I am ‘afraid’ the D will win, Rs are running a RINO Gillispie with the reported lead, I ‘like’ Stewart but think he has thrown too many ‘hand grenades’ and the last, Wagner(??) is USNA Grad but the two appear to be ‘acing each other out....would like to see a little ego swallowing and if nothing else ALL of them get together to back whoever wins the primary...
What happened to the ‘Russians’?
Bet they had access to Podesta’s emails too.
This is unraveling......
Read the whole article at the link.
1st exchange
Hearing: House of Representatives Budget (EventID=105955)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2946&v=0aB5S0dPagU
2md exchange
Hearing: House of Representatives Budget (EventID=105955)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4084&v=0aB5S0dPagU
It’s somebody else fault for her violations? How stupid can she be? I thought she was a lawyer...
bttt
In a May 17 appropriations hearing on Congress’ administrative budget, Wasserman Shultz said she had violated the policies “for years and years and years.” She also sought to find out how much House authorities might know about her internet usage, asking “Are members monitored?”
What dark secret would Dems be so terrified of being revealed. Vote fraud? Nah. Common stuff for them. Browsing porn sites? Who’d care? Certainly not the MSM. Murder conspiracy? SOP. The only thing that might be over the line, even by Dem “standards” would be discovery of a pedophile ring.
On the wall of the Proctologists Association is a picture of Debbie Wasserman-Schulz labelled “The Perfect Asshole”.
Her contractors were stealing information from congress’s committees - espionage - and to protect the contractor she re-titles him “advisor”. That makes her complicit.
Before anyone gets too excited about this latest display of stupidity on the part of a Democrat, one should consider the context in which the quote “for years and years” is found and what exactly she’s complaining about when she blamed the IT chief for her stupidity.
The context of this entire exchange is that of using Dropbox, a cloud based file sharing system of which I’m sure many reading this are aware.
So what she was saying when she was saying “(I’ve been doing this) for years and years” is she was saying she was using Dropbox for years and years. It’s not clear if she meant that as just using the service for that long or actually using the service for storing sensitive Congressional documents for that long. But it really doesn’t matter.
Her complaint to the IT chief that this “policy” wasn’t communicated to every House member, “only” to each member’s IT head, and this is key, was to complain that the policy forbidding use of Dropbox (DUH) to store important (supposed to be) secure government data, enacted only LAST OCTOBER (DOUBLE DUH) that policy wasn’t clearly (”clearly” according to Wasserdunderhead) communicated to every House member. It was “only” given to each House memeber’s IT staff who was then to communicate said policy to everyone else in each member’s office. And that’s Wasserbubblehead’s complaint: she’s saying with all her stupidity on full display: “this policy fobidding Dropbox use by House members while on the secure network should have been better communicated than it was”
She’s saying that to cover her &$$, because she now realizes she was using Dropbox AFTER the policy was officially enacted (Oct 2016).
Two things obviously stupid (beyond Wasserman herself of course): ONE, that anyone in Congress would even THINK of using Dropbox, or any other third party file sharing app, WHILE on the “secure” network of the House AND use it to store apparently sensitive Congressional documents!!
On top of all that it took the IT geniuses until October of 2016 to realize Dropbox (and any other file sharing app) might actually be a security risk!!! (DUHHHHHH)
This is your government at work people. It’s a wonder the entire world doesn’t know every secret we have (who knows maybe they do!)
But with all that stupidity on display, one thing remains: Wasserman is cunning enough (I won’t say “smart” because she’s stupid obviously) but cunning enough to realize that if she can make enough hay out of this “communication of important policy” issue, if she can open that door wide enough, she’ll be able to squeak her stupid use of Dropbox “for years and years” while on the government network through that opening and possibly even get her criminal “aide” off the hook.
So that’s what’s going on there, and because the government IT guys were too stupid to realize in the beginning that third party file sharing apps MIGHT just be a security risk YEARS ago, this beastly “woman” can make enough of a case that she didn’t really violate any policy, at least not “intentionally”. And as we know that’s all it takes to get the pigs off of any charge on this Animal Farm.
And by the way, Debs, honey, while you’re busy instructing the IT department how best to do their job, you might want to investigate the technology known as a “hairdryer”.
(How that fresh from the shower look became even close to being fashionably acceptable certainly boggles at least my mind)