Before anyone gets too excited about this latest display of stupidity on the part of a Democrat, one should consider the context in which the quote “for years and years” is found and what exactly she’s complaining about when she blamed the IT chief for her stupidity.
The context of this entire exchange is that of using Dropbox, a cloud based file sharing system of which I’m sure many reading this are aware.
So what she was saying when she was saying “(I’ve been doing this) for years and years” is she was saying she was using Dropbox for years and years. It’s not clear if she meant that as just using the service for that long or actually using the service for storing sensitive Congressional documents for that long. But it really doesn’t matter.
Her complaint to the IT chief that this “policy” wasn’t communicated to every House member, “only” to each member’s IT head, and this is key, was to complain that the policy forbidding use of Dropbox (DUH) to store important (supposed to be) secure government data, enacted only LAST OCTOBER (DOUBLE DUH) that policy wasn’t clearly (”clearly” according to Wasserdunderhead) communicated to every House member. It was “only” given to each House memeber’s IT staff who was then to communicate said policy to everyone else in each member’s office. And that’s Wasserbubblehead’s complaint: she’s saying with all her stupidity on full display: “this policy fobidding Dropbox use by House members while on the secure network should have been better communicated than it was”
She’s saying that to cover her &$$, because she now realizes she was using Dropbox AFTER the policy was officially enacted (Oct 2016).
Two things obviously stupid (beyond Wasserman herself of course): ONE, that anyone in Congress would even THINK of using Dropbox, or any other third party file sharing app, WHILE on the “secure” network of the House AND use it to store apparently sensitive Congressional documents!!
On top of all that it took the IT geniuses until October of 2016 to realize Dropbox (and any other file sharing app) might actually be a security risk!!! (DUHHHHHH)
This is your government at work people. It’s a wonder the entire world doesn’t know every secret we have (who knows maybe they do!)
But with all that stupidity on display, one thing remains: Wasserman is cunning enough (I won’t say “smart” because she’s stupid obviously) but cunning enough to realize that if she can make enough hay out of this “communication of important policy” issue, if she can open that door wide enough, she’ll be able to squeak her stupid use of Dropbox “for years and years” while on the government network through that opening and possibly even get her criminal “aide” off the hook.
So that’s what’s going on there, and because the government IT guys were too stupid to realize in the beginning that third party file sharing apps MIGHT just be a security risk YEARS ago, this beastly “woman” can make enough of a case that she didn’t really violate any policy, at least not “intentionally”. And as we know that’s all it takes to get the pigs off of any charge on this Animal Farm.
Excellent deconstruction. Yet, I believe her constituents cant let cunning Debbie off the hook. Debbie is not in nursery school---she's a Congressman. She must be forced to take responsibility. Her constituents need the salient details.
Debbie Wassermann Schultz's district.
FREEPER ACTION PROJECT - TALKING POINTS - DO THIS NOW
Debbie Wassermann Schultz's constituents need to know what’s going on.
LINKS TO FLORIDA MEDIA OUTLETS http://www.abyznewslinks.com/unitefl.htm
FBI TIP PAGE---https://tips.fbi.gov
CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
===========================================
TALKING POINTS: (HAT TIP FOURTY SEVEN)
<><> Debbie's complaint to the IT chief that this “policy” wasn’t communicated to every House member, “only” to each member’s IT head.
<><> her cunningness involves the policy forbidding use of Dropbox (DUH) to store important (supposed to be) secure government data, enacted only LAST OCTOBER that policy wasn’t clearly ”clearly communicated to every House member."
<><> Wasserman is cunning enough to realize that if she can make enough hay out of this “communication of important policy” issue, if she can open that door wide enough to use the Dropbox excuse, she'll get herself and her criminal “Paki aide” off scot-free.