Posted on 04/28/2017 7:07:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
Bill Nye has some detestable ideas about humanity. This shouldn't surprise anyone. Many environmental doomsdayers share his totalitarian impulses (he has toyed with the idea of criminalizing speech he dislikes) and soft spot for eugenics.
In his Netflix series, "Bill Nye Saves the World," the former children's television host supplies viewers with various trendy notions to adorn his ideological positions with the sheen of science. In the final episode, Nye and his guests contemplate a thorny "scientific" question: How can the state stop people from having "extra kids"?
All of this was pretty familiar to me, and not only because the panel sounded like a ChiCom planning meeting. The Nye segment, it turns out, was just a repetition of a 2016 NPR article on overpopulation featuring Travis Rieder.
"Should we have policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed world?" asked Reider and others who were pondering the "ethics of procreation." The article is titled "Should We Be Having Kids in the Age of Climate Change?" In it, Rieder, a philosopher with the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins University, scaremongers a class of college students about The End of Days and the immorality of having children. NPR describes: "The room is quiet. No one fidgets. Later, a few students say they had no idea the situation was so bad." It's not.
"Here's a provocative thought," Rieder says. "Maybe we should protect our kids by not having them." This is provocative in the way a stoner wondering why airplanes don't run on hemp is provocative. That's because the entire case for capping the number of children rests on assumptions entirely devoid of scientific or historical basis.
In 1798, Thomas Malthus wrote that "the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man." At that point, there were maybe a billion humans on Earth, so we might forgive him for worrying. In 1800, the life expectancy of the average British citizen -- Britain then being the leading light of the world -- was 39 years. Most humans lived in pitiless poverty that is increasingly rare in most parts of the contemporary world.
Now, had Nye been around in the early 19th century, he'd almost surely have been smearing anyone skeptical of the miasma theory of disease. The problem is he lacks imagination; he's unable to understand that science is here to help humanity adapt and overcome, not constrict it. Anyway, 7-plus billion people later, extreme poverty was projected to fall below 10 percent for the first time ever in 2015. Most of those gains have been made in the midst of the world's largest population explosion.
Additionally, it is reported that because of the spread of trade, technological advances and plentiful fossil fuels, fewer people are hungry than ever; fewer die in conflicts over resources; and deaths due to extreme weather have been dramatically declining for a century. Over the past 40 years, our water and air have become cleaner, despite a huge spike in population growth. Some of the Earth's richest people live in some of its densest cities.
It's worth remembering that not only was early progressivism steeped in eugenics but early '70s abortion politics was played out in the shadow of Paul Ehrlich's population bomb theory. Former Vice President Al Gore has already broached the idea of "fertility management." Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg mentioned a few years ago, "Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
You thought right. Today, abortion is used as a means of exterminating a class of human deemed unworthy of life -- those with Down syndrome.
We live in a world where Ehrlich protege John Holdren -- who, like his mentor, made a career of offering memorably erroneous predictions (not out of the ordinary for alarmists) -- was able to become a science czar in the Obama administration. Holdren co-authored a book in late 1970s called "Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment," which waded into theoretical talk about mass sterilizations and forced abortions in an effort to save hundreds of millions from sure death. Nye is a fellow denier of one of the most irrefutable facts about mankind: Human ingenuity overcomes demand.
Now, just because something hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it can't happen in the future. But the evidence against Malthusianism is stronger now than it has ever been. And, of course, not everything about human existence can be quantified. This is the point. Talking about humans as if they were a malady that needs to be cured is, at its core, immoral. And listening to a man who has three residences lecture potential parents about their responsibilities to Mother Earth is particularly galling.
Although many thousands of incredibly smart and talented people engage in real scientific inquiry and discovery, "science" is often used as a cudgel to browbeat people into accepting progressive policies. Just look at the coverage of the March for Science last week. The biggest clue that it was nothing more than another political event is that Nye was a speaker. "We are marching today to remind people everywhere, our lawmakers especially," he told the crowd, "of the significance of science for our health and prosperity." Fortunately, our health and prosperity have blossomed despite the work of Nye and his ideological ancestors.
and while we're at it... 
I assume Nye is OK with people of Mid-East or Africa having many children - which they do. The upshot here is he means white people in developed countries.
My guess is, in their relationship, neither one pretends to be the male.
He’s revolting to look at.
This is making the rounds on twitter.
An episode of Bill Nye where he has someone explain there can only be a male or female....
At the 8:38 mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLd3O0O0k-8
Dishonest bill nye is repulsive. This misrepresenting carnival - barker makes up crap as he goes, misinforming the gullible and ignorant.
Another Hollywood fraud. Went to the Al Gore School of Scam-O-Rama.
I find it interesting that all these folks who insist the earth is overcrowded refuse to do anything about it. They should leave...
... How can the state stop people from having “extra kids...
He has a brother and a sister. Which of the three are the “extra kids?”
Any of us can interact with a less than attractive person if that person has decent morality.It’s Nye’s belief system that makes him very hard to look at.
Oh, but they are. By pushing abortion so strongly in minority areas they are ensuring that many of those they find repugnant are never born. By banning DDT as an insecticide they ensured an explosion of malaria in Africa, killing almost entirely those they regard as subhuman and repulsive. It is who they are doing it too that is so very revealing.
Yeah, and the girl flips the coin, it lands on X (girl), she says “some people are just lucky I guess”
They started with the anti male stuff a long time ago. Then, it was funny ish. Now it’s pervasive, in your face, white male is stupid, evil, the butt of all jokes in advertising.
True.
must you post pictures of Ki-Ki Keillor...? my God, man, have you no sympathy for your fellow browsers...?
Chris Plante was just talking about that meme.
This is very typical of Leftist environmentalism. Pollution is bad - but only when Western countries pollute (I don't remember 80's environmental activists ever complaining about Soviet or Chinese pollution, nor today in any Third World country). Overpopulation is bad, but only when people in developed countries have children (even though most developed countries aren't even producing children at replacement rates). You can't complain about overpopulation in Africa or the rest of the Third World, that would be "racist", even though its in the Third World that people have more children than their economies and infrastructures can sustain.
The bottom line is that "environmentalism" isn't so much about conservation or nature as it is another means to socially and economically cripple western nations in favor of the Third World.
I always thought this guy was a clown.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.