Posted on 04/18/2017 1:00:21 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I’m not sure who Allan Smith at Business Insider ran into who put a bug in his ear to talk to Trump confidant Chris Ruddy, but it must have been one heck of a conversation. The bottom line is pretty much the summation found in the title of this article. In order to avoid any more angst or consternation around Supreme Court nominations, Trump could short circuit the entire discussion by getting Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire now rather than trying to stick it out for four more years. And what would she get in return? A promise that the President would nominate the same guy Barack Obama tried to put on the court.
Chris Ruddy, a confidant of President Donald Trump, told Business Insider in a Monday interview that Trump should cut a deal with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. His proposition: Replace her on the bench with Judge Merrick Garland, President Barack Obama’s choice to fill Justice Antonin Scalia’s vacated seat in 2016.
Ruddy, who wrote about his opposition to the Senate invoking the so-called nuclear option to help get Judge Neil Gorsuch confirmed to the Supreme Court, said Trump nominating Garland to the court would be a “huge move.”
“I think they made a big mistake by pulling the nuclear option,” Ruddy said. “I wrote about it. I said they should not have done it. I think that he still should pick Merrick Garland and do a deal. Ruth Bader Ginsberg wants to retire, and I think they should swap her out, give her an offer where they would put Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court.”
This actually sounds like a brilliant plan except for the small detail of virtually everything involved in it being insane. First of all, Ruddy may be an old friend of the President’s and a trusted ally, but he’s not advising him on day to day White House operations. If he was he’d already be fighting Steve Bannon and Jared Kushner for desk space adjacent to the Oval Office. And if this is the sort of advice he’d be dispensing, I doubt he’d be in the building for long.
But let’s just say this was seriously under consideration. How much worse of a disaster could it be? The Senate GOP expended a vast amount of political capital and set off a firestorm by deciding to keep Garland’s name out of committee and waiting for the last election to wrap up. There were and still are plenty of conservatives who remain skeptical of President Trump and are not inclined to go along with many of his agenda items, but the one thing they can all agree on was that putting Neil Gorsuch on the bench was worth the pain of the trip. They also know that Trump has a list of other, similarly qualified and inclined judges in his pocket should he need to fill another vacancy and that keeps some from barking at him too loudly on other issues. Pushing Trump to do a deal like this would basically drain all the remaining conservative good will out of his pool.
That entire argument skips right past the question of why Trump would feel like he needs to make a deal. The filibuster is dead and gone. Provided he doesn’t go off of his list and nominate his wife or something, he can pretty much put anyone up he likes. Where is the incentive to make a deal with Ruth Bader Ginsburg? She can stay on the court for as long as she likes.
And what sort of incentive would Ginsburg have to make such a “deal” in the first place? First of all, would she feel 100% confident that Trump would hold up his end, particularly if it was done in private? He doesn’t get to nominate anyone until she’s at least announced her retirement, if not actually left the building. The President could still turn around and nominate anyone he wished. And if the deal was made in public Ginsburg would be further damaging the court by making public a dirty little secret which everyone knows but nobody wants to talk about. The Justices are supposed to be outside the political system. That’s why they have jobs for life. We all know that they would like to be able to pick a time to retire when the “correct” party holds the White House to nominate their successor, but they don’t generally say it. A “deal” such as this would tear the mask off entirely and show that it’s a rigged and highly politicized game.
I suppose the real exit question for all of you is whether or not anyone thinks that Trump is actually that crazy. That list of judges may have been one of the deciding factors which finally got him the support in the GOP he needed in a very, very tight election. I seriously doubt he’d get the GOP nomination for a second term if he put up Garland’s name. And could Garland even get confirmed? He didn’t make it out of committee last time so what makes us think he would now? The President could be slitting his own wrists politically and getting zero for it in return.
Bad deal, if I ever saw one. Sounds like something a desperate lefty, or an establishment hack would dream up.
“In order to avoid any more angst or consternation around Supreme Court nominations, Trump could short circuit the entire discussion by getting Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire now rather than trying to stick it out for four more years. And what would she get in return? A promise that the President would nominate the same guy Barack Obama tried to put on the court.”
Preposterous. Garland might—or might not—be marginally better than Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg, but even if she agreed to the arrangement, it would not “avoid any more angst or consternation around Supreme Court nominations.”
The Dims will fight every nominee who they don’t think is hard left with brass knuckles, while the Repulsicans will fight back with a plastic spatula.
When someone dies, that is God’s plan, not ours...so God will take the Judge when He is ready...
Since when did we start listening to what these media, talking heads and radio show hosts say, I thought we were suppose to listen to what God says...
Worst idea ever.
What? We don’t want a filthy liberal. There would be nothing ‘fun’ about it.
His base knew there would be at least two more vacancies during Trump's term, and they expect those vacancies to be filled with conservatives.
Trump's base does not expect horse-trading with Supreme Court vacancies. That would be a betrayal on the order of Benedict Arnold.
-PJ
The people who thought this up need to find something else to do. Maybe a high end lawn care service for the trendier areas around DC.
This is the stupidest idea imaginable.
Ginsberg will probably live a year or so at most and Trump can choose his own replacement.
A ‘liberal’ Justice would be a huge improvement over her.
I’d like to see three each of conservative, moderate, and liberal Justices. But that means ALL of the 4 nutcases would have to leave.
really means, Republicans actually fighting for a conservative and not rolling over.
Chris Ruddy sounds like a Liberal Democrat when he opposes the nuclear option and advocates for Merrick Garland being made a Justice. Is President Trump sure Ruddy voted for him?
Buzzi Ginsberg is nothing if not a survivor. Pancreatic/colon cancer survivor. Heart disease/surgery. Chemo. Time to step down Ruthie. Enjoy family.
The only reason HotAir is even running this tripe is because they are part of the globalist, open borders, #NeverTrump Salem Witch Media empire.
Absolutely NOT !
The GOP neither invented nor used the nuclear option first. Law of Unintended Consequences.
not a chance (but it shows how desperate the communistic leftists are getting to dream up ideas like this)
they thought they had taken America over
they did but all the SorozNazi and IslamoNazi $$$$ couldn’t buy a third national election
IIRC, she was not on President Trump's list, which disappointed me.
Remain calm. I prefaced my remark that it was crazy to begin with.
Original Bates Motel!
The term fake news has become somewhat overused. I now prefer crap news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.