Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Markey Claims Democrats Will Restore 60-Vote Threshold for Supreme Court Nominees
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | April 10, 2017 | Cameron Cawthorne

Posted on 04/10/2017 4:33:05 PM PDT by Kaslin

Markey Claims That Dems will Restore Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees

Sen. Ed Markey (D., Mass.) claimed Monday that Democrats will restore the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees once his party retakes the majority in the Senate.

"When the Democrats return to the majority and capture the presidency, which we will," Markey said, "that day is going to arrive [and] we will restore the 60-vote margin."

"We will ensure that for the Supreme Court, there is that special margin that any candidate has to reach because that is essential to ensuring that our country has a confidence in those people who are nominated," Markey added. "Rather than just someone who passes a litmus test."

MSNBC host Katy Tur asked Markey earlier in the interview whether he and Democrats had regrets about opposing President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, who was sworn in on Monday. Democrats mounted the votes to filibuster Gorsuch, a rarity for Supreme Court picks.

Markey castigated Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and Senate Republicans for invoking the so-called "nuclear option" by lowering the cloture threshold from 60 votes to a simple majority of 51. He called their move "unprecedented" and said that they "destroyed" the Supreme Court nomination process.

The Senate then confirmed Gorsuch last Friday with a 54-45 vote in favor of his nomination, and he was officially sworn in on Monday.

This tactic was used by Senate Republicans to overcome the filibuster effort by Democrats, but it was initiated by former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev) and Senate Democrats in 2013 when they controlled the chamber, the Washington Free Beacon reported:

Senate Democrats first employed the nuclear option back in 2013 to advance former President Obama's judicial nominations, although the Supreme Court was not included in the rule change. The move was used to circumvent Republican efforts to filibuster some of Obama's nominees

Three and a half years later, Democrats have threatened to filibuster the nomination of Gorsuch, President Trump's pick for the nation's highest court. The Senate's 52 Republicans threatened to use the nuclear option to break the filibuster and did so on Thursday.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; dingyharryreeid; edmarkey; neilgorsuch; presidenttrump; scotus; senate; senatedemonrats; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Kaslin

Hey Murky, you shouldn’t lie like that. I understand that when you do, your private parts fall off!


81 posted on 04/10/2017 8:09:42 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949
I think before the democrats take the Senate and the presidency, the Supreme Court will be 6-3 or 7-2 conservative...

If we can get one or two good decisions on voting integrity the SC will be ours for 10 generations.

The 2A is icing on the cake -- voting is the big deal. Without fraud, elections will go our way.

82 posted on 04/10/2017 9:08:17 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

it did, but now it’s a requirement to be a democrat


83 posted on 04/10/2017 9:15:48 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

well good- then republicans can filibuster every nominee by democrats while they ‘hold power’ and when the republicans take the power back, we can change the rules again and get through all our nominees-

Works for me Markey!


84 posted on 04/10/2017 9:17:18 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Sure they will! if they get 61 Democrat senators. Of course that is not something that will happen in the next cycle.


85 posted on 04/10/2017 9:42:28 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Markey malarkey


86 posted on 04/10/2017 10:19:09 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; sickoflibs
He called their move "unprecedented"

That's news to me, Reid did it for lower court nominees so the difference is what exactly? ****ing hypocrisy.

87 posted on 04/10/2017 10:22:14 PM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Such phony scumbags, it is hard to believe any of them.

Their Obama Care is a disgrace, when 19 million elected to pay a tax rather than be covered, it is time to say it is an abject failure.


88 posted on 04/10/2017 10:46:24 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Do you want to know what will REALLY happen if the Dems ever regain the WH and Senate?

The Filibuster will be eliminated completely - for ALL appointments AND legislation. They will lie and say the Republicans already did it, and the FakeNews media will nod their heads in agreement.


89 posted on 04/10/2017 10:50:38 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Liar, liar. Soiled pants on fire.


90 posted on 04/11/2017 12:25:56 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Heh. Every time I see a RAT complain about the Supreme Court seat being "Stolen" by Trump, I ask them if the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. seat was "stolen" by Obama since the Dems refuse to hold a vote on Bush's nominee Miguel Estrada.

I have yet to get an answer from them.

91 posted on 04/11/2017 8:11:03 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They CANT do it till they control the Senate.
They WONT do it till AFTER they guy (dem President) is about to leave office.


92 posted on 04/11/2017 1:50:07 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt; Dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson