Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Markey Claims Democrats Will Restore 60-Vote Threshold for Supreme Court Nominees
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | April 10, 2017 | Cameron Cawthorne

Posted on 04/10/2017 4:33:05 PM PDT by Kaslin

Markey Claims That Dems will Restore Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees

Sen. Ed Markey (D., Mass.) claimed Monday that Democrats will restore the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees once his party retakes the majority in the Senate.

"When the Democrats return to the majority and capture the presidency, which we will," Markey said, "that day is going to arrive [and] we will restore the 60-vote margin."

"We will ensure that for the Supreme Court, there is that special margin that any candidate has to reach because that is essential to ensuring that our country has a confidence in those people who are nominated," Markey added. "Rather than just someone who passes a litmus test."

MSNBC host Katy Tur asked Markey earlier in the interview whether he and Democrats had regrets about opposing President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, who was sworn in on Monday. Democrats mounted the votes to filibuster Gorsuch, a rarity for Supreme Court picks.

Markey castigated Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and Senate Republicans for invoking the so-called "nuclear option" by lowering the cloture threshold from 60 votes to a simple majority of 51. He called their move "unprecedented" and said that they "destroyed" the Supreme Court nomination process.

The Senate then confirmed Gorsuch last Friday with a 54-45 vote in favor of his nomination, and he was officially sworn in on Monday.

This tactic was used by Senate Republicans to overcome the filibuster effort by Democrats, but it was initiated by former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev) and Senate Democrats in 2013 when they controlled the chamber, the Washington Free Beacon reported:

Senate Democrats first employed the nuclear option back in 2013 to advance former President Obama's judicial nominations, although the Supreme Court was not included in the rule change. The move was used to circumvent Republican efforts to filibuster some of Obama's nominees

Three and a half years later, Democrats have threatened to filibuster the nomination of Gorsuch, President Trump's pick for the nation's highest court. The Senate's 52 Republicans threatened to use the nuclear option to break the filibuster and did so on Thursday.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; dingyharryreeid; edmarkey; neilgorsuch; presidenttrump; scotus; senate; senatedemonrats; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2017 4:33:06 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, they won’t.


2 posted on 04/10/2017 4:33:56 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hah hah, no they won’t! LOL


3 posted on 04/10/2017 4:34:13 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Uh, no. dems will change, republicans restored.


4 posted on 04/10/2017 4:35:50 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Bs......They got us to do the dirty work....

Keep reading the constitution. Not even sure if an actual vote was required....which we have interpreted as Majority Rules.

5 posted on 04/10/2017 4:38:57 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I say let him think that.

When his party hasn’t been in control for 40 years, it may dawn on him that wasn’t such a swift promise.


6 posted on 04/10/2017 4:39:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Ed who?


7 posted on 04/10/2017 4:40:48 PM PDT by rayincolorado ("Those who forget the past, are condemned to repeat it ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh, well. Markey. I’m fully on board with that BS, er, promise.


8 posted on 04/10/2017 4:40:50 PM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Under President Chelsea Clinton and Majority Leader Lena Dunham?


9 posted on 04/10/2017 4:41:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Markey is known as one of the least intelligent members of the Senate...and that’s going some, given the plethora of knotheads who populate the body.


10 posted on 04/10/2017 4:41:39 PM PDT by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

More Democrat lies and sheer bluster. Democrats can’t be believed or trusted with anything they say they will do unless it involves stripping rights, redistributing wealth, or increasing government.


11 posted on 04/10/2017 4:42:16 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; All
They lost. We won.

They better get used to it.

12 posted on 04/10/2017 4:42:54 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Talk is cheap.


13 posted on 04/10/2017 4:44:06 PM PDT by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yeah, and Santa will really come down my chimney.

This is such an obvious fairy tale I can’t imagine why Markey bothered to utter it.


14 posted on 04/10/2017 4:45:37 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Markey barely knows what day it is much less what the Dems will do. I’m betting they won’t change a thing. Why would they?


15 posted on 04/10/2017 4:45:55 PM PDT by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What would Harry Reid do?


16 posted on 04/10/2017 4:46:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

17 posted on 04/10/2017 4:46:18 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ed Markey is a communist scumbag.

Didn’t that used to be frowned upon in the USA?


18 posted on 04/10/2017 4:46:44 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does Makarky have some ocean front property in Arizona he’s try to sell? I wouldn’t buy it. Nor will I buy that the democrats would ever change the threshold back to 60 votes.


19 posted on 04/10/2017 4:47:30 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I think before the democrats take the Senate and the presidency, the Supreme Court will be 6-3 or 7-2 conservative...


20 posted on 04/10/2017 4:49:20 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson