Posted on 04/05/2017 8:43:16 AM PDT by C19fan
Thanks!
Again, you keep saying that PRINCE AND PRINCESS have to be on the NSC to cause problems..
Let’s check in a year or two and see if you believe the same thing.
Which level is allowed to see the secret files that are suppose to be paper only in regards to intelligence.
I wonder how many of those people got unmasked by Obama’s minions.
Scratch that now that I know the tweet is fake.
I agree ... good post!!
Ivanka & Jared are too far left for me in many areas but I think Trump will listen to them but keep his promises to America. The listening and engaging may be what allows him to keep those promises.
All good... :-)
I don't think I even comprehend that question.
I believe it was LS (could be someone else...) who said Roger Stone is not a useful source of any information.
I hope that link is accurate
If you know about the various security levels in that amount of detail I thought you would know about those files that are paper only...
Is that Steve Bannon’s Twitter account ?
That account is not verified and there are a bunch of Steve Bannon accounts
Is that Steve Bannon’s Twitter account ?
That account is not verified and there are a bunch of Steve Bannon accounts
Done with you Trump.
So let’s set the record straight for those that don’t understand this about Bossert.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2017-07064.pdf
Bossert cannot set the agenda for HSC. Read it yourself.
The guy who won’t say Radical Islam sets the agenda unless he decides AT HIS DISCRETION..that Bossert can do it.
WHY???
No, I don’t know a thing about that. In fact, I was amazed and stunned and angry that my E-QIP form and background investigation wasn’t taken offline by OPM, when China stole all of that for 21 million current and past-tense Federal employees and contractors.
Do you have a link to that? I found a Steve Bannon FB page and then some claimed it was fake.
There was a Drudge story yesterday saying Bannon thought Jarod would have him out inside 6 months.
Text of the official document from which Bloomberg bases this article.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2017-07064.pdf
Perhaps one of the members of FR can give us a more honest and accurate synopsis of the Directive.
Oh and BTW the top link seems to work just fine, but it seems the title was changed a bit at the website.
Oh..never mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.