Bannon as Mr. French?
Posted on 04/05/2017 8:43:16 AM PDT by C19fan
Rush made the same mistake a few minutes ago.
Bannon as Mr. French?
I just out that link and it’s not Bannon’s own page (if he has one), it’s a big mix of this/that and mostly negative comments. Was there something specific you were linking to?
“Looks like Ivanka and Jarred are taking over.”
My first thought too. How ironic if two of his beloved family members take him down when the NWO and all the DS couldn’t have done it.
No, no, no... ask away.....
Gorelick is a bad actor who needs to be nowhere near the White House or anyone connected with it.
Can you expand on her role with the Kushners with some links?
And perhaps some background on her for those not familiar with her agenda and leftists contacts.
Thanks.
Thanks.
WSJ is appearing to change course away from full rudder hard left. I have a sibling that has been a reporter with them for more than a decade and I’ve always worried a little about my conservative influence on my sibling because if I was to succeed in converting and raising the awareness of my sibling, there would be difficulty to stay under the radar of liberal editors and keep the job.
Reporters are not all-knowing. They’re are just good at collecting facts and summarizing them to journalistic standards so that editors can slice and dice to get a product.
In fact, reporters are often highly compartmentalized to keep an appearance of objectivity. That may seem laughable from what conservatives know about the propaganda media. But what goes in from reporters is ‘processed’ by editors and can come out completely different.
Of course, anything that makes an editor’s job easier can result in promotions for the reporter that makes it easier. As a result, reporters that are malleable to an editor’s views will float to the top and the liberal bias will be carried forward.
The propaganda product? It’s really the result of liberal editors and editorial boards.
He just back tracked that too.
Flynn’s son is an idiot. No rational person cares what he says/thinks.
Search engine is your friend.
If you don’t like google or bing..use the Search on FR.
In order to unite, we either educate them to understand the validity of our position, or, compromise, meaning we give up some of what we believe.
It is a good idea to try the former, and essential that we avoid the latter. The mis-informed stand a chance to be properly educated. I believe it is a wasted effort to try to sway their hardcore communist/socialist/fascist/tyrannical leaders.
Why are you saying that? What makes you think I am missing something?
I have said numerous times on this thread and others that the Kushners with Gorelick behind them are disturbing.
How can they cause problems with the NSC? I will tell you how. They have to make a case for member changes to the President directly. If the President listens to them and acts on what they say, then we will see. Until then, this exchange is vacuous.
You hit the nail on the head.
Listening to the Prince and Princess may be what brings him down.
No amount of spying by Obama’s minions could do it.
Could it be that we are selling McMasters short here? When I looked him up & listened to several of his speeches his point was that using that term is counterproductive to the effort to defeat ISIS in several ways. It alienates our best allies in the region which cripples our efforts. Also we miss our chance to drive a wedge by defining ISIS as a perversion of Islam. It might be a better point of view for the person who has to support alliances to allow him to accomplish his mission.
I have pretty strong views on Islam but I am willing to let the man do his job the way he thinks is most effective if he is committed to destroying ISIS.
I guess you aren’t one of those that believe there are competing factions at the WH.
I do.
Let’s say that is true....and we shouldn’t use the term Radical Islam even though Trump campaigned on using those words.
Why shouldn’t Bossert be able to set the agenda for HSC?????
I just came to the same conclusion. Will ask mods to pull it.
good
On the first point. Trump is not the military commander & its OK that he doesn’t have that kind of nuanced thinking. I think the two together are stronger than either apart. McMasters can capitalize a bit on the perception that he has a deeper understanding in work withing our allies; they will work best with the one who “gets it”, leaving Trump as the one both have to satisfy.
On the second I don’t have enough information on Bossert or how the agenda is set to have an informed comment..yet..
ERGH “working with” not work withing...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.