Felon!
These people must be investigated and prosecuted.
State Department insiders have discussed Susan Rice’s role in unmasking names ‘for weeks’ – and Obama MUST have known – says Trump NATO ambassador pick
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3540704/posts
NYT did for Cernovich what Newsweek did for Trump with Monica:
THEY MADE THEM.
And good! I hope they keep this up.
They didn’t like Matt Drudge, and NOW WE HAVE TWO OF THEM.
Basically.
Happened to catch CNN. They’re already busy trying to cover it up or minimize it.
And A B Stoddard was practically hyperventilating on Bret Baier’s show today. ‘Devin Nunes Lied, What Rice did wasn’t illegal’. It was shocking that she finally had a Dem meltdown....she is usually Left, but controlled.
I just saw a 15 minute segment on CNN that refused to mention Rice and said Trump is a criminal put in by the Russians.
They kept cutting to McCain and Graham too.
I just hope our new DOJ burns the whole tree and diggs up the roots.
“Susan, you has some splainin to do!”
Oh yeah, I doubt she was the lone wolf in all of this. When is she being arrested? That’s what I want to know.
CNN is in full spin mode. They just had somebody going on about “former (unnamed) intelligence officials, both republican and democrat...nothing unusual to unmask”. They straight up just make it all up. So let me get this straight, a bunch of people that just “happen” to be part of the Trump circle all “happen” to get ensnared in “intercepts during other investigations” and just “happen” to be unmasked for no good reason and shared across all intelligence agencies, leading to leaks about U.S. citizens...has nothing inappropriate about it? These laws are there for a reason, to protect U.S. citizens incidentally caught up in investigations.
Anyone with a brain can see this is all political. The media are TRYING HARD to push evidence aside, so much for the “hard hitting investigative journalism”. They’re just pure propagandists. They would be in full meltdown mode if this were a republican doing it to a democrat.
The President should setup a “Trump Foundation”, do exactly the same as what Hillary did, just to show their bias.
As Sundance states in the article, the unmasking in and of itself was not illegal.
But there are dozens of folks on this site, that for some reason, believe it to be illegal. I think mostly because they WANT it to be illegal.
Heck, I want it to be illegal too absent a regular Federal Court Order. Not FISA courts either.
It’s the LEAKER that committed a certain crime, and by finding and charging the leaker we have a path to determine: Illegal Conspiracy to distribute in violation of the FISA, and Political Spying in violation of the FISA.
But if we don’t find the leaker, it’s not promising.
**These people must be investigated and prosecuted. **
AND jailed.
excerpt from the article
Zero's handlers all of which are lawyers probably saw all this coming and how much jeopardy there was for Rice and who knows who else. So they just drew up an EO had val/jar auto stamp it and problem solved.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/03/susan-rice-requested-to-unmask-names-trump-transition-officials-sources-say.html
As the Obama administration left office, it also approved new rules that gave the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing intercepted personal communications and the ability to share those with 16 other intelligence agencies.