Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate panel recommends Gorsuch for Supreme Court, Democrats hope to block nomination
AP via Chicago Tribune ^ | April 3, 2017 | Mary Clare Jalonick Associated Press

Posted on 04/03/2017 1:25:34 PM PDT by Enchante

A deeply divided Senate panel favorably recommended Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch on Monday, sending the nomination to the full Senate for what is expected to be a partisan showdown — and eventual confirmation.

The 11-9 committee vote for President Donald Trump's nominee, strictly along party lines, came shortly after Democrats secured enough votes to block the nomination in the full Senate. But that Democratic success was virtually certain to be a short-lived political victory, as Republicans vowed to change Senate rules to put Gorsuch on the court and score a much-needed win for their party.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; gorsuch; gorsuchfilibuster; nuclearoption; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Jim Noble

True, but that is IF McConnell will require the ‘rats to perform a genuine filibuster. Who knows if McConnell has any balls?


21 posted on 04/03/2017 2:37:07 PM PDT by Enchante (Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Let them speechify and filibuster. It will be on C-SPAN and no one will watch Then bring the vote and laugh at them.


22 posted on 04/03/2017 2:39:01 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

That’s not sufficient. We need that 9th Justice now NOT 3 MONTHS from now. Besides, there are other things needing to be done in the Senate other than filling this position. Tax cuts, etc.


23 posted on 04/03/2017 3:14:14 PM PDT by RonnG ( v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Bingo. I like the designation “Constitutional option” mentioned in a previous post. It is more appropriate


24 posted on 04/03/2017 3:21:03 PM PDT by xxtnchl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

marker


25 posted on 04/03/2017 7:18:18 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

two ditzy clowns, Sotomayor and Kagen>>>>>>>>>

awful offal.

We need 3 righteous ones, Gorsuch is the 1st.


26 posted on 04/04/2017 12:24:18 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Somewhere I saw that Schumer wants to offer not to filibuster, in return for McConnell to promise no nuclear option for the next nominee. NO NO NO!


27 posted on 04/04/2017 5:00:38 AM PDT by Old_Grouch (69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson