Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate panel recommends Gorsuch for Supreme Court, Democrats hope to block nomination
AP via Chicago Tribune ^ | April 3, 2017 | Mary Clare Jalonick Associated Press

Posted on 04/03/2017 1:25:34 PM PDT by Enchante

A deeply divided Senate panel favorably recommended Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch on Monday, sending the nomination to the full Senate for what is expected to be a partisan showdown — and eventual confirmation.

The 11-9 committee vote for President Donald Trump's nominee, strictly along party lines, came shortly after Democrats secured enough votes to block the nomination in the full Senate. But that Democratic success was virtually certain to be a short-lived political victory, as Republicans vowed to change Senate rules to put Gorsuch on the court and score a much-needed win for their party.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; gorsuch; gorsuchfilibuster; nuclearoption; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Senate Judiciary Committee votes to send Gorsuch nomination to the full Senate!

Also approved are nominations for #2 and #3 positions in Dept. of Justice.

Now McConnell needs to force these nominations through, one way or another.

1 posted on 04/03/2017 1:25:34 PM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Since the ‘rats are saying they have enough votes to filibuster it all comes down to McConnell pushing through the “nuclear option”.... time to go nuclear on the dirty lying ‘rats!


2 posted on 04/03/2017 1:27:12 PM PDT by Enchante (Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I believe he intends to use the so-called nuclear option if the Dems filibuster the nomination, and as Reid promised he would set in motion if the Dems had won the Senate and Clinton the White House.


3 posted on 04/03/2017 1:28:14 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Democrat Obstructionism.


4 posted on 04/03/2017 1:29:37 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
"Lying to children about the world we live in to further corporate polluter profits is cruel,"

But lying to children about the world we live in to further the globalist/liberal agenda and to finance wealth redistribution is perfectly acceptable.


5 posted on 04/03/2017 1:32:01 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best long term prep for conservatives: Have big families & out-breed the illegals & muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

After what McConnell said about he WILL be confirmed, he BETTER follow through...If not, he is toast as far as conservative Americans go....


6 posted on 04/03/2017 1:35:14 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

I have also seen it called ‘the constitutional option’ which I prefer. The constitution only requires a majority vote.


7 posted on 04/03/2017 1:35:20 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
...time to go nuclear on the dirty lying ‘rats!

Republicans have both houses and the Presidency and yet the demoncraps act like the majority who put the republicans in power don't exits and republicans act as thought they are not the majority.

As I've said many times, it would be refreshing to see a boat load of high ranking demoncrap politicians and bureacrats, e.g., Rice, Holder, Clintons, Obama to name a few ..... in jail!! In any other world where the Constitution and law are enforced - they would be.

8 posted on 04/03/2017 1:38:39 PM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

McTurtle better grow a pair.
The media won’t be on GOP side no matter what. They’ll be labeled as extreme for going nuclear (using the Reid Rule) & they’re the obstructionist party for not giving Garland an up or down vote.
Call their bluff & vote!


9 posted on 04/03/2017 1:39:47 PM PDT by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

If Garland is the Holy Grail of Supreme Court justices, why the hell did Bonzo waste two nominations on those two ditzy clowns, Sotomayor and Kagen? The RATS had two opportunities to put Garland on the court. THEY blew it. Screw them.


10 posted on 04/03/2017 1:41:31 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (McCain has got to go. The boy is crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I agree, and I think these appointments generally should only be blocked - by either party - in truly extreme cases of malfeasance or suspected criminality, not just “I don’t like this guy’s views on the Constitution.”


11 posted on 04/03/2017 1:43:11 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Fantastic move by the dems, break the seal on the nuclear option now and we have essentially ended the debate on the next nomination, when Ginsburg croaks. A two-fer. I love it.


12 posted on 04/03/2017 1:43:27 PM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I get the feeling the Democrats overall are going to look rather petty and foolish to the vast majority of Americans...

That just tells you how beholden they are to their lunatic base...

It’s rather idiotic for the dems to think the GOP would consider another nominee that would placate the lunatic fringe...


13 posted on 04/03/2017 1:48:52 PM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keat
Maybe even a three fer.

Let's be real....The Dems want us to do the dirty work of changing the rules...that gives them 4245 news articles about how we are so desperate.

14 posted on 04/03/2017 1:49:31 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: keat

I’m hearing Kennedy wants to retire. I think he’s 80ish. Makes sense to me.

Trump’s list should reassure him. He’s a libertarian-like, fiscal conservative, iirc.

After his gay marriage ruling no one would mistake him for a textualist or an originalist.

I suspect he’d be satisfied if he thought Trump would nominate a republican. Didn’t Sandra Day waffle a bit until she had an idea who would replace her?


15 posted on 04/03/2017 1:52:56 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: keat

http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-constitution-does-not-require-the-senate-to-vote-on-a-nomination/article/2001087


16 posted on 04/03/2017 1:52:59 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

If the Democrats do this now it will free up easier confirmation for replacements for other justices. Let them do it...they certainly would not hesitate to do it to us - they already did after calling it “un-American”.

Now get those lower court seats fully filled with conservative jurists as well.


17 posted on 04/03/2017 2:01:54 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Since the ‘rats are saying they have enough votes to filibuster it all comes down to McConnell pushing through the “nuclear option”

No, no, NO!!!

Is everybody here new at this? Judge Gorsuch, or any judge, needs FIFTY-ONE VOTES to be confirmed.

What needs SIXTY VOTES is a motion to stop debate, which can continue until a) there are sixty votes to stop it, or, b) the anti-faction becomes exhausted and cannot hold the floor.

NO FILIBUSTER HAS EVER GONE ON FOREVER.

What's new is that, since the 1970s, the Senate (by majority consent) will accept a "declaration of a filibuster" and move on to other business, in effect tabling the business before the Senate (a nomination, in this case) and leaving it undone as long as the "declarers" remain unchanged. This grants the minority a veto which requires zero effort to excercise. This is not a tradition, it has no historical validity, and...

This is stupid and can be changed with no change in the underlying rule that a supermajority is required to end debate.

All that the majority need do is require the minority to hold the floor until they cannot. The longest filibuster in history was 57 days long, in 1957.

If the Democrats stop the business of the Senate for 57 days over this matter, it will cost them big time in 2018, and I'm sure they know it.

It is completely unnecessary to exercise the so-called "nuclear option". All the Majority Leader needs to do is to open debate on the nomination, then sit back, and wait. Move cloture every day.

18 posted on 04/03/2017 2:11:57 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

The war goes on,skirmish by skirmish,battle by battle,. It will not end until one side is totally defeated and humbled into orange jump suits.


19 posted on 04/03/2017 2:15:10 PM PDT by Don Corleone (.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

DPRK News Service@DPRK_News 4h4 hours ago
More
“Filibuster” is anti-democratic delay tactic favored by US republicans in even numbered years, and by US democrat party at all other times.

Calling a halt to senators gassing and taking a majority vote is called the “nuclear option” by our `rat news propagandists when GOP invertebrates wet themselves contemplating its use.
It is the “constitutional option” according to the same shills when Democrats use it without hesitation to get what they want, with the help of a few GOP turncoats.


20 posted on 04/03/2017 2:22:51 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson