Now we know what the conversation on the tarmac was about.................
Bill got the signature
So based on the above report, applications to the FISA Court are signed off on by the Attorney General, and therefore if any applications were processed in the past year, they were signed off by Loretta Lynch.
This means that Lynch signed-off on any requests for wire-tapping Donald Trump during the Presidential race. This is disheartening knowing that she released a video over the weekend calling for the need for more “marching, blood and death on the streets”.
This also means that she chose not to investigate the Clinton Foundation for illegal activities, but rather signed an application to wire-tap Trump.
Finally, another very disturbing fact about the wire-tapping request of Trump is that the FISA Court turned down the 0bama Administration’s first request to wire-tap Trump that was evidently signed-off by Attorney General Lynch. With only two applications denied out of 10,700 from 2009 through 2015, the fact that the 0bama Administration’s application was denied by the FISA Court is very disturbing. The odds of this happening were 0.02%.
This was a fishing expedition from the get go. Does anyone believe that Obama did not know about Lynch’s activities?
I heard Judge Napolatano say this morning that the President did NOT need anyone to sign off.
Did anyone else hear that? How can that be ?
Now you know why she "deferred" to Comey. Sure stinks!!
I think Trump was right on....Watergate 2.
if they’re done legally. if done ‘under the table’ there would not be a paper trail.
Obviously, Lynch didn’t do that without an order from Obama. That guy is working overtime for the devil.
The President can order no FISA needed, so Obama tells John Brennan to go ahead, that’s all that’s needed.
Amusing that the left wing sycophants in the MSM are quick to claim that Trump is lying, that Obama or his commissars would never illegally wiretap or violate the privacy of any American. Yet none of them have sought to question Obama directly and ask him to unequivocally deny that he wiretapped Trump.
Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests the executive power of the United States in the president. The power includes execution of federal law, alongside the responsibility of appointing federal executive, diplomatic, regulatory and judicial officers, and concluding treaties with foreign powers with the advice and consent of the Senate. Therefore the president is responsible for the actions of his cabinet of which the AG is a member nominated by the president, his position created in 1879.
We have three possibilities here: 1, Obama was aware of the tap, if it exists, and he and his people are lying about it, or, 2, Obama was not doing his job during his administration not being aware of executive actions done by his cabinet. How many others did he miss like actions by the IRS, actions not being accomplished by the State department in Benghazi or the treaty with Iran.
The only other possibility is that ABC just flat lied about everything, which they have been known to do, except Obama’s people are denying everything. Oops!
But it does bring to mind a thought: if Russia is bugging Hilary, and China is bugging us, and we are bugging the world, is the libs bugging Trump that far out of the ordinary and could be expected whether it can be proven or not? I don’t trust them any further than I can throw them.
red
And yet no one from the media has thought to ask Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder?
Odd.
“An Obama spokesperson vehemently denied the former president’s involvement”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802
So he’s throwing Lynch under the bus? He’s saying she acted without authorization, as required by the above statute?
(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order ...
(b) Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attorney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction ...
And why would they do this, if they were in fact not actually trying to ensure national security by surreptitiously monitoring the communications of foreign countries and their agents?
Who would benefit by knowing what candidate Trump was saying, believing his conversations to be confidential?
Could someone please explain to me how Obama could not have known that the opposition candidate was being wiretapped? Could he have stopped it? If he could not have stopped it, then nobody could.
Then, what difference at this point in time, does it make if he did or did not order the wiretapping?
Thank you val jarrett...traitor.
SCOTUS has called this fraud upon the court.
Trump should start wire tapping both Obama and Clinton under the same authority