To: SeekAndFind
I heard Judge Napolatano say this morning that the President did NOT need anyone to sign off.
Did anyone else hear that? How can that be ?
6 posted on
03/07/2017 2:35:49 PM PST by
Baldwin77
(They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
To: Baldwin77
10 posted on
03/07/2017 2:39:45 PM PST by
Baldwin77
(They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
To: Baldwin77
POTUS can legally bypass the FISA warrant process on national security grounds.
15 posted on
03/07/2017 2:48:52 PM PST by
Enchante
(Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
To: Baldwin77
It was posted here a washington times story on bush who ordered one without FISA in 2006
19 posted on
03/07/2017 2:52:54 PM PST by
kvanbrunt2
(all your base are belong to us)
To: Baldwin77
Yes, I heard that too. Obama could have done it all on his own according to the judge.
21 posted on
03/07/2017 2:54:43 PM PST by
tirednvirginia
( But help is on the way!)
To: Baldwin77
Hey, Loretta!
Will have a whole new meaning!!
36 posted on
03/07/2017 3:21:37 PM PST by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Baldwin77
It's true, but only if there is "no substantial likelihood that the surveillance would involve a US Person."
It's always been assumed that the President does not need any judicial warrant to order surveillance outside of the US, and in establishing the FISA courts it was clearly stated that that principle -- that there was no intent to step on the President's absolute authority beyond the water's edge -- was not being reduced.
52 posted on
03/07/2017 4:22:21 PM PST by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson