Posted on 03/04/2017 7:16:24 PM PST by Texas Fossil
The claim Russia interfered in the election was the cover story to conceal the Obama House/Deep State surveillance of the Trump campaign
Back on 10th October 2016, shortly after the US intelligence community published its first claim that Russia was trying to interfere in the US election, I wrote an article for The Duran in which I pointed out that the true story was that for the first time in its history the US intelligence community was interfering in a US election in order to swing the election behind its favoured candidate Hillary Clinton and that the practices the US intelligence community had honed to interfere in elections in other countries were now being imported to the US.
In an article for The Duran on 31st October 2016 just a week before the election I said that Hillary Clinton and her supporters had a planted a bomb under US democracy by orchestrating a campaign claiming that her opponent Donald Trump was the favoured candidate of Russia, and that the result would be that if Donald Trump were elected his legitimacy as President would be challenged.
In a further article for The Duran on 10th December 2016, in the fraught run up to the inauguration and whilst the Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign were actively lobbying electors on the Electoral College to disregard the results of the election and to vote against Donald Trump, I said that the CIA and the US intelligence community by playing up the paranoia against Russia were engaging in what amounted to a coup against the countrys constitutionally elected President. The word coup is now also being used by people like Mark Levin to describe what has been happening.
(Excerpt) Read more at theduran.com ...
Great point! All their whatever "studies" courses aren't much good when it comes to actual analysis, computer work, etc.
Report: Clapper, Carter recommended Obama fire NSA head ...
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/306894-report-clapper-carter-recommended-obama-fire-nsa-head
ComDems must lie, no one would elect them if they told the truth.
They have had lots of experience deceiving.
Slide of hand?
—
The Reality of Modern Liberalism exists within the Boundaries of Illusion, Lies, Deception and Fraud. As totally conjured as Obama’s Past.
If Trump has the thumbdrive, he should do an Assange type dump every couple of days directly to the American people.
There must be a significant unknown component missing in all this. It seems everyone was pretty sure Clinton was going to win, so why the tap, a losing Trump would have been insignificant. Unless, they were interested in finding out what Trump knew about their newly elected Hillary.
I am assuming that Donald Trump has evidence and is just reeling in the usual suspects.
I’d say a big dot was Obama closing the two properties that the Russians owned...I think one on Long Island and another in Maryland. It was a place for Russian Diplomats to reside while in the US. I believe them 72 hours to get out. It sure raised my eyebrows.
Russia is the alibi when it all comes out, i.e. “I had to bug Trump, he was collaborating with those mean Russians.” I bet the bugging started within a day of when Obama first mentioned Russia interfering with the election.
This article — and your cogent analysis — seems to make more sense than anything I’ve heard or read about the “Russia hacked our election” nonsense since the November election.
...or maybe they weren’t so sure they were going to win.
Can’t believe that the demos didn’t have some internal numbers that were showing them they might be in trouble.
Yep, Similar potent article on Conservative Treehouse too.
Occams Razor Did NSA Admiral Mike Rogers Warn Trump On November 17th, 2016?
Remember....Clapper, Brennan and Hayden ALL lied under oath to Congress regarding the surveillance program.
There may have been interest in bashing Trump after the election to finish him off forever.
Nailed it. Very good perspective.
I think the mistake you are making is in using the term "Obama and Hillary."
Ten bucks says Obama's team also had Hillary Clinton under surveillance as well. Since she was running as a war-mongering globalist who would basically mirror about 95% of what we saw with the George W. Bush administration, I'm sure they didn't trust her any more than they trusted Trump.
If anything, they'd be more likely to use the Clinton surveillance for real blackmail if she had won -- since they already had a treasure-trove of information about her links to Russia from her days as Secretary of State.
There were 2 supporting pieces linked in the article.
I did not copy the HTML only the text, it was excerpted. So the links did not show in the portion I posted.
Bring back Snowden to be the IT guy at Hussein and ValJar’s sedition compound. The Secret Service should keep a close eye on those two.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.