Posted on 12/13/2016 10:09:12 AM PST by Enlightened1
Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.
These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider. After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.
He said,
“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”
“I know who leaked them.”
“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”
CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN
The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.
Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.
Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...
The Wookie did it!
Bttt.
5.56mm
In a way I wish if it was the guy that was murdered that they would say so and let people connect the dots. Nothing is that easy though and I wouldn’t want the Dems to go after his family.
Reporters at the New York Times just put their hands over their ears, closed their eyes and are mumbling something like 'I'm not listening to you"...
Please check your smartphone - your fake news needs editing!
the source was found out by the clintoons and was arkancided in the common clintoon fashion
Or someone who has endured years of personal abuse and humiliation, and decided to take revenge. This would be easy to justify in one's mind, since such a person would be sparing the country an ordeal as well.
Is the source listed here a typo on your part or is the source some conjured website that’s not to be trusted??
Reporters at the New York Times just put their hands over their ears, closed their eyes and are mumbling something like 'I can't hear you I can't hear you.."
“They”...maybe one of the people is dead...
Seth Rich?
As it is, she has no power, and she'll soon have no Foundation, therefore no money. Useless.
Putin is not that stupid. He may or may not like her personally, but he wouldn't destroy her when he could have used her for years.
This is why I never believed the "Russian Hacker" BS
The NYT and the rest.....are soo-o-o-o irrelevant.
Burnie’s supporters have so much to be angry about. It’s been a long time since such a blatant political back stabbing has been committed. Did the RAT’s really believe that those people would meekly be suborned into their fold?
It is, was, will always be Trump’s best buddies, the Russians, until CNN deems it not to be.
The IT company that supposedly helped the CIA point the finger at the Russians said that two Russian hacker groups, “Cozy Bear” and “Fancy Bear”, were the hackers responsible. They then said the hacker groups were in tight with the Russian government.
I don’t believe a word of it.
The company “ratting out” the Russian groups has a vested interest in it (cybersecurity firm, gets paid to protect companies from hackers).
Also, saying that this or that hacker group had strong ties to the Russian government is like saying 4-Chan and Anonymous have strong ties to the American Federal government. Puh-lease.
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/
Telling the truth builds confidence and trust. Something Hillary lost early in life.
Is Assange alive? Is there a video of this Murray saying this recently? If he knows who did it, why won’t he tell someone? Once he is dead, who will know?
I personally think it was an inside leaker, but all these stories about what Assange may have said at some time, when no one seems to have a clue where Assange is or if he’s alive, sound pretty iffy.
Too bad the clintoon insider committed arkancide or we could ask him.
The list of people in the Democratic Party who have grudges against Hillary must be a long one, but those who supported Bernie and saw what was done to him by his own party would have the clearest motive to leak those emails.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.