Posted on 12/13/2016 10:09:12 AM PST by Enlightened1
Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.
These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider. After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.
He said,
“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”
“I know who leaked them.”
“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”
CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN
The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.
Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.
Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...
If a tree falls in the forest, and the NYT does not cover it, then the Russians did it!
Maybe Bill just really really really did not want to go down in the History books as the 1st Husband.
We haven’t heard from him in a while. Does anyone know why?
I don’t think it will be considered proof unless the leaker (source) comes forward or there is hard evidence in writing or on video/audio tape. Up until then the libs can just blow it off.
Remember all those tablets and Blackberries HRC lost, according to the FBI?
She’s surrounded by staff, secret service, and sycophants 24/7. How on earth would she misplace a tablet?
She wouldn’t...her staff probably took them.
yea and where the hell is assange now?
could this whole thing be a false flag to smoke out the real leaker?
My theory is that it was Obama himself who saw to it that Hillary did not get elected via allowing or even ordering the inside leaks. He hates her and Bill. If not, Bill.
Well maybe, just maybe, there really is an honest defector from the Clinton Mafia... Someone who loves their country, honest dealings, truth and God...
Or, perhaps it was just a jilted Hillary lover... or someone who was further to the ideological left and who ended up favoring Sanders...
Regardless ... an insider leak was the most plausible source all along... Just doesn’t fit the latest Clintonista narrative.
The “The Russians did it!” bunch is really hanging their hat on guccifer 2.0...they point to this one hacker as “the Russians” ignoring the fact that guccifer 2.0 did not provide the vast majority of the released emails
Wikileaks, Anonymous, and several other hackers provided material
guccifer 2.0 was only a small part yet that’s the only one that they can pointing to as possibly being “the Russians”
So heads up
The thing is they may find there was some Russian involvement via guccifer 2.0 ..but he was a very small part
So they will amplified guccifer 2.0 into being THE ONE HACKER... which he(or she) was not......
Wikileaks was the main leader of this and Wikileaks state flatly it came from an inside source
Maybe as much proof as the claim that the Russians did it?
This is not someone who is close to Hillary. This is someone who is close to Podesta. Its his email they got. Her emails came from the government. But Podesta’s password was gotten from someone who had the email last summer and maybe earlier. I think that the CIA is saying its the Russians to smoke out who it really is. They don’t believe its the Russians. But if its in the FBI or if its in the government or DNC then Obama and the Dems want to know and the want to know while they still have the reins of power.
Trump may not need to know. And he may not do anything if he finds out.
LOL, yep, and probably more believable. I wish we could get some concrete proof. Maybe something will turn up.
As much as I want the Assange assertion to be believed, I’m failing to see how anyone is all of a sudden going to say “Oh... Julian says that Russia is not involved. OK, that’s solves it all folks!”
Professor Plumb, in the library, with the candlestick.
[Is Julian Assange dead?]
That question should be a post of its own. No one seems to know.
Good point. Podestas emails were the most damaging imo. Funny too how the Democrats claim that Hillarys server wasn’t compromised and then make this claim. They must think that we won’t notice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.