Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Julian Assange Confirms Hillary’s Worst Nightmare: DNC Leaks Inside Job Not Russians
World Prsss ^ | 12/12/16 | J.B.

Posted on 12/13/2016 10:09:12 AM PST by Enlightened1

Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.

These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider. After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.

He said,

“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”

“I know who leaked them.”

“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”

CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN

The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.

Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.

Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: 2016electionhack; 2016trumprussiahack; assange; dncleaks; hillary2016; insidejob; not; russians; trumprussia; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: ml/nj

If a tree falls in the forest, and the NYT does not cover it, then the Russians did it!


21 posted on 12/13/2016 10:24:40 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Maybe Bill just really really really did not want to go down in the History books as the 1st Husband.


22 posted on 12/13/2016 10:24:50 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Trump discriminates against non-successful people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

We haven’t heard from him in a while. Does anyone know why?


23 posted on 12/13/2016 10:26:40 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

I don’t think it will be considered proof unless the leaker (source) comes forward or there is hard evidence in writing or on video/audio tape. Up until then the libs can just blow it off.


24 posted on 12/13/2016 10:30:17 AM PST by Tennessee Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Remember all those tablets and Blackberries HRC lost, according to the FBI?

She’s surrounded by staff, secret service, and sycophants 24/7. How on earth would she misplace a tablet?

She wouldn’t...her staff probably took them.


25 posted on 12/13/2016 10:30:37 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

yea and where the hell is assange now?


26 posted on 12/13/2016 10:31:39 AM PST by ldish (Have had enough...you??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

could this whole thing be a false flag to smoke out the real leaker?


27 posted on 12/13/2016 10:33:09 AM PST by Revelation 911 (clean up is a breeze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

My theory is that it was Obama himself who saw to it that Hillary did not get elected via allowing or even ordering the inside leaks. He hates her and Bill. If not, Bill.


28 posted on 12/13/2016 10:33:33 AM PST by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Yeah, Huma is who I'm thinking of as well.
29 posted on 12/13/2016 10:41:10 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (Those that can, do, those that can't, work in the Beltway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Well maybe, just maybe, there really is an honest defector from the Clinton Mafia... Someone who loves their country, honest dealings, truth and God...

Or, perhaps it was just a jilted Hillary lover... or someone who was further to the ideological left and who ended up favoring Sanders...

Regardless ... an insider leak was the most plausible source all along... Just doesn’t fit the latest Clintonista narrative.


30 posted on 12/13/2016 10:41:41 AM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The “The Russians did it!” bunch is really hanging their hat on guccifer 2.0...they point to this one hacker as “the Russians” ignoring the fact that guccifer 2.0 did not provide the vast majority of the released emails

Wikileaks, Anonymous, and several other hackers provided material

guccifer 2.0 was only a small part yet that’s the only one that they can pointing to as possibly being “the Russians”

So heads up
The thing is they may find there was some Russian involvement via guccifer 2.0 ..but he was a very small part

So they will amplified guccifer 2.0 into being THE ONE HACKER... which he(or she) was not......

Wikileaks was the main leader of this and Wikileaks state flatly it came from an inside source


31 posted on 12/13/2016 10:44:37 AM PST by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshua c
DC police are right on top of this investigation..... as in covering it up and going nowhere...
32 posted on 12/13/2016 10:45:52 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Conservative

Maybe as much proof as the claim that the Russians did it?


33 posted on 12/13/2016 10:50:56 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

This is not someone who is close to Hillary. This is someone who is close to Podesta. Its his email they got. Her emails came from the government. But Podesta’s password was gotten from someone who had the email last summer and maybe earlier. I think that the CIA is saying its the Russians to smoke out who it really is. They don’t believe its the Russians. But if its in the FBI or if its in the government or DNC then Obama and the Dems want to know and the want to know while they still have the reins of power.

Trump may not need to know. And he may not do anything if he finds out.


34 posted on 12/13/2016 10:51:20 AM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

LOL, yep, and probably more believable. I wish we could get some concrete proof. Maybe something will turn up.


35 posted on 12/13/2016 11:04:57 AM PST by Tennessee Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Why not Weiner himself?
36 posted on 12/13/2016 11:06:20 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

As much as I want the Assange assertion to be believed, I’m failing to see how anyone is all of a sudden going to say “Oh... Julian says that Russia is not involved. OK, that’s solves it all folks!”


37 posted on 12/13/2016 11:08:25 AM PST by Enduro Guy (Trump/Pence 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Professor Plumb, in the library, with the candlestick.


38 posted on 12/13/2016 11:10:09 AM PST by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

[Is Julian Assange dead?]

That question should be a post of its own. No one seems to know.


39 posted on 12/13/2016 11:12:07 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Good point. Podestas emails were the most damaging imo. Funny too how the Democrats claim that Hillarys server wasn’t compromised and then make this claim. They must think that we won’t notice.


40 posted on 12/13/2016 11:13:16 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson