Posted on 12/13/2016 8:07:51 AM PST by bobsunshine
Green Party candidate Jill Steins Michigan recount unintentionally exposed major voter fraud in Detroit.
Election officials in Michigan found that 37% of precincts in Detroit tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books.
Hillary Clinton won Wayne County over Donald Trump 67% to 30%.
State officials are planning to examine about 20 Detroit precincts where ballot discrepancies occurred. Detroit News reported:
Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last months presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the citys 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnsons office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Wouldn't the grandest irony be if the jillstein recount caused the demonRAT voter fraud to be truly brought into the spotlight.
Hoisted on his own petard.
No, Boris and Natasha did it.
I didn’t consider that and was a bit confused by the judge’s decision. But that certainly makes sense.
Remember the big brouhaha before the election where the Libs went to court to stop Republican poll watchers from being allowed into certain inner city precinct, because they might intimidate voters. This is why. There are no Republican poll watchers in inner city Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, Los Angeles due to a courts ruling in the 80’s.
To some degree we have to blame ourselves. I opted not to work at in inner city precinct, since it meant driving both ways in the dark.
No, the dimmanazis were counting.....
Green Party candidate Jill Steins Michigan recount unintentionally exposed major voter fraud in Detroit.
Election officials in Michigan found that 37% of precincts in Detroit tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books.
State officials are planning to examine about 20 Detroit precincts where ballot discrepancies occurred. Detroit News reported:
Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last months presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.
I suspect that Michigan would have went to the GOP in the last several Presidential elections if it wasn’t for voter fraud. Since the voter fraud is primarily out of Detroit, the DNC forgot that the population of Detroit has went down substantially; therefore the voter fraud there was less effective.
I saw someone interviewed from a resstaurant in a PA county with many Amish. He said that they had 120 people driving people to the polls. Their vote (they usually do not even vote) may have turned the tide in PA.
If it’s like Sante Fe, they just run the same ballot through the counter over and over.
lol, If I killed someone, Kenda is the last guy I want to be in a room with. Guy is about as cold as Spock.
Hell, up here in Ohio Obama got 148% and 110% of the registered electors support (if you can figure that out . . . maybe with Common Core math).
That Vladimir Putin is one wily snake.
Based on these “Detroit, Michigan” fraud findings, the Democrat scum & vermin headed by Obama & Clinton actually lost the states of Virginia, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Nevada, New Mexico. New York & California should be removed from being included in the POTUS voting count, because millions of illegal votes were cast by illegals in both those states numbering in the millions!!! Keep in mind both NY & CA, were both masssive “Outlier” states, rigged by Obama & Clinton!!!
First Detroit....Second California...
Hillary knew about the fraud, and that’s why she joined in supporting the recounts.
IOW, she had to support the recounts, or the fingers would have been pointed at her for being part of the plot to steal the election. It’s kinda like a disclaimer or a redirect on her part, where she would be seen as supporting the recounts to uncover voter fraud, while she herself and the DNC were in cahoots with the scheme. It’s like a criminal who shows up to the burial, in the hopes of turning all suspicions away from him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.