To: Vince Ferrer
Oh I can hardly wait until the enviro-whacko’s hear about this. If they thought fracking was bad - this is gonna be fun
2 posted on
12/07/2016 6:48:13 PM PST by
Fai Mao
(PIAPS for Prison 2016)
To: Vince Ferrer
Of course the watermelons (green on the outside,red on the inside) already have come up with a reason why we must *NOT* use this method and have already recruited the professional protesters when the time comes.
To: Vince Ferrer
Thanks for posting this. Sounds promising.
To: Vince Ferrer
“They’re gonna zap all the earthworms!!!”
5 posted on
12/07/2016 6:55:05 PM PST by
lgjhn23
(It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
To: Vince Ferrer
“Come and listen to my story bout a man named Jed.
A poor mountaineer barely kept his family fed.
And then one day he was microwaving popcorn
And up from the ground came a bubbling crude.”
Just doesn’t work.
9 posted on
12/07/2016 6:58:19 PM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Vince Ferrer
Giant microwave??? I’ll get the popcorn.
11 posted on
12/07/2016 6:59:46 PM PST by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: Vince Ferrer
Dammit. How are we ever going to become a society of hunter-gatherers who have to rely on sunlight and wind for power if people keep inventing new ways to produce cheap oil?
13 posted on
12/07/2016 7:16:54 PM PST by
Bubba_Leroy
(Ding Dong the Witch is Dead!)
To: Vince Ferrer
Will it nuke animals underground too?
Whatis the energy cost to power this? Sounds like 500 kwatts but what does this add onto the pumping costs?
14 posted on
12/07/2016 7:17:23 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Vince Ferrer
Don’t know how much oil they’ll get, but I can see an endless supply of bad SyFy movies.
15 posted on
12/07/2016 7:20:51 PM PST by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: Vince Ferrer
Sounds promising.
I am sure Trump will let them go and explore this method to determine whether it is indeed as good as it sounds, and if it is, then let them use it in the industry.
16 posted on
12/07/2016 7:28:39 PM PST by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: Vince Ferrer
If it contributes to collapsing the Saudi economy, I’m all for it.
23 posted on
12/07/2016 8:37:55 PM PST by
Salvavida
(The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
To: Vince Ferrer
Have cooked bacon in microwave. Can confirm this technology is effective for extracting oil.
To: Vince Ferrer
If they can make this work on a truly large scale, this means many supposedly "tapped out" oilfields may come back to life again. And the whole concept of
peak oil is rendered much less likely again.
Indeed, once Venezuela gets rid of the Maduro government, imagine applying this technology to extract the very heavy crude oil found in that country--they could become one of the richest countries in South America within one generation!
25 posted on
12/07/2016 9:18:22 PM PST by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: Vince Ferrer
26 posted on
12/07/2016 9:28:26 PM PST by
NotQuiteCricket
(DidnÂ’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.)
To: Vince Ferrer
27 posted on
12/07/2016 9:29:49 PM PST by
gogeo
(That's my Trumpy!)
To: Vince Ferrer
Microwaving for oil will become dangerous and objectionable in 3.. 2.. 1..
To: Vince Ferrer
Bp and ConocoPhillips also are sitting on a formation called West Sac on the north slope of alaska. This field contains more oil than prudhoe bay. It is closer to the surface so it is too cold to flow. They have tried for years to get this oil to the surface. The permafrost runs from the surface to around 1900 feet below the surface. It would be great if they were able to utilize this technology.
To: John Robinson; Vince Ferrer
35 posted on
12/08/2016 5:32:06 PM PST by
houeto
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson