Posted on 11/30/2016 4:13:01 PM PST by jazusamo
In a Senate floor speech today, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham announced that they are offering an amendment to strip a key element of the recently passed Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act (JASTA) that clarifies U.S. law for civil claims against foreign governments for funding terrorism.
JASTA was passed in the Senate in May with no objections, and passed the House of Representatives unanimously in September. President Obama promptly vetoed the bill. The Senate and House successfully voted to override the veto and the bill became law.
McCain and Graham specifically said they want to strip the "discretionary state function" provision from JASTA that creates liability for foreign governments funding terrorist groups.
According to Hill sources familiar with the McCain/Graham amendment, their intention is to immunize countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar that have funded Sunni terrorist groups in Syria -- the Syrian "rebel" effort that both McCain and Graham have publicly supported since 2011.
The McCain/Graham amendment was slammed by 9/11 family groups that fought for JASTA.
The 9/11 Families and Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism put out the following press release this afternoon:
In a speech on the Senate floor this afternoon Senator Graham pitched this new language as a simple caveat but in reality he is proposing to amend JASTA to add a specific jurisdictional defense Saudi Arabia has been relying on for the last 13 years to avoid having to face the 9/11 families evidence on the merits.Moreover, Senator Graham and Senator McCain mischaracterized JASTA in several material respects during their speeches today. For example, Senator Graham argued that JASTA is deficient because it does not require that a foreign state have knowingly supported terrorism in order for liability to attach, but in fact JASTAs liability provision expressly requires that the foreign state have knowingly provided substantial assistance to a designated terrorist organization in order for liability to arise. Senator Graham also suggested that adding a discretionary function provision to JASTA would protect the US from claims for drone strikes in Pakistan, which is simply incorrect given that Pakistan has made clear its view that domestic and international law prohibit those strikes.
Notably, Grahams and McCains efforts come in the wake of a massive lobbying campaign by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which is now employing roughly a dozen Washington lobbying firms at a cost of more than $1.3 million per month.
"In April of this year, Senator Graham met with 9/11 family members from the September 11 Advocates Group and told them that he supported our cause 100%, said Terry Strada, National Chair for the 9/11 Families and Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism.
Senator Graham is now stabbing the 9/11 families in the back. He and Senator McCain are seeking to torpedo JASTA by imposing changes demanded by Saudi Arabia's lobbyists. We have reviewed the language, and it is an absolute betrayal.
The 9/11 Families are fortunate to have Senators John Cornyn and Chuck Schumer to block this action in the Senate, and we take comfort that President-elect Donald Trump strongly supports our cause. The President-elect has made his support for JASTA crystal-clear, and there is zero risk that he will support this kind of backroom backstabbing of the 9/11 families, Strada concluded.
In their statements today, Senator Graham said with respect to their intentions:
We're trying to work with Senator Schumer and Senator Cornyn, who deserve a lot of credit for trying to help the 9/11 families. Here's what we're asking. We're asking that we put a caveat to the law we just passed saying that you can bring a lawsuit, but if you're suing based on a discretionary function of a government to form an alliance with somebody or to make a military decision or a political decision, the only time that government is liable is if they knowingly engage with a terrorist organization directly or indirectly, including financing. I am okay with that because our country is not going to fall in league with terrorists and finance them to hurt other people. If we don't make this change, here's what I fear: That other countries will pass laws like this, and they will say that the United States is liable for engaging in drone attacks or other activity in the war on terror and haul us into court as a nation and haul the people that we give the responsibility to defend the nation into foreign courts.
McCain added:
The changes that Senator Graham and I are proposing, I think, are modest. And I think that logically, that you should not pursue or prosecute a government that did not knowingly -- the word isn't abetted or orchestrated, but knowingly -- knowingly stand by and assist a terrorist group that they shouldn't be dragged into our courts. If we don't fix it, our ability to defend ourselves would be undermined. And I just want to emphasize one more point that the senator from South Carolina made. We have had drone strikes in many places in the world, in many countries in the world. Pakistan is another example. And all of us have supported the efforts, and many of them successful, in destroying those leaders who were responsible for the deaths of American servicemen and women. And it is a weapon in the war against terror. But sometimes, as in war, mistakes are made and innocent civilians were killed along with those terrorists. Does that mean that the United States of America, the government, is now liable? I'm afraid that some in the tort profession would view this as an opening to bring suits against the United States of America.
It appears their intention is to pass the amendments to JASTA during the lame-duck session before they lose key allies, such as Senator Kelly Ayotte, who lost her reelection bid in New Hampshire.
can a senator be prosecuted for treason ?
My Lord, CANT WE REPLACE MCCAIN AND LINSAY>>>>?!?!?!?!??!!?
THESE TWO ARE JUST AWFUL EMBARRASSMENTS, AND McCain at least seems all too inclined to provoke all the wrong wars for us, too
McCain and Lindsay are the leading examples of why so many American voters (at least outside their local communities) despite anything and anyone carrying the GOP brand
Come on Arizona!?! Why do you keep electing this treasonous creep. How many decades of backstabbing do you need to witness?
Exactly...I can’t see the knowingly thing, in any suit it would have to be proved anyway.
Graham and McCain should both be in jail for arming and financing terrorism. So these two homicidal maniacs want the US to retain the ability to drone anyone, anytime, any where on the planet. Bunch of BS. Here is reality. The US Oligarchs want to continue to flood the US with illegal immigrants so that they can win elections with voter fraud. And they know there are terrorists within these incoming illegals. Now to keep the scam going, they have to prevent US citizens from having the ability to civilally sue governments that allow their terrorist citizens to emigrate to the US. This allows foriegn governments to turn a blind eye to their terrorist citizens attacking US citizens.
Wow if,these rino gopers went after,obamacare like they are, this....
I really hope they fn-g die horribly.
McCain and Graham both need to be presecuted for war crimes and treason.
When McCain croaks I will have to stay off FR. I will have nothing good to say about him..
Follow the money. Follow the Money. Hillary isn’t the only crooked one in DC.
How do those two lover boys keep getting elected. I would not be surprised if they jumped ship to the Democratic side.
Many, many reasons.
McCain Graham, lowlifes.
I sure hope Trump’s new education secretary slows down on UNESCO workforce training long enough to keep foreign terrorist agents out of our public schools. Qatar Foundation is hitting it outta the park in the US.
good
the bill legalizes a kangaroo court
Of course they did
McCain had years ago JD Hayworth running against him, and still the voters voted for this McCain idiot.
punch bowl ... I like that
Drain the Punch Bowl.
(Or maybe just Flush it.)
These two Bozo’s need to be put out to pasture!
Wouldn't want to create a liability to countries who fund terrorist, would we?
I Heartily agree with you. ORGANIZE & FIGHT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.