Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'We don't need the FCC': A Trump advisor's proposal to dissolve America's telecom watchdog
LA Times ^ | 11/24/16 | Brian Fung

Posted on 11/24/2016 2:46:48 AM PST by markomalley

A top advisor to Donald Trump on tech policy matters proposed all but abolishing the nation's telecom regulator last month, foreshadowing possible moves by the president-elect to sharply reduce the Federal Communications Commission's role as a consumer protection watchdog.

In an Oct. 21 blog post, Mark Jamison, who on Monday was named one of two members of Trump's tech policy transition team, laid out his ideal vision for the government's role in telecommunications, concluding there is little need for the agency to exist.

"Most of the original motivations for having an FCC have gone away," Jamison wrote. "Telecommunications network providers and [Internet service providers] are rarely, if ever, monopolies."

The FCC declined to comment for this story, but its current leadership has disagreed strongly with that analysis. Its Democratic chairman, Tom Wheeler, has spoken of an Internet service "duopoly" in much of the country that limits competition. And he has compared telecommunications to the rail and telegraph networks of the 19th century, calling for new rules of the road as the Internet becomes the dominant communications platform of the 21st century.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: fcc; fedcommunications; telecom; telecommunications; trump; trumpcabinet; trumptransition; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last
To: Gaffer

Soon, the entire world will be fiber end-to-end. Any RF usage will be minimal. We’re almost there now.

The history of communications show that sooner or later, whatever regulatory agency is involved will try and regulate speech/content. Such is the nature of man and government

Pope Leo X tried to stop publication of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses.

“Copyright” was originally an attempt to regulate who could own and operate a printing press.

What do you think this latest push regarding “fake news” is?

Free Speech has ALWAYS had to fight to remain free.


101 posted on 11/24/2016 6:50:18 AM PST by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

>> that would be interesting in regards to amateur radio <<

Yes. If this policy should be carried to its logical conclusion, hams would end up having to pay for their frequencies. Bad for hams, but probably good for everybody else.


102 posted on 11/24/2016 6:50:23 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

If you read back through my comments they deal mainly with the functions for which I think the FCC or similar function are necessary. I’ve also stated here that the politics of its function has to be removed.

When you say “I’m wrong,” at least get the facts straight.


103 posted on 11/24/2016 6:51:12 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I disagree OM. Hams have been self-regulating for decades and its only after the current lawyer-dominated FCC took over that things went downhill. We DO need the Enforcement Division! But staffed with guys like Riley, not some bimbo fresh out of law school looking to get her ticket punched and on to the next gummint job. We darn near lost the HF bands due to BPL, which was politically pushed by FCC. The same dolts who forced “HD radio”onto the market with just one crony outfit controlling the technology, and on and on.

CB? You know, with bigger fish to fry I’d open it up as a “free radio” band and let ‘er rip, let ‘em play music, broadcast, work skip, whatever. Then enforce the hell out of part 97 on the ham bands. If the miscreants would congregate there instead of 75 meters it would do everyone a big favor, and could be entertaining now that there’s not much to listen to on shortwave.


104 posted on 11/24/2016 6:53:11 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: abb
Soon, the entire world will be fiber end-to-end. Any RF usage will be minimal. We’re almost there now.

You tell me when they run a fiber directly into your home. And will you have a mega reel of fiber connected to your cell phone and that cell tower, You don't know what you're talking about.

105 posted on 11/24/2016 6:53:24 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Try reading this first before you say that the FCC doesn't need abolishing

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Ok so you support unelected government democrat(communists) censoring the Internet. I’m saying the FCC must be abolished because I know the FCC will try to censor the Internet as the article below proves. . But I hope Trump becomes aware of this

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Abolish the FCC and investigate these bureaucratic tyrants

106 posted on 11/24/2016 6:54:51 AM PST by Democrat_media (President Trump has to change the 1965 immigration act so he can get a 2nd term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: abb

Totally wrong. Fiber will be the backbone but millions of new endpoint will all be wireless. Don’t doubt me.


107 posted on 11/24/2016 6:56:39 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The FCC should only be involved in RF communications, the disruption of which can be dangerous. Cable and Internet do not “broadcast” in the traditional sense of the word, and should no more come under the control of the FCC than a newspaper.


108 posted on 11/24/2016 6:58:35 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Big bank of florescent grow lights?


109 posted on 11/24/2016 6:59:04 AM PST by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

No. You go back to your statement that the RF spectrum will end up being disused - that’s just foolish. You’re wandering off to crap that I’ve got no problem in abolishing and avoiding that.

You still don’t know what you’re talking about.

Further, you apparently still can’t read. I’ve said repeatedly that stuff you’re throwing up to me (basically, censorship and politics) are what I’ve said all along here that need to be removed. Keep the parts that are necessary and get rid of the rest.


110 posted on 11/24/2016 6:59:27 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

As a matter of fact, there is fiber on the pole right outside my house, connected to my modem via 75 ohm coax. Delivering 100 MBPS all day, every day.

Cell phones are a different animal, and do use RF.

And yes, I do know what I’m talking about regarding the history of governments attempting to control the free flow of thought and information.


111 posted on 11/24/2016 6:59:41 AM PST by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: abb

And prove to me that this “link” is all fiber all the way. You can’t. And you still don’t know what you are talking about.


112 posted on 11/24/2016 7:01:33 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What frequency does The FCC broadcast on?


113 posted on 11/24/2016 7:01:49 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Try reading this first before you say that the FCC doesn’t need abolishing

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Ok so you support unelected government democrat(communists) censoring the Internet. I’m saying the FCC must be abolished because I know the FCC will try to censor the Internet as the article below proves. . But I hope Trump becomes aware of this

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Abolish the FCC and investigate these bureaucratic tyrants


114 posted on 11/24/2016 7:03:48 AM PST by Democrat_media (President Trump has to change the 1965 immigration act so he can get a 2nd term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Add spectrum management to that list and this would be good. No “fair doctrine” PC crap. However this is not where I would have begun with govt reductions. There are many agencies that I would put higher on the cut list. Pretty much anything that does not play a role in national security.


115 posted on 11/24/2016 7:06:37 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS; markomalley

>> Markets sort this kind of thing out quickly <<

Markets won’t work well in the absence of well-defined and enforceable property rights. But it’s virtually impossible to imagine how property rights could be assigned and enforced for amateur radio. I doubt that even the late Ronald Coase could have come up with a viable solution.

Therefore, I submit that a 100% market-based approach to allocation of the RF spectrum would probably doom amateur radio to the dustbin of history. That may be a good thing, or it may be a bad thing. We report, you decide.


116 posted on 11/24/2016 7:08:28 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

You’re just repeating pathetic posts that don’t address my comments on this thread. I started with the RF spectrum and Congress’ law to address it in the CA of 1934 and all of a sudden, the RF spectrum will be disused and we have to the worry about the frigging internet. Yes, I agree, the government’s manipulation of the internet is not necessary and should be severely crippled if not abolished.

But that still does not negate the legitimate need for some RF deconfliction and control. You and devolve down to crap diversions but the fact remains you’ve (and others) said some things that are just patently foolish.


117 posted on 11/24/2016 7:09:22 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Whatever. But the FCC is still gonna have its guts ripped out, and it is LONG overdue. Their ruling that the internet is a utility opens the door to censorship.

Back in 1907, “Universal Service” was what allowed government control of phone service.

Government, power, and how they work has never changed since the dawn of mankind. And they never will.


118 posted on 11/24/2016 7:09:24 AM PST by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Try reading this first before you say that the FCC doesn't need abolishing

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Government agencies are all becoming politicized and weaponize against the American people, against freedom and against America the IRS, FCC, EPA, NASA , none were doing the stupid unconstitutional original reasons they were supposedly set up for. Billions of dollars annually are taken at the point of a gun to give billions yearly in budgets to these tyrannical agencies to further opress us . Is that America, is that in the Constitution? .

Where in the Constitution is any of these monstrosities authorized? Go ahead name it. Maybe you should move to Venezuela, that's were your tolerance for these government agencies as in the FCC censoring the Internet, IRS oppressing conservatives and so on leads to. Read this and the Constitution and get a clue.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Abolish the FCC and investigate these bureaucratic tyrants

119 posted on 11/24/2016 7:10:26 AM PST by Democrat_media (President Trump has to change the 1965 immigration act so he can get a 2nd term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

“I realize it’s a funding & enforcement issue -— but for eight years?!”

Tell them you hear white supremacist dog whistles encoded in the noise and it keeps you from hearing the LGBT rights broadcast. They’ll be out there tomorrow.


120 posted on 11/24/2016 7:10:53 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson