Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

True Electoral Count for Trump? They stopped counting after 270 (vanity)

Posted on 11/09/2016 7:17:27 AM PST by Scythian_Reborn

I am sorry for the vanity but I think this is important and worthy of it's own thread. The media totally stopped counting electoral votes after Trump surpassed 270.

I believe he is truly sitting at 306 right now which is an absolute blowout. Does anybody have the real electoral count? This is important I believe as Trump didn't barely win, he won "Bigly" and I think it should be reported as such. Since win did they ever stop counting? Never that's win, until Trump.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: electoralcollege
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: kevslisababy

If you loose the popular vote, whether fairly or fouly, it become harder to argue for a mandate.


21 posted on 11/09/2016 7:29:48 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

I still can’t. What is it?


22 posted on 11/09/2016 7:30:17 AM PST by GeorgiaDawg32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

Hillary was +2.5m in CA/DC. Trump only lost the popular vote in one big state and D.C. He won decisively across the other 49.


23 posted on 11/09/2016 7:32:10 AM PST by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

IL NY and CA are tone deaf, and completely out to lunch in the cesspool.
.

The big rat controlled cities in those states control the outcome in elections.

Chicago, NYC, LA, The Bay area and Sacramento for California.


24 posted on 11/09/2016 7:32:12 AM PST by Grampa Dave (President Trump sounds so good after 8 years of the Obozo! Adios global elites on both sides!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn
What the media counts isn't official as you know.

The process:

November 8, 2016—Election Day

Registered voters cast their votes for President and Vice President. By doing so, they also help choose the electors who will represent their state in the Electoral College.

Mid-November through December 19, 2016

After the presidential election, the governor of your state prepares seven Certificates of Ascertainment. “As soon as practicable,” after the election results in your state are certified, the governor sends one of the Certificates of Ascertainment to the Archivist.

Certificates of Ascertainment should be sent to the Archivist no later than the meeting of the electors in December. However, federal law sets no penalty for missing the deadline.

The remaining six Certificates of Ascertainment are held for use at the meeting of the Electors in December.

December 13, 2016

States must make final decisions in any controversies over the appointment of their electors at least six days before the meeting of the Electors. This is so their electoral votes will be presumed valid when presented to Congress.

Decisions by states’ courts are conclusive, if decided under laws enacted before Election Day.

December 19, 2016

The Electors meet in their state and vote for President and Vice President on separate ballots. The electors record their votes on six “Certificates of Vote,” which are paired with the six remaining Certificates of Ascertainment.

The electors sign, seal, and certify six sets of electoral votes. A set of electoral votes consists of one Certificate of Ascertainment and one Certificate of Vote. These are distributed immediately as follows:

December 28, 2016

Electoral votes (the Certificates of Vote) must be received by the President of the Senate and the Archivist no later than nine days after the meeting of the electors. States face no legal penalty for failure to comply.

If votes are lost or delayed, the Archivist may take extraordinary measures to retrieve duplicate originals.

On or Before January 3, 2017

The Archivist and/or representatives from the Office of the Federal Register meet with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House in late December or early January. This is, in part, a ceremonial occasion. Informal meetings may take place earlier.

January 6, 2017

The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes. Congress may pass a law to change this date.


25 posted on 11/09/2016 7:32:44 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

I noticed. They just wilted.

Those cornflakes on the Left are a real work of art.


26 posted on 11/09/2016 7:33:16 AM PST by DoughtyOne (The morning and the evening were the election day. People voted. The Lord saw, and it was good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

“...it become harder to argue for a mandate.”

The Constitution does not require a mandate; only enough electoral votes. Popular vote is not the main concept in determining the outcome; the electoral college is.

However, do you really believe that Trump will abandon his platform and rely on consulting the ones who tried to destroy him? Why should the vanquished party be co-equal to the victorious party?

A “mandate” is always the cry of the losing party.


27 posted on 11/09/2016 7:35:49 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Factor in cheating and his victory is more impressive.

That, and the fact that the MSM and the GOPe/uni-party have been beating up on him 24/7 since the moment he entered the race.

28 posted on 11/09/2016 7:36:01 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

Looks that way.

NYT map shows NH, MN light blue and undecided.

MI and AZ light red and undecided.


29 posted on 11/09/2016 7:40:27 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

I agree with your analysis—”mandate” is nebulous. At the same time, it is a way of asking cooperation from the winners in the opposition who hold office in the legislative branch.


30 posted on 11/09/2016 7:50:09 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

It is really something when millions of illegal aliens voting along with a hundreds of thousands of manufactured absentee ballots in strategic locations cannot flip an election. The Democrats believed their own polls and didn’t realize that they needed to cheat more to win.


31 posted on 11/09/2016 7:50:09 AM PST by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

I think New Hampshire is lost both on the Presedential and Senate level, at least without a recount—three of the last four precincts have come in, and the Dems have increasd their narrow lead. The one remaining precinct is in a blue county.


32 posted on 11/09/2016 7:54:59 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

It has not yet been finalized...


33 posted on 11/09/2016 7:55:26 AM PST by heterosupremacist (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

last i saw they hadn’t called maine 2 either.


34 posted on 11/09/2016 7:56:18 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy

271 is a mandate for a real MAN and a true American!


35 posted on 11/09/2016 7:58:14 AM PST by Billyv (Freedom isn't Free! Get off the sidelines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

To quote an infamous sitting president- “I won, you lost, get over it!”


36 posted on 11/09/2016 8:02:21 AM PST by Billyv (Freedom isn't Free! Get off the sidelines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

We will be at 306 in the Electoral College vote.

There are significant precincts that had not reported in NH, AZ and Michigan. With practiced efforts to minimize any accomplishments by Trump the media is not showing the certain wins that Trump has in MI and AZ which will give him 306.


37 posted on 11/09/2016 8:05:55 AM PST by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

“Re-election will be 340 plus.”

Yeah, tell us, just which old worn out POS will the RATs dust off in four years?


38 posted on 11/09/2016 8:07:02 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

I might add that I predicted the EV to within 1%.


39 posted on 11/09/2016 8:07:03 AM PST by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Salazar. Racial politics.


40 posted on 11/09/2016 8:08:44 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson