Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court refuses to issue order on voter intimidation [Aimed at Ohio Trump Supporters]
PBS.Org ^ | Nov. 7, 2016 | ANN SANNER

Posted on 11/07/2016 12:45:45 PM PST by Hadean

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The U.S. Supreme Court turned down a request Monday from Ohio Democrats to issue an order aimed at preventing Donald Trump’s supporters from harassing or intimidating voters on Election Day.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that Ohio law already forbids voter intimidation.

The case is part of a flurry of courtroom efforts by the Democrats around the country to head off what they say is vigilantism by the Trump campaign and its backers.

The Republican presidential candidate has called on supporters to stand guard at the polls against fraud. That has stirred fears of minority voters being confronted and challenged by self-appointed poll watchers.

Last week, a federal judge in Cleveland issued a temporary restraining order warning that anyone, regardless of political affiliation, who engages in intimidation near or inside polling places will face contempt of court charges.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: rbg; ruthbuzziginsburg; supremecourt; voterintimidation

1 posted on 11/07/2016 12:45:45 PM PST by Hadean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hadean

monitoring polls is not intimidation. Standing outside of polling stations wearing black uniforms with berets carrying batons is though...


2 posted on 11/07/2016 12:47:07 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Oh no! Those poor democrats, they are going have to be intimidated by an elderly women with a clipboard looking at them disapprovingly as they try to cast 10 votes for Hillary!


3 posted on 11/07/2016 12:47:09 PM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

(Click The Pic)

4 posted on 11/07/2016 12:51:06 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg upholding the Constitution? She is getting senile - in a good way!
5 posted on 11/07/2016 12:53:59 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Naturally. Anything short of handing out participation trophies just for voting would lead to YEARS of therapy that isn’t covered under Obamacare....


6 posted on 11/07/2016 12:54:04 PM PST by Hadean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Even RBG didn’t buy their Projection BS!.............................


7 posted on 11/07/2016 12:54:31 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Standing outside of polling stations wearing black uniforms with berets carrying batons is though...

Now you're just being racist. Don't you know that's the ceremonial garb of their ancestors?

8 posted on 11/07/2016 1:04:43 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

maybe it was a tribute to her good friend Scalia. I don’t know how they became such great friends but life is strange


9 posted on 11/07/2016 1:07:54 PM PST by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

if my ancestors were Roman what do I get to wear? besides a toga LOL


10 posted on 11/07/2016 1:09:32 PM PST by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

That’s going to leave a mark.


11 posted on 11/07/2016 1:11:07 PM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

I will be standing around in my red shirt .... maybe with my GLOCK cap on.... wonder how “they” will react to a glock cap; supporting Trump or threat.... maybe I could get frisked or get my truck searched... Their paranoia can be tasted.


12 posted on 11/07/2016 1:13:27 PM PST by DOC44 (Have gun will travel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Standing outside of polling stations wearing black uniforms with berets carrying batons is though...

Not according to the Department of Just-us!
13 posted on 11/07/2016 1:14:02 PM PST by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

How about to PREVENT DEMOCRATS FROM COMMITING FRAUD by allowing Trump “observers” - not “intimidators”


14 posted on 11/07/2016 1:15:22 PM PST by Mr. K (Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
The U.S. Supreme Court turned down a request Monday from Ohio Democrats to issue an order aimed at preventing Donald Trump’s supporters from harassing or intimidating voters on Election Day.

Nothing bias or misleading from that first line, huh? The way this reads is that Trump supporters ARE going to be harassing or intimidating voters on election day, and the Supreme Court is going to allow this to occur.

I'm sure that this was just an accidental sentence structure error, right?!?
15 posted on 11/07/2016 1:18:42 PM PST by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOC44
I will be standing around in my red shirt .... maybe with my GLOCK cap on.... wonder how “they” will react to a glock cap; supporting Trump or threat.... maybe I could get frisked or get my truck searched... Their paranoia can be tasted.

No need to push your luck and end up in jail because Obozo has dispatched some thug minority DHS brownshirts who hate white men "just because" for any reason if you're just watching to catch the cheating. That should drive the cheaters into a frenzy alone. The cheaters can't stand it that someone stands in their way of cheating the system. The fact that they can't win without cheating says what losers they really are. There's no intimidation just "integrity checks" and monitoring to stop the cheating. Why should they have ANY proble with stopping cheating if they are really all about fairness and equality, right?...LOL

16 posted on 11/07/2016 1:23:17 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Who wants to bet that the Black Panthers will be out again ‘monitoring’ polls with their nightsticked uniforms?

And, if you’re a Panther, all you have to do is not show up in court and the case will be dismissed - so tell people you’re self-identifying as a Panther if they ask why you’re there /s


17 posted on 11/07/2016 1:58:03 PM PST by blueplum ((March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson