This is one of the (probably the biggest) reasons that I think polls have been so inaccurate this year!
The polls start out with an expected distribution of party id for the turnout, and then they weight the poll to match. This will obfuscate any significant change in party identification.
Just imagine if the poll in MN CD-8 started with a predetermine proportion of D/R/I and forced it. The poll would be drastically different! That is what has happened to the majority of polls this year.
This poll of CD-8 did not need to weight by party id, because it was a relatively small area, and they could use other demographics to insure they had a proper sample distribution. This is also why I think the Remington Research polls are much more accurate than other polls. The also did not weight on party id, but in order to not weight on party id, they needed to have large enough samples from each of the regions of the State, to insure a proper distribution - like this poll has done. That is why if you look at the Remington Research polls, their sample sizes are so much larger - they needed to be large enough to get adequate sample distributions for different area's of the State.
This poll shows that yes, it may be a Trump landslide - at least in the Rust Belt, but that's good enough for me!
1 posted on
10/26/2016 2:19:31 PM PDT by
MMaschin
To: MMaschin
BERNERS..!!
Thank you!
And thank YOU, Hillary, for berning them...!
SCREAM OF ANGER FROM BASEMENT..?
2 posted on
10/26/2016 2:21:33 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: MMaschin
4 posted on
10/26/2016 2:29:46 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: MMaschin
It’s hard to keep a party together that “represents” both BLM and workers. Especially when workers are told to sit down and shut up.
And that’s just one of the many conflicts Democrats have to deal with.
To: MMaschin
That district covers about 25% of the entire state of Minnesota. It's mostly rural, with the exception of the Duluth area. It's probably seen a lot of loss of industry in Duluth and International Falls, and I know they had that debacle within the last year or so where a foreign mining company backed out of a major deal to reopen some of the iron mines up in the Mesabi and Vermillion hills.
This has been a Democratic district for most of the time since World War II. Jim Oberstar represented it for a million years until he lost in the 2010 midterms, and it had a Republican for one term before it went back to the Democratic side. I can easily see the Republican challenger winning this race in a wave of blue-collar support for Donald Trump.
6 posted on
10/26/2016 2:37:37 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: MMaschin
Ohio......Pennsylvania......Michigan......Illinois...... Wisconsin......Iowa YES.........YES..................MAYBE............NO.........MAYBE.........YES
If we get those three yeses we can call Trump Mr. President
8 posted on
10/26/2016 2:44:04 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(She calls me Mr. Deplorable.)
To: MMaschin
Yeah, the "Red Eighth" and not named that for being Republican..
Been politically "red" for over half a century. You go Comrades of the eighth!!
9 posted on
10/26/2016 2:44:05 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: MMaschin
I have to agree with you analysis. I think most of the polls are using 2012 as there base for weighing the data. IMHO you cannot do that for 2016 as I believe there are a lot of cross over votes that will go for Trump.
To: MMaschin
Minnesota in play?...............
11 posted on
10/26/2016 2:46:02 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(WhereÂ’s that VIDEO the Anonymous group promised us????????????)
To: MMaschin
For whatever it's worth, 5 of the 20 players on the roster of the 1980 U.S. Olympic "Miracle on Ice" hockey team were from the area now covered by the 8th Congressional district.
I have no idea why I even felt the need to post that. LOL.
12 posted on
10/26/2016 2:48:47 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: MMaschin; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; ExTexasRedhead; stephenjohnbanker; ...
This is looking really good. The problem from a statewide perspective is those high-income Twin City suburbs are not producing good numbers for Trump. The same situation exists in the high-income Philly suburbs of Pennsylvania.
14 posted on
10/26/2016 3:00:29 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(The barbarians are inside because there are no gates)
To: MMaschin
Just to be clear, Minnesota 8th is NORTHEASTERN Minnesota, which includes Duluth and the traditional mining area called the Iron Range. It has been home to corrupt unions and European-descended socialists for several generations. America’s most famous Communist leader, Gus Hall, was born and raised there.
It may be that it is simply changing to a more traditional Midwestern rural (GOP) area as the mining and manufacturing have been exported, and communist centers have moved to universities and the coasts.
16 posted on
10/26/2016 3:05:23 PM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: MMaschin
I’ve been trying to tell folks, the rust belt thing is bigger than than just Trump. This is a major realignment that has been long overdue!!! Of working class, and white working class in particular. They should have moved R long ago, but idiotic adherence to “free trade” kept it from starting...
Trump is a catalyst, he abandoned this nonsense and provided the R don’t blow it, the rust belt could be as reliably red as the south within a few cycles....
MN is a bit of an odd beast, I don’t know if it could ever go solid red, but the rest sans MN and IL certainly can, and should if R’s aren’t too stupid and squander it.
To: MMaschin
20 posted on
10/26/2016 3:15:13 PM PDT by
Atlantan
To: MMaschin
In every election since Kennedy, I’ve predicted a win for the republican (except Romney)
I’m officially out of the predicting business now.
My track record ain’t eggzackly stellar.
23 posted on
10/26/2016 3:23:06 PM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
To: MMaschin
This could be a blow-out for Trump!
To: MMaschin
I have been thinking that MN might be the one under the radar. For these reasons:
1) Obamacare rates almost doubling
2) pissed off Sanders voters
3) small black population
4) aging industrial base
To: MMaschin
To: MMaschin
It's bad when anyone touts fantasy this year. We need a Brexit affect, and a total Brexit differentiation I.e. 13% to 14% difference between the polls and reality. It will help if it's nationwide.
If that happened in Minnesota, it might make the race a toss up. Anyone called Republican in a statewide election in Minnesota needs at least, 60% of the real vote to, JUST MAYBE, overcome the voter fraud.
There are many thousands of ballots already completed and boxed up in the trunks of Democrat election judges' cars, especially in the northern "Arrowhead" part of the state. These ballots can be "found" the next day, if necessary, to insure a clinton victory. These ballots will be 100% Democrat, and in court, no Minnesota judge will find that unusual. They will say people who vote have a right to have those votes counted.
There are many other ways to corrupt the outcome due to our motor voter laws that make Republican chances in a statewide race pretty unlikely. Chalk up 10 electoral votes for the female zombie.
32 posted on
10/26/2016 3:58:11 PM PDT by
stevem
To: MMaschin; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican
The eighth Congressional District of Minnesota is a working class area in Eastern Minnesota. It has voted for a Democrat in the last four Presidential elections.Way more than 4, DJ? Last Republican to win it? Ike?
45 posted on
10/26/2016 6:03:36 PM PDT by
Impy
(Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson