Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is one of the (probably the biggest) reasons that I think polls have been so inaccurate this year!

The polls start out with an expected distribution of party id for the turnout, and then they weight the poll to match. This will obfuscate any significant change in party identification.

Just imagine if the poll in MN CD-8 started with a predetermine proportion of D/R/I and forced it. The poll would be drastically different! That is what has happened to the majority of polls this year.

This poll of CD-8 did not need to weight by party id, because it was a relatively small area, and they could use other demographics to insure they had a proper sample distribution. This is also why I think the Remington Research polls are much more accurate than other polls. The also did not weight on party id, but in order to not weight on party id, they needed to have large enough samples from each of the regions of the State, to insure a proper distribution - like this poll has done. That is why if you look at the Remington Research polls, their sample sizes are so much larger - they needed to be large enough to get adequate sample distributions for different area's of the State.

This poll shows that yes, it may be a Trump landslide - at least in the Rust Belt, but that's good enough for me!
1 posted on 10/26/2016 2:19:31 PM PDT by MMaschin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MMaschin

BERNERS..!!

Thank you!

And thank YOU, Hillary, for berning them...!

SCREAM OF ANGER FROM BASEMENT..?


2 posted on 10/26/2016 2:21:33 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

4 posted on 10/26/2016 2:29:46 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

It’s hard to keep a party together that “represents” both BLM and workers. Especially when workers are told to sit down and shut up.

And that’s just one of the many conflicts Democrats have to deal with.


5 posted on 10/26/2016 2:31:14 PM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin
That district covers about 25% of the entire state of Minnesota. It's mostly rural, with the exception of the Duluth area. It's probably seen a lot of loss of industry in Duluth and International Falls, and I know they had that debacle within the last year or so where a foreign mining company backed out of a major deal to reopen some of the iron mines up in the Mesabi and Vermillion hills.

This has been a Democratic district for most of the time since World War II. Jim Oberstar represented it for a million years until he lost in the 2010 midterms, and it had a Republican for one term before it went back to the Democratic side. I can easily see the Republican challenger winning this race in a wave of blue-collar support for Donald Trump.

6 posted on 10/26/2016 2:37:37 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin
Ohio......Pennsylvania......Michigan......Illinois...... Wisconsin......Iowa

YES.........YES..................MAYBE............NO.........MAYBE.........YES

If we get those three yeses we can call Trump Mr. President

8 posted on 10/26/2016 2:44:04 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (She calls me Mr. Deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin
Yeah, the "Red Eighth" and not named that for being Republican..

Been politically "red" for over half a century. You go Comrades of the eighth!!

9 posted on 10/26/2016 2:44:05 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

I have to agree with you analysis. I think most of the polls are using 2012 as there base for weighing the data. IMHO you cannot do that for 2016 as I believe there are a lot of cross over votes that will go for Trump.


10 posted on 10/26/2016 2:45:33 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

Minnesota in play?...............


11 posted on 10/26/2016 2:46:02 PM PDT by Red Badger (WhereÂ’s that VIDEO the Anonymous group promised us????????????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin
For whatever it's worth, 5 of the 20 players on the roster of the 1980 U.S. Olympic "Miracle on Ice" hockey team were from the area now covered by the 8th Congressional district.

I have no idea why I even felt the need to post that. LOL.

12 posted on 10/26/2016 2:48:47 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; ExTexasRedhead; stephenjohnbanker; ...

This is looking really good. The problem from a statewide perspective is those high-income Twin City suburbs are not producing good numbers for Trump. The same situation exists in the high-income Philly suburbs of Pennsylvania.


14 posted on 10/26/2016 3:00:29 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The barbarians are inside because there are no gates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

Just to be clear, Minnesota 8th is NORTHEASTERN Minnesota, which includes Duluth and the traditional mining area called the Iron Range. It has been home to corrupt unions and European-descended socialists for several generations. America’s most famous Communist leader, Gus Hall, was born and raised there.

It may be that it is simply changing to a more traditional Midwestern rural (GOP) area as the mining and manufacturing have been exported, and communist centers have moved to universities and the coasts.


16 posted on 10/26/2016 3:05:23 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

I’ve been trying to tell folks, the rust belt thing is bigger than than just Trump. This is a major realignment that has been long overdue!!! Of working class, and white working class in particular. They should have moved R long ago, but idiotic adherence to “free trade” kept it from starting...

Trump is a catalyst, he abandoned this nonsense and provided the R don’t blow it, the rust belt could be as reliably red as the south within a few cycles....

MN is a bit of an odd beast, I don’t know if it could ever go solid red, but the rest sans MN and IL certainly can, and should if R’s aren’t too stupid and squander it.


19 posted on 10/26/2016 3:13:15 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

Very competitive 8th District House race.

http://kstp.com/politics/stewart-mills-rick-nolan-8th-congressional-race-kstp-survey-usa-poll/4299301/


20 posted on 10/26/2016 3:15:13 PM PDT by Atlantan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

In every election since Kennedy, I’ve predicted a win for the republican (except Romney)

I’m officially out of the predicting business now.

My track record ain’t eggzackly stellar.


23 posted on 10/26/2016 3:23:06 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

This could be a blow-out for Trump!


28 posted on 10/26/2016 3:43:01 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

I have been thinking that MN might be the one under the radar. For these reasons:
1) Obamacare rates almost doubling
2) pissed off Sander’s voters
3) small black population
4) aging industrial base


29 posted on 10/26/2016 3:47:32 PM PDT by wfu_deacons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

Who did this poll?


31 posted on 10/26/2016 3:55:20 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin
It's bad when anyone touts fantasy this year. We need a Brexit affect, and a total Brexit differentiation I.e. 13% to 14% difference between the polls and reality. It will help if it's nationwide.

If that happened in Minnesota, it might make the race a toss up. Anyone called Republican in a statewide election in Minnesota needs at least, 60% of the real vote to, JUST MAYBE, overcome the voter fraud.

There are many thousands of ballots already completed and boxed up in the trunks of Democrat election judges' cars, especially in the northern "Arrowhead" part of the state. These ballots can be "found" the next day, if necessary, to insure a clinton victory. These ballots will be 100% Democrat, and in court, no Minnesota judge will find that unusual. They will say people who vote have a right to have those votes counted.

There are many other ways to corrupt the outcome due to our motor voter laws that make Republican chances in a statewide race pretty unlikely. Chalk up 10 electoral votes for the female zombie.

32 posted on 10/26/2016 3:58:11 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican
The eighth Congressional District of Minnesota is a working class area in Eastern Minnesota. It has voted for a Democrat in the last four Presidential elections.

Way more than 4, DJ? Last Republican to win it? Ike?

45 posted on 10/26/2016 6:03:36 PM PDT by Impy (Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson