We have turncoats that never wake up.
We have hand wringers that never show up.
On November 8th, I'm going to put up!
Go Trump!
Are we supposed to cry, gnash our teeth, and say “woe is me” over this article?
Maybe there’s a strategy in posting these things but i’ll be damned if i know what it is.
Hillary destroyed women’s lives and there’s so much to report from wikileaks that this just takes up space.
I disagree with the author’s contention that any other Republican nominee could have beaten her easily.
I know she is a deeply flawed and disliked candidate, but the Clinton + Media coalition is powerful as we can see and would have taken practically anyone down, especially the GOPe favorite, Jeb.
Bush Favorite President? Lordy lord lord...
Listen to the tape, not the Ministry of Propaganda spin on it.
It’s nothing.
How is something said in 1998 a deliberate ‘blunder of 2016’.
This is concern ninny pearl clutching
We have to hope Trump also makes people to think twice about her. If not for him, stay home or vote 3rd. If people get disgusted and say I can’t vote for either one of them, it could impact the race.
We have turncoats that never wake up.
We have hand wringers that never show up.
On November 8th, I'm going to put up!
Go Trump!
All that stuff the author alludes to from Trump’s TV career: who was watching that stuff, anyway??? It wasn’t me. Was it women???
The biggest blunder was Ryan becoming Speaker. A disaster.
Comments remind me why I unbookmarked American Thinker. Losers, haters and undisciplined though processes. Article is a hodgepodge of misinformation, opinion masquerading as fact and trolling.
If I could have advised Trump, I would have dug up 15 quotes from Hillary and Bill for Trump to memorize. They would have been quotes from her (exact quotes) when she was defending her husband from inappropriate behavior (or any behavior). I would have had Trump memorize them and be able to recall every one of them from memory. Then, after the initial apology and acknowledgement, I would have advise that he use the quote that most closely and generally provides a response. Even if the context is skewed or awkward. But never let on that he is actually quoting Hillary or Bill. Let the media dig and figure it out for themselves. They love to “discover” things and announce how smart they are. They would start reporting what Hillary once said about sexually aggressive behavior.
After a few days, just to drive home the point, he would have to work in, “What difference does it make, at this point, anyway?” Then drop the mic and walk off.
Judging by the divorce rate, they don't pick husbands very well either.
If “women” want to vote for this Demon then what is there to do about.
These articles are useless. Actually, less than useless.
Thanks for posting.
DAMN THE WOMYN!!! FULL SPEED AHEAD!!!!
I recently attended a week-long quilting retreat. 100 women, and all senior citizens. I heard worse there than what Trump said.
If not for the media putting this as prime news, it would be a non-story. They just need to deflect anything that might come up about Hillary. Shameful.
Oh, and BTW, the biggest blunder in history was giving women the vote.
And I’m one! ;-)
This isn’t like any other election.
The damned CLINTONS are BOTH a joke when it comes to abuse
of women. “Horndog and Hillie” says it all.
Walking over rough gravel, barefoot if I have to, in order
to vote TRUMP! As for the turncoat GOPe; THEY HAVE BEEN
WEIGHED IN THE BALANCES AND FOUND WANTING!!
HAS-LAM in Tennessee could have just as easily KEPT HIS
PIEHOLE SHUT!!! Fang & I will NEVER VOTE FOR HAS-LAM the
HAS-BEEN AGAIN!!! NEVER!!!!!
I believe the author is absolutely wrong on two counts in this article:
1. Despite his strong negative ratings among women as far back as last spring, I remember that polls were consistently showing Trump performing better than any other Republican contenders against Hillary Clinton (and Bernie Sanders polling better than Clinton against Trump, for that matter). I mean, does the author really think Carly Fiorina would even be attracting the support of 30% of the voters if she had been the GOP nominee?
2. The track record of a male Republican candidate, and information that comes out about that candidate's past, have become increasingly irrelevant in an election because the Democratic campaigns will fabricate "woman" issues against any GOP contender anyway. This is where an in-your-face candidate like Donald Trump may have a better chance of winning than a simpering p#ssy like Mitt Romney.
The author's own numbers seem to bear this out, or at least point to a flaw in his argument. Mitt Romney did slightly better among female voters in 2012 than George W. Bush did in 2000. Bush won, and Romney lost.
More than anything else, this article tells me that Republican candidates simply have to get more men to vote in these elections. My question for the author is: Which Republican candidate in 2016 was most likely to attract more men?