Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Second Ammendment Good news development!

U.S. District Court judge Overturns several firearms restrictions affecting the Northern Mariana Island US Territory.

If these restrictions has been allowed to stand, it may have served to undermine future 2A rights on mainland USA.

1 posted on 10/11/2016 12:09:01 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MarchonDC09122009

Well there’s at least one judge that can read.


2 posted on 10/11/2016 12:14:03 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Ping !


3 posted on 10/11/2016 12:14:39 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt ("Everything HRC touches she kind of screws up with hubris.”- Colin Powell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

T R U M P - E F F E C T

I know that sounds silly, but we haven’t been winning much of anything during the last eight years. Now we’re starting to seem some small victories.

Excellent.


4 posted on 10/11/2016 12:19:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (28 days: Until Presdient Pre-elect becomes President Elect Donald J. Trump. Help is on the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

These kind of laws are exactly what Democrats means when they talk about “reasonable restrictions”.


5 posted on 10/11/2016 12:21:21 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

...If these restrictions has been allowed to stand, it may have served to undermine future 2A rights on mainland USA...

This was a lone Federal Judge. This undoubtedly will be expedited to the 9th Circuit Appeals Court where it will most likely decide that Constitutional “Intermediate” scrutiny was incorrectly applied, and find a “Rational Basis,” whatever bizarre one they come up with, should be applied and uphold the harsh laws. After all, it’s the 9th Circuit.


6 posted on 10/11/2016 12:27:42 PM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

We have something called the Mariana island?

How are they relate to the US?


7 posted on 10/11/2016 12:27:55 PM PDT by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Move her to the top of the Supreme Court list for President Trump !


12 posted on 10/11/2016 12:35:37 PM PDT by 11th_VA (No Quarter for 'NeverTrumpers')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

The Supreme Court will take care of this “travesty” when Hillary makes her first appointment


13 posted on 10/11/2016 12:36:23 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (I'm deplorable #NeverRepublican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

14 posted on 10/11/2016 12:37:15 PM PDT by 11th_VA (No Quarter for 'NeverTrumpers')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009
If these restrictions has been allowed to stand, it may have served to undermine future 2A rights on mainland USA.

Like in California?

17 posted on 10/11/2016 12:45:14 PM PDT by umgud (ban all infidelaphobics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009
If these restrictions has been allowed to stand, it may have served to undermine future 2A rights on mainland USA.

But in the sparsely populated Marianas it will be much simpler to use the second amendment solution to remove the oppressors who would violate it. Here on the mainland you can imagine how many RAT politicians, appointees and bureaucrat functionaries would have to be removed before they could flee into hiding.

19 posted on 10/11/2016 12:48:16 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

a judge who takes their oath of office seriously


21 posted on 10/11/2016 12:55:25 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009
…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (2ndA)
…there is no constitutional right to carry a concealed weapon in public.” (9th Circuit)

Those two statements are clearly inconsistent.

Although the open carrying of guns may clash with contemporary sensibilities, it is the mode of publicly bearing arms that is most clearly protected by the Second Amendment. (this decision.)

Concealed carry by definition would clash with even fewer sensibilities and under this reasoning ought to raise even less of an issue and fully satisfy the 2ndA.

Thank you for the post, 09. The decision will no doubt rattle gun-grabbers.

24 posted on 10/11/2016 1:12:19 PM PDT by frog in a pot (When will come the time to question if a "religion" with totalitarian ambitions is a 1stA religion?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009
As the Supreme Court noted in Heller, "the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues."

"State analogues."

Dear God, it's right there in plain sight.

25 posted on 10/11/2016 1:24:19 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

“...shall not be infringed” actually means something.


29 posted on 10/11/2016 2:58:50 PM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009
"Manglona notes the perseverance of the plaintiff in this case, a former U.S. Army Ranger named Paul Murphy who represented himself through years of litigation."

"Rangers Lead the Way!

30 posted on 10/11/2016 3:08:30 PM PDT by Flag_This (Liberals are locusts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

“If these restrictions has been allowed to stand, it may have served to undermine future 2A rights on mainland USA.”

That’s nice that this judge “allowed” us to exercise our natural law, God-given rights to bear arms. However, another judge could goosestep along and take away our rights to bear arms.

It’s way past time to tell judges, legislators and bureaucrats that we will exercise and USE the 2nd amendment as we see fit, and God help you if you get in the way.


32 posted on 10/11/2016 6:28:34 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Trump will give us 80% of what we want, while hillary will take 100% of what we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Won’t this be appealed to the whole Ninth Circuit? And be overturned.


33 posted on 10/11/2016 9:12:02 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarchonDC09122009
YEAH! I completely missed that one!

Thanks for posting. My good 2nd A. friend failed to aprise me of this newest ruling.

Moving toward closer to a free and just society!

This news comes at just the right time, lest we wind up "electing" the first of many dictators on our road to the dust bin of history.

38 posted on 10/12/2016 10:29:47 PM PDT by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson