Hurricane Donald Moving Toward US On Schedule!
Question for the writer: How many paychecks have you signed on the “front”?
Hillary breaks multiple laws and endangers national security — and it’s no big deal.
Trump follows the law and it’s the biggest scandal of the 21st century.
$900 million lose during a Clinton Presidency
email;s, server, perjury, Benghazi, lying, deleting evidence, foundation, and this is what they bring up!!!
God grief all week it has been the Clinton talking points,. Miss Universe, and taxes.
WHO GIVES A F-IN CRAP?
She has nothing to run on at all, and the media cover for her like this!
So sick of the scumbag media.
Taking risks with large amounts of money at what makes our economy work.
NOL (net operating loss) is a key function of large businesses. It serves to match the match the revenues and the expenditures that take place over a number of years . And yes the risks and rewards also.
Flashback: The Clintons donated used underwear to charity, wrote it off on taxes
The Conservative Review ^ | May 4, 2015
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3475858/posts
Unlike what the Hillary Clinton liberals say, there is no benefit in losing a large amount of money, and then being able to offset that loss against future income. In reality the situation is no different than someone who doesn't have to pay taxes since they never received the income in the first place.
NEW DRUDGE HEADLINE: NYT PAID NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX IN 2014.
Trump may not have paid any federal (or state) taxes
MAY NOT
But no one KNOWS, do they?
So stop already.
Anyone who has done anything significant will experience failure. A smart person will turn failure to his advantage. Trump most likely cost averaged out his loss over the next few years to offset his loss against future income. It’s legal. I have done it myself. Now let’s see an audit of the Clinton Foundation.
Denninger This rebukes the article nicely:
That is not an abuse of the tax code. What is an abuse of the tax code is to “donate” money to a “charity” (your own family foundation), radically reducing your income (and thus tax liability) that you control and which then turns around and spends nearly none of the donated funds on actual charitable services; rather, nearly all of those funds are used to pay salaries and travel (effectively living expenses and high-on-the-hog living expenses at that!) for your family members and their friends. That is legal but it’s slimy as hell and that is what the Clintons have in fact done since leaving the White House.
The NY Times is a hack outfit — not only did they run a story predicated on a criminal act they are trying to spin something that is not only lawful but every person who either runs a small business or invests does as a matter of course and is perfectly ethical, legal and in fact already occurs under mandated-by-law disadvantage that accrues to someone who has this happen, including Trump, in the tax code!
Well done article.
It’s a good tax law... I believe it has affected the tax payments of investors in the NYTimes LOL!
He lays it out so that even a basement dweller could understand. But they won’t. It’s amazing that in this country, which was founded in part because of revolution against onerous taxes, now has half the population thinking that paying more and more taxes is what it’s all about.
The next debate is this Tuesday moderated by Elaine Quijano of CBS, so I think it goes without saying she is a lib as well?
Yep, I just looked up her bio. She formerly worked for the Clinton News Network and she is of Filipino descent and grew up in the Obama lair of Chicago, so no doubt she will portray herself as an immigrant and portray Trump as racist against “her people”. Why did Trump agree to this? This is not an impartial debate setting, what the F is wrong with him? If he doesn’t take control of this debate he is finished.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elaine_Quijano
Oh here we go...She’s an advocate for illegals. Just wonderful, un-freakin-real.......
Hurricane Donald Moving Toward US On Schedule!
Is this really in the New york Times? Are they that desperate for real news? This is a legal loss carry forward . Where is the beef?
Anyone with a brain knows two things. Tax Loss carry forward” is done ecery day and we don’t pay taxes because of altruism. We pay taxes because they will put us in jail if we don’t. This is such a non story it defies the imagination.
Here is a story for the New Your Times that has criminal consequences. Hillary repeatedly and intentionally exposed TOP SECRETS of the the United State to unclassified servers. She literally ,after receiving Congressional Subpoena destroyed government documents ( 30,000 emails) with acid!! and lied about it. She lied about Benghazi— just flat out lied— why? She viciously attacked raped and sexually abuse women her husband had attacked!! The NYT sa somehow missed these REALLY important stories the people and voters need to know BUT The NYT wants to talk about a 31 year old Business “LOSS CARRY FORWARD”? They must be desperate. very desperate. Do they think we are stupid? They should be very embarrassed, GO TRUMP!! WE are winning and the NYT just helped us with this nonsense!!This is a LMAO story.
I don’t know why Trump doesn’t mention that he does pay millions in payroll, property, sales & use, franchise, license, excise, etc. in taxes. The LSM is just concentrating on income taxes.
Hillary’s husband pardoned a tax cheat Marc Rich.
tax Avoidance is legal, tax EVASION is ILLEGAL, something the Slimes should keep in mind as they avoid their own taxesTrump may have spewed out the greatest chum we’ve seen in a LONG time. Can’t wait to see where this leads.
Hopefully we’ll be treated to a steady stream of information to be released about high ranking Democrats, media hacks and “rich and famous” liberals who have not paid federal income tax in years, even decades.
This could be one of the most delicious moments of this whole campaign.
