Posted on 09/07/2016 11:25:37 PM PDT by Zakeet
Hillary Clinton was sporting a mini earbud wired to receive stealth communications from her campaign handlers during Wednesday's Presidential Forum carried live on NBC, True Pundit has learned.
While Clinton was fielding questions from NBC's Matt Lauer and the public Wednesday night on live television, a quiet buzz started circulating in New York law enforcement circles about Hillary’s left ear. NYPD sources confirm Clinton was wearing an 'inductive earpiece,' the same technology employed by almost all lead Broadway actors to receive forgotten lines and stealth off-stage cues from directors. The flesh-colored earbud is easily concealed. There are no wires running directly to the ear like you see with the units employed by Secret Service protection detail personnel.
The skin-tone piece Clinton was wearing, however, was somewhat different from the standard issued stealth earpiece and is much different in appearance from a hearing aid. This unit is considered a "micro" earbud which contains all the technology but is a fraction of the size with a very high price tag. In fact, most of the units this size, approximately 3mm or comparable to a small pearl stud earring, are normally issued to law enforcement or corporate security teams, sources said. At a size that small, the earbud is designed to sit inside the opening of the ear canal, almost invisible to anyone. However, the unit does move and shift along with its wearer and at times can slightly pop out of the canal and require a quick readjustment, experts said.
Ironically, the revelation that Clinton was wearing such a unit might have only been recognized because of astute NYPD officers attached to her security detail who are accustomed to seeing the stealth apparatus at stage shows, conventions and security personnel of VIPs and international dignitaries at the United nations and elsewhere in the five boroughs. Likewise, NYPD detectives employ a parallel technology to communicate during undercover Ops.
Based on experts familiar with the technology, the stealth earpiece operates on a bandwidth from 300 Hz to 4KHz. Many such units are powered by SONY. The range of the unit can be unlimited depending on how the back end is set up. Technically, you could receive cues from 100 feet away or from someone sitting in Washington D.C. while you sat in New York City, experts said. The set up and range is flexible based on need and use. The unit does not require Bluetooth to operate via short distances but long range operations would require Bluetooth, which is easily configured.
Story is Developing. We Will update it more as we receive additional details.
Certain Drugs can make you deaf, Oxycontin for one, Aspirin for another...............
Bandwidth and operating frequency aren’t the same. The bandwidth is the frequency range that the carrier signal will vary when modulated. 300 Hz to 4 kHz is the typical range of the human voice.
...if she is hearing voices... doesn't that mean she is mentally ill and diagnosable as clinically a schizophrenic???
EXCELLENT observation and commentary. Worse than that; Hillary claimed conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt. Trump can even bear down on that piece of idiosyncratic bizarro-world persona of The Hag:
Trump: "Hillary claimed to have spoken to and been given advice by the long-deceased Eleanor Roosevelt. Will Eleanor advise her on governing the American people?" (while smirking)
Or shall Trump pose the question: "Given her current obvious health problems, and admitting to hearing voices of dead people in her head, has Hillary been assessed by a health care professional?
Need an on-stage EMP booth, which both candidates step into to get pulsed, immediately before standing at clear podiums at next ‘debate’.
There you republicans go again, suggesting that Hillary's health is not perfect. Despite her age, she is as healthy as a 55 year old. Specifically, a 55 year old Hitler in 1944.
Who is the puppet master?
It would be better to capture the coaching and publish it after the next "debate".
OR
If she does not use it in the next debate, make up some coaching and publish it anyway. It is the seriousness of the charge, not its truth, that is important.
Well wearing an earpiece to the UN General Assembly would not be that noteworthy, if that’s the case. For the translations and all.
Her excuse is that W wore a device under his suit in one of his debates.
How would you describe yourself?
"Cheater. Liar. Reptile. Murderer."
Your pet peeves?
"Men who believe they should live."
Your life goal?:
"Become President before welcomed into the bowels of Hades as Queen. First lesbo President."
My ideal man:
"He has a vagina."
It’s likely encrypted traffic. They best you could do is jam the frequency range, you wouldn’t be able to listen in, or substitute your own message.
Incidentally, even consumer grade transceivers are digitally encrypted nowadays, which is great, because with remote controlled planes there is no longer any chance of one control interfering with another. All the planes operate on the same frequency, but the encryption is different for each.
If she announced tomorrow that it was a earring aid,would you believe it?
Does anyone remember when Bill Clinton announced he would be wearing hearing aids for a debate because he had hearing loss?
Trump just needs to ask a few times during the debate (or right at the start): “Hillary what is that in your ear? Are you being fed answers?”
even if it was bluetooth? Just curious.
Would be tragic if someone showed up with a SIGNAL JAMMER at the debates.
I wonder how much they had to pay a guy to put his hand up her butt to make her mouth move at the same time?
Look, she could stab Gulliani through his heart with the media watching and FILMING. Then, Hillary and the same media would tell us it is a hallucination or vast right-wing conspiracy.
The Media was not as blatant during the campaign in 2000 as they are today but MSNBC did call Florida early while the Panhandle was still voting. Aside from that, I see many similarities between the 2000 Campaigns and today. If you recall the debates, Gore was snarky, Mr. know it all, and he lost every single debate to the plain talking Bush. Al was also a dull, stiff Wooden Indian while campaigning and his running mate was a moderate. Lets see how this one plays out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.