HH: A big criticism I have of Trump-Pence. You guys bar some reporters from your campaigns, specifically the Washington Post. I've argued about this with Mr. Trump. It's not in the American tradition. Will you argue with him to lift that ban, because reporters are part of the game. And we shouldn't ban, Republicans should not be afraid of reporters. Will you do that?
MP: Well, I found out about that. We had a great rally the other night with Scott Walker in Wisconsin, and some of the local folks, some of the local folks you know, asked for credentials from reporters, and there a reporter that was not permitted in the setting. And I tell you, we're all talking about that. I had a long, I have a long history, as you well know, Hugh, of advocating and defending for a free and independent press.
HH: Yes
MP: You know, I authored legislation in the Congress. We actually got it passed once or twice, to create, you know, the ability to keep confidential sources confidential. So we're going to have those conversations internally, and I fully expect in the next 100 days, we're going to continue to be available to the media, whether they're fair or unfair, and we're going to take our case to the American people directly.
https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/759038185011687429
Just when I was starting to warm up to Mike Pence he has to go and say this. I don't know if this is an internal conversation where Trump himself is considering lifting this ban or whether Pence wants Trump to do it.
Here's the thing, I'm for a free press, but the bottom line is that press can be free but not fair. The sources blocked by Trump have given him consistently negative coverage in a way they that they have not given Hillary. Trump pays for the venues that he uses to campaign with. Why allow someone to come in that you know right off the bat is there to destroy you? It's easy for Hillary not to attack the media when the majority of news organizations are left leaning or full on left (yet she still won't do a press conference)?
The Washington Post is one in particular mentioned, so let me address that. Trump frequently did interviews with the Washington Post and allowed them to cover his campaign, this despite the fact they have a team of 20 plus reporters trying to destroy him. Trump's final straw was when they wrote an article saying that he said that Obama was involved in the Orlando shooting. They then modified their title a little, but Trump had had enough. This paper has written articles like the following (note - they like comparing him to Hitler):
The moment of truth: We must stop Trump
That is how the Sturmabteilung, also known as the Storm Troopers or Brownshirts got their start. They were the bullies formed by Adolf Hitler in Germany in the 1920s to defend his rallies. They, too, roughed up people, push and shoved, and threw out Hitlers rivals, all with the future German Chancellors approval.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/11/23/donald-trumps-rally-carries-echoes-of-hitlers-rise-to-power/
Donald Trumps rally carries echoes of Hitlers rise to power
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/11/23/donald-trumps-rally-carries-echoes-of-hitlers-rise-to-power/
The Hitler-ification of Donald Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/the-hitler-ification-of-donald-trump/
The theory of political leadership that Donald Trump shares with Adolf Hitler
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/25/the-theory-of-political-leadership-that-donald-trump-shares-with-adolf-hitler/
Donald Trump, Americas modern Mussolini
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-isnt-todays-wendell-willkie-hes-todays-benito-mussolini/2015/12/08/77c81b0c-9ddc-11e5-a3c5-c77f2cc5a43c_story.html
This is how fascism comes to America
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-how-fascism-comes-to-america/2016/05/17/c4e32c58-1c47-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html
In 1927, Fox News Service filmed Benito Mussolini telling immigrants to make America great
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/23/in-1927-fox-news-service-filmed-benito-mussolini-telling-immigrants-to-make-america-great/
Trump is following in the path of despots
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/following-the-path-of-despots/2016/07/22/c41b2896-5047-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html
Trumps favorite dictators: In reviled tyrants, GOP nominee finds traits to praise
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3447068/posts
This was based on a Hillary press release about Trump liking dictators. I did a long rebuttal to this article in post 1. Multiple media outlets did a story on Hillary's press release. I documented that at the end of my post.
Donald Trump is a unique threat to American democracy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3452244/posts
I did a long rebuttal to this article in post 1 if you want to check it out, but the bottom line is that the paper wrote scathing things about Trump calling him "dangerous" and "unqualified". That was just in the first paragraph. It got worse. The article concluded with the paper saying they would either support Hillary or Gary Johnson. Well, there's no way in hell they are going to endorse Gary Johnson, and Gary Johnson can't win. Therefore, they endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Granted, a couple of those articles are opinion pieces, but not all, and the WaPo still printed them.
The Huffington Post, meanwhile, another paper banned by Trump, first refused to cover him and stuck him in the entertainment section of the paper. Then they realized they have to take him seriously, so now they put the following disclaimer under every article:
Editors note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims ― 1.6 billion members of an entire religion ― from entering the U.S.
That isn't even touching all the nasty articles I am sure the Huffington Post has written. (I wouldn't know. I rarely read the HuffPo.)
As far as Politico, I haven't followed their coverage, so I don't know what Trump's specific reason was on banning them. I do know why for the WaPo and HuffPo, though.
A point of note is Politico was a prominent feature in the Democrat Wikileaks emails. A frequent morning email sent had all the Politico headlines of the day. They didn't do that with other news sites. It seemed (from the emails I looked at), to always be Politico.
Leaked emails reveal Politico reporter made 'agreement' to send advanced Clinton story to DNC
http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-dnc-emails-wikileaks-2016-7
The Washington Post also got caught colluding with the DNC:
DNC Wikileaks Hack Outs Hillary Shill at Washington Post
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/07/dnc_wikileaks_hack_outs_hillary_shill_at_washington_post.html
THE BOTTOM LINE:
Why would you allow a paper that says such horrible things about you, that is working for your opponent as they have admitted, into your campaign? Why would the frog allow the scorpion to ride on its back? Is Mike Pence aware of what has been said by the Huffington Post and Washington Post? There is certainly no fair press there. They are there because they hate you and want to destroy you. They've made it clear.
Mike Pence appears to be taking the establishment Republican position that if we are just nice to the press, they will be fair. If we don't call them out, they will be fair. Tell me how that worked for George Bush in his last four years? How did it work for McCain? How did it work for Romney? They can be the nicest gentlemen you'll ever find, and that means nada because, in their eyes, the Democrat is better.
There was another thing Pence said today as well about not wanting name calling in politics, but that's a separate issue from this post.
shut up Pence...
never let your enemy (the media in this case) know your intentons
why would you tell them what you are thinking? never let anyone outside the family know what you are thinking.
...”available to the media, whether theyre fair or unfair,”
...nice to be optimistic but they will always, in the end, be unfair dbags. Actually, “unfair” isn’t correct. Lying sacks of shiite is more appropriate.
I’m not at all sure about Pence. To be honest, so far what I’ve seen, I don’t like.
If they are fake reporters why talk to them?
It’s more honest to ban them.
Trump’s handling of these problems is the reason he can overcome the lying media.
I will patiently wait for Trump to come out on this...
When and if he does, then is when I’ll decide to like it...I do believe Trump needs to have a little ‘chat’ about releasing something public...or maybe in this case, Pence did what his boss told him to do, but I’ll wait and see...
Pence is starting to become a liability.
WP and Politico both proven to be in the tank for Hillary, #neverTrump Hewitt knows that
Don’t do it Trump!
“Just when I was starting to warm up to Mike Pence he has to go and say this.”
When I heard that Trump had selected a running mate from among our irredeemably depraved and corrupt political class, I expected this sort of thing to happen.
I hope Trump takes his fists and pounds Pence in the face until he is unrecognizable.
Yes let media in to events. Distinguish the difference between a “journalist” and an “activist” disguised as a journalist! This is where the battle lines should be drawn.
Typical Good Cop/Bad Cop.
Pence: Well, as you know I like dealing with the press, even the unfair ones like you. But you know how Donald is, if you’re not fair, your organization is out.
Press: Blah Blah Blah Whine Whine Whine
Pence: Yes that is the way it has been done before, but if you’re not even going to try and be balanced, it’s going to make it that much tougher for me to sell Donald in letting your organization capitalize on the great ratings Donald provides news outlets.
Press: Blah Blah Blah Whine Whine Whine
Pence: Well, perhaps running some stories on the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton Cash movie and getting published Hillary’s Goldman Sachs speeches would be a good start. Why not get that done this week and let’s visit again, shall we? Thanks for stopping by.
Trump has got it also, but he knows exactly where he's running and you don't.
Leni
“Hey Mike, don’t turn into Joe.”
All news organizations should be required to state if they or their reporter has affiliation and scheming with the Dems. Put them on the spot. If none, if they agree to abide by traditional journalistic ethics and practices, then maybe let them in. Allowing people in that are partisan propagandists does not serve anyone well.
Notice how the reply to Trump shutting out hostile media is always some variation of “It’s not in the American tradition”.
Yeah, well, what happened to the “American tradition” of an objective media? News outlets that DIDN’T act like a broadcast arm of only ONE political party, refusing to say anything good about the opposing party while never saying anything bad about the party they’re blatantly supporting??
If American Media wants to suspend that great “American tradition” of being objective - and they definitely have - then they shouldn’t be too surprised if the people they always beat up on get tired of being beaten-up and say “no more”.
It’s not complicated. Want your access back, Big Media? Then stop with the ant-Trump hatefest. NOW.
Wow, very well done. Excellent research and argument, thank you! This is the type of rebuttal that needs to be made publicly. Collusion by so called free press and defense for Trump. Two birds, one stone.
:: You guys bar some reporters from your campaigns, specifically the Washington Post. I’ve argued about this with Mr. Trump. It’s not in the American tradition ::
Hmmmm...they also bar Constitutional carry at the campaign venues. Neither is THAT in the American tradition to so strictly control firearms.
Which is more important, Mr. Jackass?
Yeah, we don’t need to guess.
The press is the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party. They should be shaking down the 240 days without a press conference pantsuit express instead of whining about access. The press crying about ‘the American tradition’ is truly rich. Their tradition is in the rich tradition of Joseph Goebbels or Stalinist Pravda.