Posted on 07/07/2016 6:13:21 AM PDT by Jess Kitting
Hillary Rips Trump For Not Correcting Obama Muslim Question, But Her 2008 Obama Smearing Was Even Worse
Hillary Clinton denounced Donald Trump for not correcting a question at his Thursday rally insinuating the president isn’t American — calling the GOP front-runner “disturbing, and just plain wrong — yet she employed a very similar tactic during her primary campaign against then-Sen. Barack Obama during the 2008 election.
In 2008, Politico ran a piece criticizing Clinton’s campaign for supplying “Drudge Report” with a photo of Obama “dressed as a Somali Elder, during his visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Very OLD campaign ploy, Hitlery.
Since the Fraud began running, Republican candidates have been expected, nay demanded, by Big Media to refute any and all claims by supporters and plants alike that the leftists’ god is anything but a true American patriot and a Christian.
Trump loves America, Hillary loves money.
Photos such as these have been seen by many long before now. Today Washington Post is blasting BOR on FOX News for show photos of BO’B in Muslin garb at his half brothers wedding. Yes, BO’B was dressed in non-western gear, skirt and all. When BOR showed the photos last night he correctly stated these could not be verified as to where or when they were taken (nor at what actual event). Once again, the MFM makes themselves the story. Look! A squirrel sighting to give readers an opportunity to set aside the FBI whipping of Bill’s Hill. Anything but THAT!!!!!
Fox at the moment has two stories upping the rat party rabid plots. Ailes, Steve, Carlson being one and BO’B is perhaps not all American being the second. We AMERICANS have known of BO’B tendencies from the beginning This ‘news’ is of NO surprise to US
This has been making the rounds on FR since 2008. What's the big deal now?
Yes. An interesting twist here is that Hillary's campaign "planted" this story on Drudge in the first place (probably so that they could get mileage from it and then blame conservatives.)
Just like the "birther" thing, which also originated from Hillary's campaign but has been used to as a "weapon" against anyone who dares criticize Obama and his Leftist agenda.
So hillary, why would it be bad if obama WAS a muslim like his father?
( crickets)
That’s IT. Sorry, stated the paper was the Wash Post but actually seen in Daily Mail I believe. Whatever, it was seen. As to the above photo; BO’B was has a yearning to wear skirts whenever, wherever possible. Does he go the ‘Kramer route’ and let it all hang out?
It has resurfaced today on The Drudge Report. Probably because of comments made by Bill O'reilly.
Daily Mail (July 7, 2016)
Says the queen who has not spoken to the press or taken questions in over 200 days.
bammy and hillary are using muzzieys for political gain. They have given them a free pass to do whatever they want, including killing and raping, in return for their votes and contributions.
Reminds me of the Willie Horton ads that were used to accuse the GHW Bush campaign of racism in 1988, when the first candidate to bring up the issue of Willie Horton was ‘rat candidate Al Gore.
Japan and Switzerland know how to handle their Muslim problem.
Japanese Court Rules Blanket Surveillance Of Muslims Is ‘Necessary’ To Stop Terrorism
The Daily Caller ^ | June 30, 2016 | Jacob Bojesson
Posted on 7/1/2016, 12:21:13 AM by 2ndDivisionVet
Muslims in Japan lost a lawsuit over the government’s surveillance of them in May, with the court saying it’s a “necessary” counter-terrorism tactic.
Japanese police have monitored places of worship, halal restaurants and Muslim organizations for years in what they label a counter-terrorism measure. A 2010 leak of 114 Japanese police files quickly spread across the world with 10,000 downloads in 20 countries. The files contained personal information of 72,000 Muslims in several countries, showing just how widespread the surveillance is.
A group of 17 Muslims living in Japan sued the government for infringing on their constitutional rights. The Muslims eventually received close to $900,000 in compensation, but the country’s Supreme Court still finds the profiling and surveillance tactics “necessary and inevitable” to prevent terrorism.
“We were told we don’t have a constitutional case,” said Junko Hayashi, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, according to Al Jazeera. “We’re still trying to figure out, how is it not constitutional?”
The court case didn’t make much noise in Japan — the debate instead focused on how the leak will hurt counter-terrorism efforts in the future.
About 70,000 Muslims live in Japan. The vast majority, 90 percent, are foreigners
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3445353/posts
Swiss Do the Unthinkable: Deny Muslims Citizenship
informationliberation.com ^ | 7/1/2016 | Chris Menahan
Posted on 7/4/2016, 6:13:18 AM by rktman
In a move which no doubt has American immigration officials baffled, the Swiss are denying citizenship to Muslim after Muslim for failing to integrate into their society!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3446139/posts
Hillary will have to kiss the ground Obama walks on from now until the election, because he and his administration just pulled her bacon (irony) out of the email scandal fire.
Just a couple of weeks ago, she was berating the inadequate economy. At their joint appearance this week, Obama basically chided her about dissing his grand economy [those faked numbers are all that makes his legacy look good — on paper, at least], and now Hillary must also support that, too.
Their actions cemented their MAD* relationship.
*MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction. If Obama tried to take down a Clinton, the Clintons have enough to respond in kind. Thus, they have a quid pro quo arrangement for mutual survival.
Hopefully Trump for President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.