old piano legs has competition!
Posted on 07/03/2016 6:19:42 AM PDT by KeyLargo
CNN reports no charges against Hillary
Sources say announcement comes in 2 weeks following FBI interview
In the wake of Hillary Clinton’s interview with the FBI at the agency’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. Saturday, CNN reports from unnamed sources that “within the next two weeks or so, the expectation is there will be an announcement of no charges being brought against Clinton” so long as no evidence of wrongdoing emerges from her interview with the FBI.
“CNN has previously reported no charges were expected to be brought against Clinton,” noted CNN, “because the investigators had not found evidence to warrant charges, according to multiple law enforcement officials. A Democrat close to Clinton said Saturday the campaign believes the FBI will announce its decision before the conventions. … Sources familiar with the investigation had previously told CNN the Justice Department’s aim was to wrap up before the Republican and Democratic conventions later this month. The timing is crucial, because if Clinton were to be indicted before the convention, Democrats could perhaps nominate another candidate.”
Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill confirmed the three and a half hour interview was voluntary. “Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was secretary,” he said in a statement.
Clinton told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Saturday evening the interview was something “I had been eager to do.”
CNN’s senior producer Edward Mejia Davis posted a tweet which contained a question to Clinton from MSNBC’s Chuck Todd: “There are news reports out there that indicate that no charges may be brought against you. Were you given that indication today that no charges will be filed? Are you confident that no charges will be filed?”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Wonder what the secret service idiot is pointing to on that hideous woman? Either her gigantic candles or her grizzly bear-sized fat ass. (I must say, she is wearing the right color dress for any clandestine meeting with BJ. She certainly has all the charm of a typical Clinton blow-jobber).
Maybe he’s just displaying his democrat-approved weapon?
To: All
Keeping this post handy; might be pertinant in 2005 or 2009.
43 Posted on 03/10/2002 09:38:33 PST by Kerensky
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | Top | Last ]
OR 2017 ...
“have no idea who has what - from Pagliano to Russian hackers, stuff could be anywhere.”
And it is anywhere. You are right, they have lost control, but, that will not prevent Lynch from claiming there is not enough evidence to bring it to even a grand jury...especially a grand jury since the Klintoons havent had much luck with those.
Ultimately, it’s better for Trump. There was never a world where he would run against an indicted Clinton. Her indictment = her replacement by a far more popular Democrat.
I can hold a conversation with someone I know that I meet in a ‘chance encounter’.
However:
It DOES NOT involve:
a half hour or more of time
2 different airplanes
an airport in Arizona
Bet they both thought no one would see them there-———
I hope Trump appoints Judge Pirro as Attorney General on Jan 21, 2017.
Time to clean out the corruption in Washington——down to the lowest level.
Subway ought to dedicate a new sandwich to the Attorney General and call it a Foot Long and a Lynch Wide!!!!!!
We don’t know who was there. Her attorneys joined her in the building. We have no clue . It was videoed ( redundant systems). I understand the leaking and the “sources” but I can not see any way she did not violate numerous laws unless we have reached the very pit if political corruption. I cannot believe the FBI would destroy it integrity forever over hillary. We will see. There is nothing she can say. The element of intent is not required. Ask General Petraeus. He took a calendar home. She took a server and thousands of government documents some of which were classified top secret. She broke the law . Now we will see if she is above that law.
Time for Gucifer(2), Snowden, etc. to release the records!
There definitely is two Americas.
She’d be great......has the prosecutorial experience, as well.
It does agree with what many FReepers are predicting. That she’s going to get away with it. “Liberals” will vote for her. A hardened criminal. People from Mexico are used to that shit though, and that’s why “liberals” want so many of them in the country.
When Scooter Libby's recollection of a conversation differed from Tim Russert's, the assumption was that Russert was telling the truth and therefore Libby was lying...because the government was out to get Libby.
If Hillary's answers differ from the answers they got from others, they can decide that Hillary's version is the right one...and go after the others for lying (if they are not loyal team members).
Since the "voluntary" interview was just yesterday, I expect they will take some days before reaching a decision to make it look like they are carefully comparing the answers they got from various people.
old piano legs has competition!
She was questioned by the feds. Show me where the new is that shes gong to walk
She was questioned by the feds. Period. Show me where the news is that shes gong to walk
“She was questioned by the feds. Period. Show me where the news is that shes gong to walk”
And you were saying?
FBI JAMES COMEY JUST STATED:
“NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD TAKE SUCH A CASE.”
“NO INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT ACTS FOUND ON THE PART OF HILLARY CLINTON”
And you were saying?
FBI JAMES COMEY JUST STATED:
“NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD TAKE SUCH A CASE.”
“NO INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT ACTS FOUND ON THE PART OF HILLARY CLINTON”
FBI JAMES COMEY JUST STATED:
“NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD TAKE SUCH A CASE.”
“NO INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT ACTS FOUND ON THE PART OF HILLARY CLINTON”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.