You bad old Freepers don't need any data ... because you'll just use it to disprove the facts that we have already established as true!
You bad old Freepers don't need any data ... because you'll just use it to disprove the facts that we have already established as true!
We are sciencers. We don’t need no steenking data.
Liar.
Michael Mann has been increasingly unnecessary for quite a while. Surprised that Penn State keeps him.
Michael Mann, con artist and pseudo-scientist
Still trying to remain relevant, even after his work was decisively proven false; not just false, but falsified.
This is, of course, the end-game for the warmists. Since the data, even after massaging, still stubbornly refuses to produce the catastrophic warming they so desperately desire, they now have resorted to claiming that the data isn’t important. That if they say climate change is happening, then we must believe it. I guess this is the climatological equivalent of Caitlin Jenner.
We already altered and manipupted the data, but we were caught.
So we dont get caught anymore, we all just say we dont need any more data.
So, you're a liar. We get it.
Since I saw the headline I have the Miami Vice theme song in my head.
If you cannot replicate your results, you are a propagandist.
I am absolutely FURIOUS that Peer Review is now corrupted.
“I can see climate change from my front yard.” Right. Tina Fey where are you?
Grant money suckerupper.
trying to tease out the signal of human-caused climate change
This ain’t the “Scientific Method”.
I nominate this clown for president of the “Flat Earth Society”
Translation - “We have to throw out the data because the facts don’t fit our conclusion.”
Michael Mann is about as much of a scientist as Paul Krugman is an economist.
It's still cold in the winter and warm in the summer and the Lake Level is the same as it was 200 years ago.
Some years it's damn cold and some years it's damn hot...and that's the way it is.
Climate change is an illusion....and the bottom line...it's all about money.
We're such a miniscule part of the universe. We're so vain.
We don’t need data anymore because we all agree the science is settled.
Wow. That makes the skull-bump analyzers in the 19th century look like wizards of scientific method.
Climate change isn’t dangerous, it’s always happened and will continue.
What’s dangerous is the idea that the climate can be run better by government than by nature.
OK, Mr. (not Dr.) Mann, what IS the optimum temperature for Earth? What IS the perfect number of storms and lightning strikes? What is the exact amount of rain and snow that should fall? Now, what is all that in every season and in every location on the planet?
You can’t decide if CHANGE is good or bad unless you know what the ideal is.
Obama promised CHANGE. You assumed that it would be good. He changed America away from the ideal, so it is bad. If you are too stupid to see that change away from freedom is bad, then why should be accept anything you say on something as complicated as climate.