Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Vacates McDonnell's Corruption Conviction
Daily Press ^
| 27 June 2013
| Travis Fain
Posted on 06/27/2016 7:43:16 AM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
The U.S. Supreme Court vacated former Gov. Bob McDonnell's conviction on corruption charges Monday morning.
The decision was unanimous, according to SCOTUSblog, which is tracking opinion releases this morning in Washington, D.C. The court overturned a decsion that rose out of the U.S. District Court in Richmond, then was affirmed by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The nut of the government's case against McDonnell, and his wife Maureen, was this: In taking some $177,000 in gifts and loans from businessman Jonnie Williams, and then setting meetings Williams sought to gain legitimacy for a controversial dietary supplement, the McDonnells engaged in a quid-pro-quo that amounted to bribery.
Williams struck an immunity deal and testified that he was trying to buy the McDonnell's help.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailypress.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bobmcdonnell; corruption; lawsuit; mcdonnell; rpv; ruling; scotus; virginia; virginiagop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Not totally unexpected, given the vagueness of Virginia's public corruption laws at the time--and the fact that past governors (including Tim Kaine) also accepted gifts while in office. What was surprising was SCOTUS's unanimous decision to vacate the conviction, giving some idea of what the justices thought of the original case, the jury's decision and the affirmation of McDonnell's conviction by the 4th Circuit.
Unclear if Obama Justice Department will go ahead with a retrial or simply drop the charges.
To: ExNewsExSpook
The title says it all. Makes it more difficult to obtain corruption charges against elected officials. They can use this decision to their own personal advantage.
2
posted on
06/27/2016 7:47:45 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Donald Trump is the biggest threat to the New World Order since Barry Goldwater)
To: ExNewsExSpook
The democrats got their way: Virginia went blue that year and a fairly popular governor was taken out of the running for future public office. I hope this ruling changes McDonnell’s future. I’ll vote for him again.
3
posted on
06/27/2016 7:47:48 AM PDT
by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
To: ExNewsExSpook
It is difficult to fault unanimous decisions.
4
posted on
06/27/2016 7:48:27 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: ExNewsExSpook
I am of two minds on this Is this just another example of two standards of justice, one for the elites and one for the rest of us? Can we expect similar treatment for Hillary?
Or is this a case of justice being applied inappropriately on a partisan basis?
5
posted on
06/27/2016 7:48:27 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: ExNewsExSpook
Yep, Court throws out the democrats trumped up charges against McDonnell. Of course the charges served their purpose, they tainted McDonnell and his successor enough for Clinton shill Terry McCauliff (who ironically is now also under federal investigation) to get elected.
6
posted on
06/27/2016 7:49:24 AM PDT
by
apillar
To: kabar
Every politician in Va was hoping for an overturn so they wouldn’t have to suffer under the same rules.
This was merely an attempt to damage McConnell so he could run for higher office.
7
posted on
06/27/2016 7:50:49 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: kabar
This was a hit job on Bob McDonnell. I think the most he did to "use his influence" is take out a bottle of Williams' supplement and show it around at a cabinet meeting.
That being said, McDonnell tried to play nice with the Dems and this is what he got. And he'd probably do it again.
8
posted on
06/27/2016 7:53:08 AM PDT
by
hemogoblin
(We're all on Flight 93, now)
To: HokieMom
I would vote for him too. This was clearly a political move by the govt.McDonnell would possible have been a strong presidential candidate. He did absolutely nothing wrong. He should receive money from the govt for anytime he spent in jail on these banana republic charges.
9
posted on
06/27/2016 7:55:39 AM PDT
by
Carry me back
(Cut the feds by 90%9)
To: apillar
Does McDonnell get to recover court costs?
10
posted on
06/27/2016 7:55:55 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: hemogoblin
One thing the pubbies are SO STUPID about is the DEMS play HARD BALL Delay knows this as well our side are a buch of P$$&y’s plain and simple, HOWEVER we all know NOW they have AKWAYS been on the same side!!!
To: ExNewsExSpook
Hillary, call on line one. Please pick up on the red courtesy phone.......................
12
posted on
06/27/2016 7:57:05 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
To: HokieMom
This unanimous decision clearing him doesn’t make him any smarter. What he did was foolish even if it wasn’t criminal.
And this does clear the way for corrupt dims to continue what they’re doing. All those Assemblymen in New York State, and all the way up to the governor, will now skate.
13
posted on
06/27/2016 7:57:32 AM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: ZULU
Corruption is the primary benefit of elected office. That is why politicians spend millions of dollars to serve the people.
To: Carry me back
I wonder if he’s allowed to sue those who wrongly persecuted him.
15
posted on
06/27/2016 7:58:16 AM PDT
by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
To: ExNewsExSpook
I wish BobMac had taken one for the team
16
posted on
06/27/2016 7:58:58 AM PDT
by
Lisbon1940
(No full-term Governors)
To: ExNewsExSpook
Rat poison to exterminate those that brought the charges is required.
17
posted on
06/27/2016 8:05:22 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
To: HokieMom
Why would you vote for a guy who at the very least showed poor judgement?
18
posted on
06/27/2016 8:08:55 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: VanShuyten
<< What he did was foolish even if it wasnt criminal. >>
Agree with you there. Only Democrats are allowed to do what he did without penalty.
19
posted on
06/27/2016 8:09:12 AM PDT
by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Perhaps he’s learned. Who among us hasn’t benefited from the wisdom of our previous poor decisions.
20
posted on
06/27/2016 8:11:09 AM PDT
by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson