Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let Convention Choose Principles over “Presumptive” Candidate
Townhall.com ^ | June 27, 2016 | Terry Paulson

Posted on 06/27/2016 5:40:55 AM PDT by winner3000

As both parties rapidly approach their respective nominating conventions, it’s clear that both parties are not unified. The Republican Party still has a choice in Cleveland. Will the party choose established Republican principles or their “presumptive” candidate who has the necessary delegates but wants to do this campaign his way?

In response to House Speaker Paul Ryan’s continued call for Trump to support conservative principles in the party plank, Donald Trump suggests that the GOP leaders “have to get a lot tougher and be quiet. Just please be quiet, don’t talk…. We have to have our Republicans either stick together or let me just do it by myself. I’ll do very well.”

The Wisconsin Republican reminded Trump that presidents and congressional leaders represent separate but equal branches of government. Ryan vowed to “robustly defend the separation of powers.”

As James Madison wrote in Federalist 51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Checks and balances are critical to our republic and should be to our political parties. We don’t need subservient, “quiet” party delegates; we need principled, assertive delegates willing to exercise their will in preserving liberty, preventing tyranny, promoting effective government leaders, and protecting the reputation of the party. Presidents need constraints, and so do candidates. It’s time for Donald Trump to start experiencing the checks and balances every president faces.

Donald Trump has run as a Republican, but it’s not clear that he actually shares the core principles of the party. Presidents come and go, but core principles must be preserved through good and bad administrations for America to endure and prosper.

If Republican voters knew that Donald Trump did not support some core Republican principles, it’s not clear he would’ve ever become the party’s candidate. It’s time for the GOP to free its convention delegates to vote their conscience in light of Trump’s arrogance. It’s not time for the GOP to be quiet. It’s time for them to establish a convention “conscience clause” and nominate a candidate who actually supports what they believe.

There are signs that many of the party faithful are less than inspired by Trump’s antics and poorly organized campaign. His poll numbers are down and both the GOP and Trump are having trouble raising campaign funds. Truly great negotiators don’t go it alone. Unfortunately, Trump’s plan to Make America Great Again has a recurring theme song, “My way or the highway!” If he can’t put agreed upon party principles at the core of his campaign, maybe it’s time for him to take the highway.

After all, until the convention actually nominates Donald Trump, he remains the “presumptive” candidate. His supporters will say that he earned the delegates and deserves to be nominated. Yes, but the unique nature of this election warrants special consideration. The sheer number of candidates made his early name-recognition an asset. He was combative instead of clear on the principles and positions he would espouse. As other established mainline candidates split votes, his “outsider” position garnered a winning faction that provided enough votes to secure the delegates he needed.

Freeing the delegates to vote their conscience will not ensure that Trump will lose. In fact, since most of the delegates would have been selected to support him, many will continue to support him. If he truly has the positions and principles needed to Make America Great Again, he’ll earn the delegate votes needed, even if they’re free to vote for someone else. Earning their nomination in an open convention will help bring the doubters on board.

Trump wants the party leaders to be quiet and subservient. The party needs them to be strong, assertive, and supportive of the long-standing core Republican Party principles. An open convention fight could be divisive, chaotic, and potentially dangerous to the party, but so is a rogue candidate that the party faithful can’t support and independents dislike. Any principled candidate who could truly unite this party at the convention would have enough time to rally support and defeat a weak Democratic candidate like Hillary Clinton. May it be so.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; gopnomination; nevertrump; newyork; shill; terrypaulson; townhall; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Another anti-Trump tirade by the tired tittering class. After the inspiration provided by our British counterpart, here's a tired pro-establishment figure trying to convince us to disregard the actual votes of regular Republican primary voters and let the political class ("the convention") chose our candidate for us! Of all the sleazy, disgusting filth, that's pretty low. Sorry Mr. Paulson, your highness, but though Trump is not my first choice, he has earned the respect of many people I respect a heck of a lot more than you and the rest of the GOP wimp class. I have never seen the passion you have displayed against the person who has followed the rules and collected more than the required number of delegates. Where was this passion when it was time to fight Obama? Close the border, defund Obama's priorities, fight his executive orders? Were you guys too busy? I am about to stop reading Townhall till at least after the election. Oh, and of course, there was no way to respond to the article online. Another dirty trick learned from the Democrat media. You guys are still jerks.
1 posted on 06/27/2016 5:40:55 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: winner3000

For the last few years, principle #1 has been “voters don’t matter”. Why change now?


2 posted on 06/27/2016 5:44:27 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

“Freeing the delegates to vote their conscience...”

_______________________________________

Delegates must vote the will of their state’s citizens. It has nothing to do with “conscience”.

Paulson can go pound sand. We’re over the GOPe. Deal with it.


3 posted on 06/27/2016 5:45:08 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

his sentence sums it up rather nicely: “Will the party choose established Republican principles or their “presumptive” candidate who has the necessary delegates but wants to do this campaign his way?”

We’ve been doing it “their” way for a long time; Dole, McCain, Romney anyone? Now it’s time to do it “our” way.


4 posted on 06/27/2016 5:46:25 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

The Cheap Labor Express has not given up trying to block the citizens from stopping them.


5 posted on 06/27/2016 5:47:25 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

To quote Ted Cruz:

“The voters have spoken.”


6 posted on 06/27/2016 5:50:10 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

We’ve seen the current “core principles of the party” and we don’t like it.


7 posted on 06/27/2016 5:50:12 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Ryan “supports” conservative principles in his speeches.

Then he goes out to support and enable the establishment Uniparty in the real world.

How many times has he used Congress’s “power of the purse” to stop Obama’s globalist, socialist, racist, Islamic agenda?


8 posted on 06/27/2016 5:50:16 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals Were Rebublicans 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
...We don’t need subservient, “quiet” party delegates; we need principled, assertive delegates willing to exercise their will in preserving liberty, preventing tyranny, promoting effective government leaders, and protecting the reputation of the party.

My my. Paulsen, motivational dipshit he is, actually has the b@lls to write that Federalist Papers reference and compare it to our elected Republican Leadership and its acolytes of today? Principled? Preventing Tyranny? Really?

The rest of his article can be disregarded purely because of this one glaring lie. I'll their damned house of cards fall to the and burn right down to the foundation I countenance what this traitor and other "principled" Republicans are spewing.

9 posted on 06/27/2016 5:50:35 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

I’m confused... What ARE the core beliefs of the GOP?


10 posted on 06/27/2016 5:51:27 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the '17th amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
Let Convention Choose Principles over “Presumptive” Candidate

Thus taking away the votes of the majority of Republican voters in the country and paving the way for a Marxist lesbian to become our President.

No thanks.

11 posted on 06/27/2016 5:52:25 AM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (ABM - Anyone But McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

You gotta remember Townhall is Salem Media Group - the anti-American anti-voter GOPe establishment hack group who owns Erick Erickson, Michael Graham, Hot Air, and on and on and on...they’re full blown open borders.


12 posted on 06/27/2016 5:52:48 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ

Democrat Lite


13 posted on 06/27/2016 6:00:16 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Paul Ryan doesn’t support conservatives principles, nor does Cruz, Bush, Romney or the other hacks in leadership positions.


14 posted on 06/27/2016 6:12:20 AM PDT by stockpirate (Make America Mexico Again - MAMA end sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Republican principles? They have principles?
Who knew???


15 posted on 06/27/2016 6:13:15 AM PDT by null and void (Has there ever been a death associated with the Clintons that *wasn't* beneficial to them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

It’s a tossup as to who has been more disappointing, Cruz or Ryan.


16 posted on 06/27/2016 6:13:29 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

“The Wisconsin Republican reminded Trump that presidents and congressional leaders represent separate but equal branches of government.”

Could have fooled me these past 8 years.


17 posted on 06/27/2016 6:13:35 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior
“Freeing the delegates to vote their conscience...”

My conscience says not to vote for someone they, and not us, chose.

My conscience says not to vote republican all the way down ticket, if it comes to that.

There are other parties and independents.

18 posted on 06/27/2016 6:16:44 AM PDT by null and void (Has there ever been a death associated with the Clintons that *wasn't* beneficial to them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

What about the Democrat convention, with its choice between a thoroughly nasty criminal and an aging avowed socialist? Won’t THEY be pushing for some new blood? < /sarc >


19 posted on 06/27/2016 6:18:58 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

winner3000 wrote: “... here’s a tired pro-establishment figure trying to convince us to disregard the actual votes of regular Republican primary voters and let the political class (”the convention”) chose our candidate for us!”

We are truly fortunate to have a political class which is so inspired to devote their energy and intellect to saving we, the benighted ones, from ourselves.


20 posted on 06/27/2016 6:18:59 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson