Should We Fear Islam?

Should we fear Islam? This Czech lawyer says: “We should fight against Islam and beat it”

The following speech was given last Wednesday (May 18, 2016) in Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Parliament by a lawyer and activist named Klára Samková. Her presentation was part of a discussion forum on the topic “Should We Fear Islam” organized by the Czech MP Zdeněk Soukup.

Ms. Samková’s strong words concerning Islam have gained widespread attention on the Internet, and will presumably earn her a death fatwa, if they haven’t already.

This is one of the most brilliant summaries of Islam that I have ever heard. The fact that it took place in the Czech Parliament is amazing and heartening.

Many thanks to Xanthippa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

00:20 Hello, 00:24 So, it has been left to me alone, even though I was informed 00:28 that the legal aspects 00:32 will be addressed by two of us, so I had 00:36 … had I know that 00:40 it would all be left to me alone, I might have 00:44 prepared a different report. Nonetheless, now, I will be [addressing] it all. Well… 00:48 This is what I have prepared: Dear guests, 00:52 Today’s conference is supposed to help to answer the question 00:56 whether we should be afraid of Islam. My answer 01:00 is straightforward: we should definitely 01:04 not be afraid of Islam. We should deal with it in the same way 01:08 in which the European civilization has successfully 01:13 dealt with all totalitarian and inhuman regimes 01:17 that it had to face during more than 2,000 years of its history. 01:21 In particular, we should fight against Islam, 01:25 beat it, and prevent its proliferation once and for all, 01:29 just as in the case of previous monstrous ideologies, 01:33 declare the very existence of Islam as a criminal act 01:37 that contradicts human nature, freedom, 01:41 and particularly human dignity. 01:45 Because that’s exactly what Islam is, 01:49 namely a system contradicting the human nature, freedom, 01:53 and dignity. It is the same as Nazism, 01:57 fascism, and communism used to be. 02:01 Even though it hides, pretending to be a religion, when in reality 02:05 it is primarily a criminal state and run by criminals’ 02:09 ideology, with an unreformable system of governance. 02:13 Islam is hiding behind 02:17 the mask of religion 02:21 for two reasons. 02:26 [Interjection: Mme. Doctor, is this not beyond the border?] 02:30 This is not beyond the border. [Interjection: No, today, we have agreed —] 02:34 [Interjection: I would appreciate (?), but —] 02:38 Perfect! So my opinion… that’s exactly — 02:42 That’s exactly what is possible here! The moment when 02:46 a person states, when I state my opinion 02:50 on Islam, which is supported by laws, 02:54 well, that is not possible! 02:58 Should I continue or not? [Moderator: No.] I should not continue. Excellent! [Moderator: Thank you.] 03:02 Audience: Shame! Shame! 03:06 Panelist: … Some common, factual… (inaudible) 03:10 [Hum from audience] Dr. Samkova: Truly unbelievable! 03:14 Moderator: We came together here today in order 03:18 to exchange information, so we could exchange views 03:22 and opinions. Audience: In that case, you should first write on the front… 03:26 [Audience hum — incomprehensible] 03:30 Audience member: So they would first prepare their presentations. Mme. Doctor is stating her 03:34 opinion. So kindly let her finish speaking! 03:38 Moderator: This is not an opinion, this is propaganda. 03:43 And to promote here individual political opinions 03:47 Audience member: In that case… (drowned out) 03:51 Are you the one who has the right to decide what is propaganda? You know 03:55 what Mme. Doctor wants to say? Moderator: I heard (?) Islam! 04:03 Panelist: Pardon me, but I think that it would be very good for it to be [spoken] out loud. Because 04:07 otherwise, she will look like, that, in reality, it is forbidden to say 04:11 [words drowned out by applause] 04:15 I have no objection to it, after all, it is 04:19 (mumbles) I’m just answering 04:23 all the demands (?), so 04:27 …legally… do not want to breach rules, some ambassadors… 04:31 …to hear such… their religion… 04:39 … that would be… as regards to… 04:43 Panelist: if Mme. Doctor were to, a little bit, soften her vocabulary… 04:47 I would very unhappy if, here, now, how could I say… 04:51 (?), for now, trying very hard (?) 04:55 (?) if it would perhaps be possible to 04:59 unlike those of you who have (?) 05:03 if, in her presentation, there was emphasis given (?) 05:08 because this has been, really, the only presentation which contained concrete suggestions 05:12 whether we shall discuss them, or if we may not have to. 05:16 So, I ask for one thing: let’s tone it down a little bit 05:20 The rhetoric, let Mrs. Samkova finish speaking, 05:24 and then you can revisit it in a good discussion. (?) 05:28 Moderator: All right… (?) 05:32 Moderator: Mme. Doctor, have you understood? 05:36 [incomprehensible] 05:40 Moderator: Which way is it possible to put pressure on you? 05:44 Through censorship! 05:48 If, again, you don’t like what I say, stop me! [Moderator: No, as long as you will 05:52 not as (?), and as your opinion. Dr. S: I am presenting it as my opinion! 05:56 As my personal opinion! Does it look like I’m hiding behind anyone? [Moderator: No, we here… 06:00 Moderator: you have pronounced here certain (?)… ] And I think that it is so. 06:04 That is my personal opinion. 06:08 Thank you! Unlike others, I do not 06:12 hide behind my employer, religion or even 06:16 other organizations. 06:20 Moderator: Nor do I, and my only aim that 06:24 how shall I put it, yes, so that all would listen. 06:28 So that nobody would have a reason to leave this discussion. 06:32 So, I thank you (inaudible). 06:37 Islam pretends to be a religion for two reasons. The first is 06:41 is the historical rise of Islam, which did not permit any different form of 06:45 ideological presentation other than just [this] religion. 06:49 Not even in ancient Greece was it permitted to form 06:53 philosophical constructs, independently of the State religion, 06:57 as Socrates could tell us. And it was 07:01 even less possible to create a conceptual paradigm of a character other 07:05 than religious in the seventh century A.D., 07:09 at the edge of what was the civilised world at the time. 07:13 The second reason why Islam 07:17 hides behind the religious mask is its permanent, 07:21 and purposeful abuse of what the Euro-American legal 07:25 system and values, which civilisation 07:29 originally built on Judeo-Christian foundation, have achieved. 07:33 There is nothing better and more effective 07:37 than abusing your enemy’s system of values, 07:41 while simultaneously not sharing this system. 07:45 And that’s exactly how Islam behaves. It demands protection 07:49 according to our traditions, which it thus abuses, 07:53 without being willing to reciprocate. 07:57 It relies on our traditions, appeals to them, 08:01 while behind our backs, it is laughing at us and our system of values. 08:05 Let us first of all look at why it is 08:10 absolutely correct to place Islam at the same level as a totalitarian regime. 08:14 Islam, even though it declares itself to be a religion, 08:18 is primarily a system of governance, in which 08:22 in which God has only a representative position, 08:26 while the main content of Islam is the creation of state 08:30 governance. Unlike Christianity, Hinduism 08:34 Buddhism, Taoism or Shintoism, at the core 08:38 of Islam is law, that is, Sharia law. 08:42 This is an integral part of Islamic ideology 08:46 and it is inseparable from it – and in this I fully 08:50 agree with the currently present Mr. (?) [fellow panelist]. 08:54 It forms the most intrinsic content of Islam, in which rules, which are 08:58 declared to be religious, or perhaps ethical, make up only 09:02 the secondary and marginal content of this ideology. 09:06 In Islam, the idea of religion as a private matter, 09:10 as a personal affair of each individual, is absolutely unacceptable. 09:14 Yet, it is precisely on this principle on which 09:18 today’s Christianity, and the civilization which grew from it, are built. 09:22 It is a private relationship of an individual with God, 09:26 facilitated, more or less, by one of the religious organizations. Even those 09:30 members of our civilized sphere which pronounce themselves to be atheists, 09:35 that is, those who claim that they do not believe in a God, 09:39 automatically draw their attitudes to life from the Christian traditions, 09:43 while these traditions take the form of either folklore 09:47 or the form of cultural elements automatically presumed, 09:51 thanks to which even they share in generally Christian 09:55 European and America’s spirit. It is necessary to 09:59 stress again that this attitude is not just unacceptable to Islam, 10:03 but is denounced by it and directly called a crime. 10:07 Islam rejects the individual conception of belief 10:11 in God, and in a totalitarian manner, it prohibits 10:15 all doubts about it itself. 10:19 If anyone believes we have no right to judge what is totalitarianism 10:23 and domination, and that we have no right to say this about Islam, 10:27 then I say that in a country which spent 300 years under the domination of foreign rulers, 10:31 and in the last 78 years, spent 48 years 10:35 under totalitarian regimes, 10:39 we have trained our antennae rather well 10:43 to detect precisely totalitarianism and domination, 10:47 and we can recognize it at first glance. 10:51 We have the right and the ability to recognize it and judge it. 10:55 Islam does not share the European concept of enlightenment of social 10:59 progress, which lies in the future. According to Islam, the good times have already passed, 11:04 — in the era of Prophet Mohammed. 11:08 The best things that could be done, have already been done and the best, 11:12 and the only, ideas that make sense have already been written, that is the Koran. 11:16 In its essence, Islam is 11:20 a religion based on the book of Ecclesiastes which, more than a thousand years 11:24 before Mohammed stated: “What benefit does man gain 11:28 from his unending toil, from toiling under 11:32 under the sun? Generations come and 11:36 generations go, but the Earth remains forever.” 11:40 Judaism, Christianity, and the civilization that arose from them, 11:44 this unjustified skepticism, 11:48 this contempt for one’s own self, all this [our civilization] has overcome. 11:52 But Islam has remained the still-born child of gnosis, 11:56 deformed and monstrously mutated, longing 12:00 for return into a merged union with the Universe, into a retarded 12:04 obsessive, psychopathic, paranoid concept 12:08 of the exceptional nature of one’s own path towards the reunification 12:12 of the essence of the devotee with God. [Moderator: Well, this is again your opinion.] 12:16 [Moderator: nothing more.] Dr. Samkova: It is an opinion, Mr. Editor 12:20 [sound covered up by noise] 12:24 [Moderator: If you are going to…] [unclear] Dr. Samkova: (?) perhaps it will be necessary… 12:28 to return to Gnostic texts of the third [very unclear, best approximation] 12:32 [unclear] Moderator: And that was supposed to be [unclear] serious? 12:37 Even that is my right. 12:41 From this concept, even through Islam, there flows the all-encompassing notion 12:45 of equating matter with Evil, from which springs the contempt for our 12:49 civilization, which is thus considered matter-based, 12:53 Evil in its essence, and in opposition to God. 12:57 It is real tragedy for the Muslims themselves, that 13:01 by entering this blind alley, 13:05 Islam has forever closed its path to God. 13:09 Depression, extinction, disbelief in humans and their individual 13:13 irreplaceable value, disbelief in the dignity 13:17 of every human being, regardless of their characteristics, such as 13:21 religion, social status, gender and nationality, 13:25 this is what defines Islam. 13:29 Islam has rejected philosophy, as we know it, 13:33 that is, as an opportunity for a rational and critical view of reality. 13:37 This attitude to Islam blocks even just thinking through ideas 13:41 on human freedom, dignity, the role of a person and the State, 13:45 and, paradoxically, also reflecting on God, 13:49 which have become, in the context of Euro-American civilization, 13:53 an integral component of the thoughtful deliberations pursued by top scientists 13:57 astrophysicists, mathematicians and biologists, 14:01 who, through the results of their research, touch the essence of the Universe 14:06 and thus the very essence of God. However, for Muslims, 14:10 this contact with God is forever, until the Day of Judgment, closed, 14:14 since their own ideology lost its contact with God 14:18 though the death of Mohammed. How immensely 14:22 desperate their life must be when it’s essentially 14:26 just waiting for death! The results of this total 14:30 space-time paralysis of Islam are the very nations 14:34 suffering under Muslim ideology, who are the ones most devastated. 14:38 It is they, and their citizens, who are 14:42 through this dismal pseudo-religious state, stripped of their dignity, and cannot fulfil 14:46 their potential, which has been given them as human beings as their birthright, 14:50 and for which they consciously or subconsciously long. 14:54 Just as the most pitiful and most numerous victims 14:58 of Communism were Russians, when totalitarian communism arose. 15:02 Just as the first victims of Nazi Germany 15:06 were Germans, in the same way, the victims of 15:10 inhumane totalitarian Islam, the ones most devastated are Arabs and other nations 15:14 that live under Islamic domination. Here and now, 15:18 I would like to express my deepest sympathy 15:22 with these people, especially to Muslim women, who suffer the most. 15:26 However, for Muslims, there is no other path than the path 15:30 to destruction, because they are denied that which forms the essence of human 15:34 nature, that is, development. 15:39 Islam, and its sharia legal system, is incompatible 15:43 with the principles of European law, especially with the rights 15:47 embedded in the Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 15:51 As (?) has said, how is it possible that our lawyers 15:55 do not know this? How is it possible that they are silent? 15:59 How is it possible that they accept all of the Muslims’ demands, 16:03 as they wave Article 9 around, of the above quoted Convention, 16:07 which guarantees freedom of thought, conscience and religious 16:11 faith? And how is it possible that if the Muslims 16:15 request protection according to this legal provision in our world, 16:19 that our own legal code cannot, at the same time — 16:23 there cannot be extended an equal protection to those opinions, thoughts and 16:27 religious convictions that oppose Islam? 16:31 And here, I will indulge in a brief aside. How well 16:36 Muslims are willing to listen to different views, that we have 16:40 seen for ourselves here. [i.e. the Turkish Ambassador and others walked out during her presentation] 16:48 Can our lawyers count up only to 14? 16:52 when Article 14 of the Convention says that the enjoyment of the rights 16:56 and freedoms described by the Convention must be guaranteed 17:00 without discrimination based on any criteria? 17:04 I am amazed that not even Mme. Professor, 17:08 not even Mme. Dr. Vysova, have been called upon 17:12 to comment on the following Article, 17:16 That would be Article 17 of the Convention on Human Rights and 17:20 Basic Freedoms, which states: “Nothing in this 17:24 may be interpreted so that it gives the state, 17:28 a group or individuals any right 17:32 to develop activities or commit actions directed towards destroying 17:36 any of the rights and freedoms acknowledged herein or restriction of these rights and freedoms 17:40 acknowledged herein or restriction of these rights and freedoms in a greater scope 17:44 than that determined by the Convention.” This provision 17:49 of the Convention was pushed through personally by Winston Churchill, 17:53 and he did so for a specific reason, as protection against 17:57 totalitarian regimes. He himself had, of course, 18:01 been thinking of the regimes of that time, communist regimes. 18:05 I am thinking of Islam, which is equally totalitarian 18:09 in my eyes, as equally threatening as those regimes, against which 18:13 Winston Churchill fought and over which he was victorious. 18:17 The protection by Article 17 correctly applies 18:21 against any ideology, and the fact that the European countries which lie within the jurisdiction 18:25 of the Convention have, so far, decided not to apply it, 18:29 this absolutely does not mean that they do not have the will to! 18:33 These countries are too kind, and are too aware of the price which 18:37 they have paid for their knowledge of the highest value of humanity 18:41 and they are also too patient. The assumption 18:45 of Muslim countries and leaders — who have decided to terrorise Europeans with their concept — 18:49 that the cause of this seeming indifference 18:53 of Europe is its weakness, is wholly erroneous. 18:57 Europe came to its opinion, to its world-view, has 19:01 worked towards this view at the cost of tens of millions of human lives sacrificed, 19:05 at the cost of suffering that no Muslim 19:09 can, perhaps, even imagine. Now, 19:14 Europe must still, over and over, ask Muslims: 19:18 “Do you want to live with us?” Because it’s not 19:22 whether we should fear Islam, and this is the acute, crucial 19:26 question, which must be answered, and which 19:30 can be answered only and alone by the Muslim nations. 19:34 So far it seems that the Muslims don’t want to 19:38 peacefully share the planet with the rest of the non-Muslim world. 19:42 Their terrorist acts, loudly declared 19:46 and committed in the name of Islam, demonstrate that they are not interested 19:50 in brotherhood among nations, and among peoples. 19:54 This reminds one, not just once, that 19:58 in the name of Christianity, no such [criminal] actions were committed, 20:02 and thus it is neither necessary or possible to 20:06 hold a conference: “Should we fear Christianity?” 20:10 It. perhaps, seems to be clear 20:14 no-one, perhaps, from past terrorists 20:18 nor from the brigades (?) 20:22 terrorists, each of whom (?) Europe (?) 20:26 [incomprehensible] 20:30 neither Christianity, nor (?) 20:34 Muslims shout out words about the superiority of Islam, 20:39 and its legal system, and words that mean we should submit to them. 20:43 We find no reason nor proof that 20:47 Muslims do not feel superior to us. 20:51 To us, women, homosexuals, 20:55 or whoever does not strictly adhere to the Koran. 20:59 In the near future, Europe will continue to pose this question 21:03 to Muslims, about peaceful coexistence. Then, it will come to 21:07 a metamorphosis of this question and it will sound quite different, 21:11 no longer “Do you want to live with us?”, but 21:15 it will say: “Do you want to live?” Do you, Muslims, 21:19 want to survive, because if you, devotees of Islam, want to survive, 21:27 Europe will do what it has already done twice, when it was threatened with 21:31 the danger of ideologies threatening the substance of humanity. 21:35 Even there, it will enter the battle and 21:40 crush its enemy. Part of this battle will again 21:44 be as in past wars, grand scientific 21:48 technical and technological advance, this time 21:52 unmistakably aimed at gaining a total advance in energy. 21:56 I have no idea, how it will happen in practice. Perhaps 22:00 we will succeed in finishing tokamak [a device using a magnetic field to confine plasma as a torus] 22:04 Perhaps we will succeed in drawing energy from a null field. 22:08 Perhaps we can draw some dark matter from space into our service. 22:12 However, in every case resulting from the violent acts caused by Muslims, 22:16 and the resultant war, will come the total 22:20 destruction of the Islamic ideology. 22:24 Islam will be believed in by just a few degenerate individuals, who have crawled into the desert, 22:28 from which there will vainly leak, into unending bogs, 22:32 unneeded and unasked-for oil. 22:36 Today, perhaps, the daughter of the artificial thought is that Europe is 22:40 where people should shake [in fear] for their future, their culture, 22:44 their philosophy and its identity (?). 22:49 The exact opposite is true. Just as through their malevolent acts, the Muslims 22:53 have taken the first steps towards their own absolute doom. 22:57 And it needs to be said that I, myself, 23:01 take no pleasure from this. 23:05 I would like to take the opportunity of this meeting to call on all Muslims, and all countries 23:09 who claim that their religion is Islam: Stop it. 23:13 You are heading down the wrong path. You are heading down a path that leads away from God. 23:17 You are on the path of murderers. 23:22 Your death will not bring you to Barbela, to 23:26 the land of the real God, but to 23:30 nothingness and nameless uselessness. 23:34 Nothing will be left of you, and the name of your so-called religion 23:38 will be pronounced with disgust. 23:42 It is often said of Islam 23:46 that it contains apocalyptic elements. 23:50 Thus, I would like to remind everyone of Revelation of St. John, 23:54 Chapter 12, which is called “The Vanquished Enemy.” 23:58 And there appeared a great sign in the Heavens: 24:02 a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and a crown of twelve 24:06 stars upon her head. This woman’s blue cloak flies 24:10 in each flag of the European Union. The crown of twelve stars 24:14 is on each European Union flag. 24:18 The Muslims ought to be asking: who is that snake or dragon 24:22 that this pregnant woman crushes beneath her feet and over whom she is victorious? 24:26 Muslims have brought Europe 24:30 once again into a state of war. 24:34 It is up to them to stop it. Should they not do so, 24:38 it will be done by (?). Thank you.

I dunno.

Should we fear a death cult whose founder and “perfect muslim” was a:

Child rapist
Slave master
Sex slave trafficker
Rapist
Liar
Mass Murderer
Hates dogs
Thief
Someone who thinks camel urine if god’s perfect medicine

“..Should We Fear Islam?...”

I think 9/11 answered that question. And now ISIS. But we should equally fear a pandering, permissive, anti-American element in our government that is flooding our country with UNKNOWN Islamics and turning our worst enemies loose from Gitmo and continues to maintain an OPEN BORDER policy.

And of course, the GOPe is totally useless.

“If a woman gets raped walking in public alone, then she, herself, is at fault. She is only seducing men by her presence. She should have stayed home like a Muslim woman.” - Dr. Abd Al-Aziz Fawzan Al-Fawzan, Professor of Islamic Law, Saudi Arabia.
Source: Front Page Magazine, The Woman Hunt in Germany.

“No More Blue Eyes And Light Hair!” Muslim Researcher Brags About Committing Genocide Of German People On German State-Funded Television
A major Islamic researcher, highly respected in her field, has said outright ‘we are going to destroy you completely from your culture down to your biological makeup’ on a taxpayer-funded television station–a German equivalent of PBS or C-SPAN. “No more blue eyes.” “No more light hair.”
http://freedomoutpost.com/no-more-blue-eyes-and-light-hair-muslim-researcher-brags-about-committing-genocide-of-german-people-on-german-state-funded-television/

I don’t fear Islam. I think they can easily be beaten. I don’t fear lots of things that could kill me or at least inconvenience me because I keep the doors of my house shut. However, if I kept my doors and windows open all the time there are all sorts of things I could fear, from burglars and murderers to stray dogs, snakes, skunks, etc. So while I do not fear Islam itself, I fear the Western leftist Quisling policies that will allow them to conquer the world.

“We should not fear Islam. Mohammedans should fear us.”

We should not fear Islam. We should ACT so that they, the Mohammedans,fear us.

Reciprocity would be a good start....trash their Quran upon arrival in our country?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.