Posted on 05/24/2016 10:11:25 AM PDT by GonzoII
What if you threw a gender party and no one came? A nice catch from the Daily Callers Chuck Ross allows us to add this to the Buried Lede Department. The Associated Press reported a couple of days ago on Team Hillarys delight over Donald Trumps personal attacks on Hillary and Bill Clinton, but only offered this nugget at the very end of the report. It turns out that claiming her physiology as a unique qualifier turned more voters off than on:
Trumps eagerness to make gender a major issue has complicated the delicate balancing act she already faces as the first woman to head a major party ticket.
Clinton has stopped explicitly mentioning her role in history and joking about being the youngest woman president. Thats by design: Those kinds of direct appeals werent working with voters.
De-emphasize the first talk, advised a research report done by Emilys List. They already know shed be the first woman president, the report said of donors, but we dont get anything by reminding them.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Poor Scooby!
If I was him, I’d drop a deuce in the back of the van >;-D
This is what the womynists wanted. Now the only people buying hillary act are the same old crusty libs from the 90s.
so what does she have left now? her great economic plan? her brilliant commitment to protect the country? her mastery of deal making with international trade partners? bringing back manufacturing? her wall to control illegals pouring into the country? NAME ONE, Hillery, just ONE.
Obama is more feminine than she is.
There is something very inhuman and mechanical about her. Even her speech is clunky and forced, like a nasty AI.
Hillary can blame Obama for this.
After nearly eight years of Barack Insane Obama flogging the race card till its in tatters, no one wants to see another Special Group card in use.
Poor Hillary should have flogged the gender card harder back in 08.
I saw a post on a lib site regarding Hillary:
“Two words: Margaret Thatcher”
Bwahahahahaha
I suspect he will because it's his nature. He fights.
I started a Cruz guy because he struck me as a rock ribbed conservative who fought. I was tired of squishy moderates who acted like an abused spouse who meekly takes the pummeling every election. Well, Cruz fought but Trump, well, with Trump it's like a cage match.
I feel at times like Lincoln must have with Ulysses S Grant. Grant was a drinker and unmannered and the genteel society didn't want him but Lincoln said "I can't spare this man, he fights!". And so he did, and the body counts rose and rose and I'm sure Lincoln cringed at the toll of each victory but, well, Grant was fighting (and winning!) and none of his predecessors showed much heart for that. Lincoln wanted victories and the only guy giving him them regularly was the drunk with muddy boots that fought like a swarm of wasps. So to hell with what the society dames and the elite generals want, Grant the fighter remains!
And so it is when Trump tweets out stuff that sometimes I cringe and shake my head at. I don't like everything he does but dammit, he fights! I'm with him!
Wonderfully written analogy. I think our nation senses our impending moral, economic,cultural and in deed out national demise if we do not “fight” NOW!!
Hillary is running the same type of campaign Dems have run for years. The same playbook. The same tactics. The same issues. Same-ole, same-ole.
She failed to pay close attention to the Republican primaries.
There, the Republican contenders, except one, were running the same type of campaign Pubbies have run for years. The same playbook. The same tactics. The same issues. Same-ole, same-ole.
Yeah what’s so great about being a woman when transgender is the new IT:-)
Wouldn’t you love to get into a Hillary focus group and play with their minds? The outcome would be HILLarious... Convince them that Hillary needs to only wear orange pantsuits....with DOC across the back to support doctors.
Took half of her arsenal away in one fell swoop.....Trump defused the “treat the female special because it’s sexist to not respect her, no matter how vile she is” ammo out of her pouch.....Carly showed us that it doesn’t work anymore.
Is she wearing blue contacts?
No, I don’t think so.
There are a number of pictures of her from last century where she appears to have blue or hazel eyes. So unless she has been wearing blue contacts for a very long time, it seems like that’s her real eyes.
You will be made to care...
It’s obvious the people who did the study haven’t seen pictures or television news clips of gay days in San Francisco or the Disney parks.
red
What else has she got?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.