Posted on 05/11/2016 10:42:10 AM PDT by rktman
On May 9 less than two years since universal background checks were hoisted onto the backs of law-abiding citizens in Washington state Gabby Giffords was in the state campaigning for special protective orders that will allow firearm confiscation.
The orders Extreme Risk Protection Orders would be similar to Californias Gun Violence Restraining Orders, inasmuch as they would allow family or household members to petition a judge to order the temporary confiscation of firearms from another family member or person living in the household.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I’m sure ol’ dain bramaged Gabby thought this up and executed it all by her own self.
Yup.
There is not one ounce of doubt I have that if it weren’t for our guns Obama would be just as ruthless as Stalin or Pol Pot.
She never got shot.
Will someone shut this ninny up?
Its sad to see how she is being used by the liberals. She had a horrible ordeal and is lucky to be alive. But it sickens me how liberals use that status to push gun control.
Game on!
Oh. Right. Gotcha.
She just suffered a spontaneous degradation of faculties.
Considering what happened to this woman, I think it’s inappropriate that she be taken seriously as a gun control advocate insofar as actual policy is concerned. She’s not going to have a detached, rational perspective on the issue.
my neighbor says he prays Garry comes personally to try to steal his firearms
Ah, progressives say we cannot gather up 20 million illegal aliens, but we can gather up 300 million guns from 100 million of us or so..
Bring it, Obamaholes, bring it.
May as well get this over with.
Oh, a few eggs may be broken.
Molon Labe. Time to defend the oath!
Too bad she was brain damaged in that incident. Unfortunately other gun grabbers don’t have that excuse.
She never got shot.
Oh. Right. Gotcha.
She just suffered a spontaneous degradation of faculties.
______
You don’t mean, she’s a, a liberal?
“She never got shot.”
She did.
If a dramatic increase in gun violence in Democrat controlled inner city and urban areas is her goal, then she is spot on. ONLY law abiding citizens will ever be disarmed by any such law or policy, it is the obvious and inherent reality regarding this kind of thinking.
The result will always be... criminal predators and terrorist, who have no desire or compulsion to obey any such new confiscatory gun laws, will largely be the only armed players, other than the Police State itself. Sheer idiocy.
I think someone should petition a judge to pick up all guns in Gabby’s household, after all: since she got plugged in the brain, she can’t have total use of all of her faculties.
Hoise that liberal twit up on her own petard.
What is your counter explanation, my FRiend?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.