Posted on 05/08/2016 1:07:18 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Most people think that the two most important names in the Democratic race for the White House in 2016 are Obama and Clinton. However, the two names you should be paying attention to are Cloward and Piven.
Don't know who they are? Don't worry, most people don't — but conservative commentator and generally kicka** guy Chuck Norris is going to make sure they do.
In an op-ed for WND, Norris explained that the two people — Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven — were academics who came up with a plan to introduce permanent socialism in the United States.
Norris said that "the Cloward-Piven strategy is a political plan created in 1966 by two Columbia University sociologists to overload the U.S. public welfare system, the goal being to replace it with a national system of 'a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.'
"I echo again that i'’s neither a coincidence that Obama graduated from Columbia University nor that others who espoused the Cloward-Piven strategy were a group of radicals who have been a part of his life and education: Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Bernardine Dohrn, George Wiley, Frank Marshall Davis, Wade Rathke and George Soros, among others," Norris continued.
"What's also not a coincidence is how close Hillary ran in the same circles."
Norris then goes on to make the frightening connections.
"Robert Chandler, a retired Air Force colonel and former strategist for the White House … explained in the Washington Times that 'much of (the Cloward-Piven) strategy was drawn from Saul Alinsky.' There's no doubt that Alinsky's life and work served as the coach and plan for Cloward and Piven," Norris writes.
"Hillary's similar discipleship devotion was clearly seen by her 92-page college thesis paper on Saul Alinsky, which is a glimpse behind the present veil of her politically savvy and guarded gloss into the heart of her true ideologies … No surprise that in 1993, the Clintons' asked officials at her alma mater to hide Hillary Rodham's senior thesis from Clinton biographers."
Norris also notes that the "Motor Voter" law, which was signed by Bill Clinton, was the brainchild of Cloward and Piven.
Barbara Ehrenreich, a collaborator of Cloward and Piven's, wrote that the movement for such a law "was dedicated to the idea that if citizens were allowed to register to vote when they apply for aid from government programs or for driver'’ licenses, some of the historic administrative encumbrances on the right to vote could be overcome.
"The poor in particular, who often lack the time for voter registration, would be effectively enfranchised."
And that's not all.
"What's not surprising is how the 'Motor Voter' law has morphed to incorporate more Cloward-Piven-Clinton strategies," Norris wrote.
"For example in Oregon, legislators have just enacted a subsidiary law that registers a person to vote when they obtain or renew a state driver's license. That might sound all fine and dandy, too, until one realizes that a stone's throw away in neighboring states like California, they are doling out licenses to 1.5 million illegals over the next three years. How long will it be until California's Motor Voter laws extend voting rights to illegals, too?”
"A first-year political student can easily see where a Hillary presidency will take Cloward-Piven strategies," Norris concluded.
"You see, the plan to 'fundamentally transform the United States of America' has a successor, and she must be stopped."
She had some work done on her face, you can tell.
If we had more candidates like Trump far fewer democrats would have continued being democrats for all these years. The Republicans have been stiffs who didn’t really care about growing their party, they only wanted money for themselves and the lobbyists.
Trump came out with guns blazing and he turned that around.
Look, hackers are going to hack their way in -- what difference does it make The question is, how much would they pay to save themselves the time? Taking the money always worked for Bill when he had secrets rich foreigners wanted, and we still left the White House flat broke. Who knows where it goes?
What does that mean?
you: I don't see any mention of Trump in the hedline or in the article. The headline is not written in cursive...So what's your problem?
Why such an ignorant, obnoxious response?
If the answer was contained in the article, I would not have asked that question. It is a simple, straightforward question, which I wanted to know the answer to. (I don't have a problem with anything in the article.) You obviously don't know the answer to that question either, so why did you respond?
By the way, if the only thing a person could post in response to an article was something that was actually contained in the article, there would be no need for any responses, just for the article itself. (That is not how Free Republic works. Responses can and usually do go beyond what is actually contained in the articles.)
Is there anyone else here who knows the answer to that question about Chuck Norris? (It sounds in this article like Chuck is backing Trump now against Hillary, but I was wondering if anyone has heard him come out yet and explicitly endorse Trump.)
Serious, sober replies only please.
EVERY morning a new slab of paint on. Must take some time to do, especially with her evil face !!!
There was some local video news footage here in Indiana when she was campaigning for the primary. It was much less “hazy” than the network stuff. A lot of makeup helps, but still looking pretty old compared to the network filtered view.
That book. Dedicated to Lucifer.
They’re posted all over the Free Republic Facebook page, and now they’re being posted here.
Cloward was born in NY. Same as the presumptive Republican nominee. Piven was born in Alberta Canada, which while being quite north, it is not “northeast”.
First found out about Cloward-Piven when I was investigating Obama in 08'. Lots of good info here:
The Academic road to communism: "First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the Cloward-Piven Strategy seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse." Sounds like stealth communism to me.
So, how are the Obamas and Clintons doing? Pretty good so far. They need to be Stopped and the country Restored!
Cloward Piven Stratety Links - DTN Lots of info here, and yes, that's Cloward and Piven behind Bill Clinton as he's signing the Motor-Voter Bill to get more dem voters. Both Clinton's are hard core communists who have covered it well.
Pray for America and prepare.
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
Fight On!
"Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when "the rest of society is afraid of them," Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would "the rest of society" accept their demands."
"You can see where I am going. The radical left and the national Democratic Party are increasingly one-and-the-same. Their relentless efforts to open the floodgates of illegal immigration and pack the voter rolls will illegal immigrant voters have the same objective: to overwhelm our government with an impossible flood of new problems and balkanize our society, while stacking the voter rolls with newly-minted democrats who will unwittingly support the radicals in their subversive efforts to destroy this country in favor of their socialist vision. It is Cloward-Piven on steroids."
"The Democrats made immigration a burning issue in very real hopes of destroying the Republican Party now. They almost succeeded, but instead it backfired. And while the immigration bill cloture vote may indeed have lost Republicans some support among Latino open-border proponents, what the Republican Party got back was its soul - a very worthwhile trade. Conservatives face high hurdles for 2008, but if this kind of principled behavior can be replicated again and again with the many more divisive issues Democrats plan to dump on us between now and then, Republicans will once again be able to draw a clear distinction between themselves as the party of principle and responsibility and the craven, fanatic, blatantly self-serving and willfully destructive Democrats."
"We cannot afford to quit. This may be our last chance."
More James Simpson article Here Good stuff. . Education is the Key. .
I wonder if Jesse Watters asked people on the street about the Cloward-Piven strategy, how many would know?
In February, Huckabee ended his 2016 campaign.
Norris said:
“We are not endorsing anyone at this time, but we will support whoever ends up being the nominee for the Republican Party in the general election.”
Mar 10, 2016 Ted Cruz Caught Lying On Chuck Norris Endorsement!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZouyypHW9Bw
Thanks for your informative and interesting reply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
