Posted on 05/01/2016 11:19:05 AM PDT by Tammy8
“Mexico First” has been the open, avowed policy of the government of Mexico for a generation, and Mexico expects its former residents to be loyal to Mexico for the next 200 years.
Yet, when Donald Trump calls for an “America First” foreign policy, as he did in a speech this past week, he is denounced by pundits and the national security establishment for “nativism” and “demagoguery,” as if that policy is a novel and radical idea.
Well, not in Mexico.
I know that for a fact because I had it explained to me in Mexico City back in 2001 by a Mexican cabinet official. His name was Juan Hernandez and you may have seen him on television in 2008 when he was candidate Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign liaison with Mexican-American voters. You see, Juan Hernandez is a dual citizen with dual loyalties, just like many of the 30-50 million Mexican Americans in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
And here I though Obama was anti-colonialist, well I guess only if the colonists are white Europeans from over 100 years ago...
Mexicans conquering America with the knowing assistance of our own government.
Muslims conquering Europe with the knowing assistance of the European governments.
What the heck is going on?
The PC gringos in this country can’t wait to celebrate Cinco de Mayo when a village in Mexico that they can’t find on a map won its “independence” from France for a day. LOL! Clowns.
If you understand the principle that God is in charge and that God will not be mocked, maybe it makes sense.
What’s going on is One World Government being forced down our throats.
God is causing these invasions?
Shirley he jests !
The purpose is to facilitate "evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements and activities of such persons." The law is administered by the FARA Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security Division (NSD) of the United States Department of Justice.[1] As of 2007 the Justice Department reported there were approximately 1,700 lobbyists representing more than 100 countries before Congress, the White House and the federal government.[2]
==============================================
History of the Act----- The Act originally was administered by the Department of State until transferred to the Department of Justice in 1942.[3] From passage in 1938 until 1966 when the Act was amended, enforcement focused on propagandists for foreign powers, even if it was not "for or on behalf of" those powers. It was used in 23 criminal cases during World War II. For cases not warranting prosecution, the Department of Justice sent letters advising prospective agents of the law.[3][4]
In 1966 the Act was amended and narrowed to emphasize agents actually working with foreign powers who sought economic or political advantage by influencing governmental decision-making. The amendments shifted the focus of the law from propaganda to political lobbying and narrowed the meaning of "foreign agent".[5] From that moment on, an organization (or person) could only be placed in the FARA database if the government proved that it (or he or she) was acting "at the order, request, or under the direction or control, of a foreign principal" and proved that it (or he or she) was engaged "in political activities for or in the interests of such foreign principal," including by "represent[ing] the interests of such foreign principal before any agency or official of the Government of the United States."[6]
This increased the government's burden of proof; since 1966 there have been no successful criminal prosecutions under the FARA act.[5] However, a civil injunctive remedy also was added to allow the Department of Justice to warn individuals and entities of possible violations of the Act, ensuring more voluntary compliance but also making it clear when the law has been violated. This has resulted in a number of successful civil cases and administrative resolutions since that time.[3]
(RIPE FOR CHANGE)
In 1995, the term "political propaganda" was removed from Subsection 611 following the 1987 Supreme Court case, Meese v. Keene, in which a California State Senator wanted to distribute three films from Canada about acid rain and nuclear war, but felt his reputation would be harmed if he distributed films that had been classified officially as "political propaganda".[4][7] The Court backed up an earlier lower court ruling in favor of one of the film's distributors in Block v. Meese.[8] The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA), 2 U.S.C. § 1601, removed from the Act certain agents engaged in lobbying activities who register under that Act, which is administered by Congress.[9]
In 2004 the Justice Department stated that the Foreign Agent Registration Unit's database for tracking foreign lobbyists was in disrepair.[10] However, in 2007 The Justice Department launched an online database which can be used by the public to search filings and current reports.[2]
================================
Scope of the Act------ The Act requires periodic disclosure of all activities and finances by people and organizations that are under foreign control ("agents") of a foreign government, of organizations or of persons outside of the United States ("foreign principal"), if they act "at the order, request, or under the direction or control" of this principal or of persons who are "controlled or subsidized in major part" by this principal.[6]
Organizations under such foreign control can include political agents, public relations counsel, publicity agents, information-service employees, political consultants, fundraisers or those who represent the foreign power before any agency or official of the United States government.[6]
SNIP---more at WIKI
The great news is we are sending them back. All of them. They can come legally . We will just use the laws we have!!! and a President you does his job!
Fight back has begun.
The federales are scared stiff their lavish luxury lifestyles fueled by our tax dollars are going to be curtailed......AS WELL THEY SHOULD.
=============================================
The billions in remittances sent back home by their citizens on US soil is dirty money.....and for sure Mexico is getting fees to allow 140 assorted countries to gather at the border to creep into the US and board our gravy train. Remittances pouring into Mexico from its citizens here illegally cashing multiple govt checks using several identities should be prosecuted for ID theft, wire fraud, govt fraud, and tax evasion. ///Mexicans are here illegally, riding the US gravy train under several identities....cashing multiple US govt checks, sucking up freebies at our schools, hospitals and welfare systems.
And calculatedly undermining US ntl security as agents of the Mexican govt.
ACCORDING TO THE GOVERNMENT OF MEXICO
IN A SWORN AFFIDAVIT TO A US COURT, MEXICO SWORE
THAT MEXICANS ON US SOIL ARE MEXICAN CITIZENS.
A sworn affidavit by Mexico/s Consul General to a Texas court asserts that Mexico/s official govt policy is to encourage its poor people to migrate here illegally in order to access our generous welfare system...... declaring that Mexico is responsible to protect its nationals wherever they may be residing.
A footnote states that Mexican nationality is granted to children born abroad of a Mexican born parent. IOW, anchor babies born in the US retain parents Mexican nationality.
The Mexican consul/s sworn testimony asserts that: "My responsibilities in this position include protecting the rights and promoting the interests of my fellow Mexican nationals, and, that the main responsibility of consulates is to provide services, assistance, and protection to Mexican nationals abroad."
=========================================
NOTE This also wipes out anchor babies......and DHS Secy, Jeh Johnson and Obama who say illegals have essentially "become American" b/c they go to school, have licenses to drive, and can even practice law in California.
The only way we are going to save America is to do what the Ninevites did when Jonah warned them of the impending destruction of their civilization.
If you don't know what that was, I suspect you must have skipped out of Sunday School as a kid.
It is an invasion and should be handled as such, military included.
Mexico and the Umma are competing for the colonization of North America just as the European powers did centuries ago. The methods are different but the intermittent cooperation among the colonizing Powers is similar. Eventually one will win out totally or the continent will be divided into different spheres. The Americans and the Canadians are making the same errors that the Indians made on initial contact so long ago. This time around the colonizers don’t have the advantage of different germs to aid them. That may be rectified in labs around the world, though.
Mexico is also sending us tons of heroin, criminal gangs, sexual deviants,serial killers, and a host of diseases resistant to antibiotics. BUILD THE WALL!
colonists and criminals
Bingo. When I’ve had discussions (i.e., arguments) with Mexicans about the U.S. stealing the Southwest from Mexico as a result of the Mexican American War, etc. and their desire to return it back to Mexico, I often state that they would have to reimburse the US for all the improvements done for the past 150 years, etc. Of course they get furious. Then I mention that if returning it to Mexico is such a good idea, why did 20% of Mexico’s population come here illegally looking for jobs, benefits, criminal enterprises, etc. Silence. Then I ask if returning it to Mexico is such a good idea, then you’ll see what was once a greatly improved, highly productive area of the U.S. turn into a complete mess as is Mexico. Silence. Last but not least, if we give it back, a wall 20 feet high will need to be built with full security along the entire length of the border since it too will fail, as has the rest of Mexico’s economy, and well, I don’t think we need anymore invaders with ridiculous demands for the balance of the U.S. Silence, indeed.
Makes perfect sense to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.